Originally posted by midnight Target
I'm not arguing about why, just the consequences. We shouldn't have gone, the results make that obvious... so what now?
Hind Sight is always 20/20.
Everyone in power all over the world agreed that he had WMD's. I distinctly remember hearing it over and over and over. NOT just OUR president but EVERYWHERE. Senators , Reps. Foriegn Leaders form all over said it was VERY likely and some said it as fact that he had them. So now that they found no WMD's everyone runs like mice from a ship saying..."Well I...I..Huh..I..." Passing the Buck to G-Dub.
Now we just have to try our best to make the best and most stable place we can.
If you listen to the Doom sayers...as well as the other side..and try to come to your OWN conclusions...Would it bring you to think that what has happened in Iraq would have happened?
Could you see 1000's of insurgents coming in to help?
Say there were WMD's found...and STILL insurgents were coming in by truck loads. Foreseeable?
Beheadings in the streets...Kidnappings..large scale assaults?
Terrorists coming in by droves from other countries?
Bad info may have lead this Country to a war. A war based on what we were told about WMD's and being the truth. I really don't think Bush lied to the U.S. outright as much as the CIA and operatives in country were lied to or told blatent lies back to our leaders. He based is stuff on what he got told. Wrong yes...But here we are.
As I said hind Sight is ALWAYS 20/20. Now that the "experts" have all the fuel they need...why don't they FIX it instead of throw CRAP back and forth and blame everyone but themsleves for the poor judgment and foresight?