Originally posted by Golfer
Ok, please tell me exactly which 'ton' of parts of the 12,700lb Pratt PW2040 engine wound up a mile away from the crash site.
Please tell me your experience dealing with aviation accidents and inflight breakups.
Please tell me which institution you escaped from in order to believe any of the garbage conspiracy theorists are feeding you. When an airplane is moving at Vwaytoofast parts start coming off. Engines overspeed when too much air is rushed into them and can cause a whole engine section to go spewing out.
All I did was try to offer you a perfectly viable alternative to your wacko way of thinking but instead of saying "oh, that could be a possiblity" you duck and cover while sticking your head in the sand and scream "NOOOooOooOO, it can't be I am right!"
I'm really gonna shoot you to the moon with this one...
I don't think they need to explain anything to me. I have an inherent trust and faith in the government that the right knowledge is getting to the right people. 9/11 is gone and overwith. How the hijackers did what they did and all the in flight details which I am sure the government knows have no business being in my hands. I think its good to keep those ideas out of the hands of knuckleheads like you and simply let you toot your horns about a conspiracy theory. I think that with what the government knows about how the terrorists took the aircraft and how they acted in flight could save lives in the future should it happen again. Its better to keep it safely under wraps because what good would it be to release a "how to" manual for hijacking an airliner?
(Insert "You are a tool" photograph here)
Golfer, I am here on these BBs as a totally private person independent of any organizational affiliation and I don't voice any conspiracy theorists here. Until today I haven't even heard about any conspiracy theory concerning (I quote the Secretary of the Defense) the "shooting down" of the Flight 93 Airliner on 9-11. My very limited experience with the shooting down of the civilian airliners
(only one fake passenger spyplane and one stray cargo plane involved in Col. North's affair)
may be a big drawback in my "aviation accidents and inflight breakups" expertise. So I was ready to hear the word of experts on it.
But instead of that I see angry mob attacking my personal opinion in this matter. And more than that, some guys like you are trying to ascribe to me conspiracy theory about that fateful Flight 93. I am telling you with utmost sincerity that my personal conclusions drawn from the press and TV news just happen to coincide with the general aspects of one of your hated conspiracy theories. But the very fact that my personal and fully independent conclusions in this particular matter (I have never heard a word or read a single line about Flight 93 conspiracy theory before the guys like yourself started to accuse me in being the "tool" for it) speaks for itself. There's no smoke without the fire. Something IS wrong with the picture the general public is presented with.
And how dare you to shamelessly accuse me of being some kind of the "tool" when my daughter barely escaped becoming a victim of the events of 9-11 ? Or maybe you walked hundreds of Manhattan city blocks uptown and then downtown on 9-11 trying to get home from work like I did? Did you see the first smoke coming out of the WTC and hear the direct radiobroadcast when the Towers were collapsing?. Were you walking, exausted from the heat, down the streets of Manhattan on that day and were you thanking the Manhattanites, both the immigrants and the US-born citizens, who offered free to everybody the water from their stores and the lemonade from the make-shift stands? Were you smelling that horrible smoke from the WTC on 9-11 or were you inhaling it for the next several months, that smoke filled with the health-threatening particles and with the whiffs of burned human bodies ? Or maybe you were desperately trying to reach your loved ones over the cell phone that went dead?
How you dare ?! May be you tell all those people who now suffer from the inhalation of that smoke why the head of the Environment Protection Agency lied to them about the "harmlessness" of that smoke?
Shut up Golfer, stick your tongue into your ace-hole, and just listen to what other people say.
And I don't want to discuss with you the direct link of the airplane engine swept by the g-force
to the "how to" manual for the terrorists. There's obviously absolutely no link between these two things.
