Am I wrong, or is this tank almost completely worthless? It doesn't seem to have a chance against a Panzer Iv, although if you run into someone extraordinarily incompetent (i.e. someone that can't find you in the 40 seconds it takes you to fire 3 shots to kill him) you can occasionally kill one.
What I see as the weak points
1. A extraordinarily crappy gun. Granted I'm no super tank ace.. but I had AP rounds richocheting off the sides of Panzer IVs inside of 800 yards.
2. Rate of fire is ~5-6 shots a minute... enough said.
3. Armor seems weak, typically one hit will knock out the turret from the front, at my typical engagement range of 800-1200 yards. Of course, after the one hit that disables the turret, I'll get hit 5,6,7,8 and up times with no damage. That has to be frustrating for them... it is frustrating for me and I'm on the recieving end.
The strong points..
1. It a little bit faster than the Panzer IV.
Of course, this just means you can get back to get killed again a little quicker, so it isn't really a strong point.
So am I completely off base? Popular opinion seems to agree with my assessment of the T-34 as being pretty worthless, it has less than 10% of the Panzer IVs kills... and it should still be new enough to have some kind of "novelty" factor.
I'd love to have a viable alternative to the Panzer, but it seems we don't have one yet. The M-8 is less than completely worthless, if that is possible, and the T-34 doesn't seem much better.