The facts are:
Evolutionism is theory.
Creationism is a "religous" theory.
No one is arguing this.
So, the inclusion of a sticker to say that the "evolution" is not a fact and is indeed a "theory" does not seem to be a problem to me...
I think the printing that "evolution" is indeed fact is misleading, and it should be taught as it applies as a well supported theory based on evidence thus far gained.
Now, had the sticker said that evolution was a theory, and that people should look to creationism as the fact, then, the courts would be correct in having it removed. It does not mention creationism in the least.
I fail to see where the issue is, other than that some one believes the sticker implies that creationism is the alternative. The only way I can see them thinking this way is that the stickers were placed there by a church group...
Hmmm, so let's see if I got this straight? Stating fact, that indeed evolutionism is a theory is incorrect, but stating incorrectly that evolutionism is indeed fact is ok... wow, I guess I need to go to law school, maybe I can learn how they do that... maybe I could get my mortgage company to believe that $1200 is really in "fact" $2400...

<--- for you RPM
