Originally posted by Ack-Ack
If his post had been constructive critism then I would agree but it wasn't. It was a very lame flame against HT and HTC for basically saying that he and his company are not up to the abilities to design and build a quality game and should look for outside assisatance to shore up any short comings. His posting of a 5+ year old game screen shot just proves he was trying nothing more than trolling with a lame bellybutton flame.
ack-ack
as far as content, i would agree. the image had proven to be misleading. but i really dont think that he, or any of the others are too far off par with the actual state of affairs regarding graphics.
what could be a great game is serving only half of the court when it could step up a serve all.
this is just an opinion.
i have not hit anyones mother or lit a church on fire by saying so, but i suspect that will not matter... there will be some loyal opposition. but it is true to some of us.
thing is,people probably dont bother to criticize something that they dont care about. or at least, that is how i have felt.
i agree that this game is lacking in that department. i agree also that this version of aces high is less graphically enabled than the first. it is a bit of a let down if you ask me.
but then. you didnt.
so, i digress.
salute.
88
