Author Topic: Evidence for life on Mars (Read 3660 times)

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #30 on:** March 02, 2005, 12:03:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Silly.
Certainly there is life on Mars.
And its been here. In Grovers Mill NJ,Not a 20 minute ride from me. I've seen the plaque and can verify its existance thus proving Martians have really been here

Other damn pic didnt work

Her's another.
again PROOF Martians have been here LOL

Martian landing site

NUKE · « **Reply #31 on:** March 02, 2005, 12:08:37 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
You see... first, it's "the professor sounds like an idiot" and then, "and some people wonder..."

Nuke... can you be any more vague?

I stand by my statements.

The professor is an idiot, because he assumes that aliens are manipulating human DNA......... he assumes such a stupid thing.....he's an idiot. No Alien life form has ever been discovered, yet this guy takes a leap of ignorance and assumes that alien life not only exists, but is fuggin with DNA.

LOL!

Siaf__csf · « **Reply #32 on:** March 02, 2005, 12:47:52 AM »

Several religious groups have denied the existense of extra terrestial life for centuries. So yes, if some was found they would be proven wrong along with the rest of thier teachings.

The Spanish inquisition slaughtered several people for just daring to blame the earth wasn't the center of the universe let alone this isn't the only place where life exists. It's a center issue on many religions that God created man on _earth_ along with animals and man is over the animals. I even remember seeing a religious argument where scientists claimed there could be life outside earth and religious people denied even the possibility.

Thrawn · « **Reply #33 on:** March 02, 2005, 01:07:52 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
I stand by my statements.

The professor is an idiot, because he assumes that aliens are manipulating human DNA......... he assumes such a stupid thing.....he's an idiot.

You fool, the professor is QUESTIONING IT.

Cripes save yourself some time and don't even attempt to go head to head with someone with a doctorate in biology on biology itself, even through proxy.

Lazerus · « **Reply #34 on:** March 02, 2005, 02:26:44 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by NUKE
No Alien life form has ever been discovered, yet this guy takes a leap of ignorance and assumes that alien life not only exists, but is fuggin with DNA.

LOL!

Quote

Originally posted by ThrawnYou fool, the professor is QUESTIONING IT.

He is not questioning it. He is assuming facts and injecting conjecture.

Quote

Originally posted by SunTrackerAccording to an ecology professor of mine, the question isnt really "Is there alien life in space". Its "Is the alien life using DNA as a method of replication".

SunTracker · « **Reply #35 on:** March 02, 2005, 03:03:02 AM »

Quote

The professor is an idiot, because he assumes that aliens are manipulating human DNA......... he assumes such a stupid thing.....he's an idiot. No Alien life form has ever been discovered, yet this guy takes a leap of ignorance and assumes that alien life not only exists, but is fuggin with DNA.

WTF

Lets take this very slowly. Many people in the scientific community believe, due to the sheer volume of planets in the Universe (we have discovered 130 so far), that there will be life on some of them. The big question is not 'if' there are alien life forms (most biologist assume there are). The question is what do they use to replicate themselves. All life on this planet, with the exception of some bacteria, transmit their genetic material by DNA (deoxyribosenucleic acid). It would really be fascinating to find a life form that didnt use this system.

Thrawn · « **Reply #36 on:** March 02, 2005, 04:03:09 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lazerus
He is not questioning it. He is assuming facts and injecting conjecture.

First, I should have been more clear I was referring to this.

"No Alien life form has ever been discovered, yet this guy takes a leap of ignorance and assumes that alien life not only exists, but is fuggin with DNA."

Second, there is nothing wrong with assuming that the standing theory is accurate unless you find data which disproves all or part of it.

Unless one thinks that scientists are supposed ignore the evidence and try to re-prove theorys that have already been tested for. If such were the case, they would never be any progress.

I find it hilarious that Nuke, calls the professor an idiot when it comes to biology when he himself doesn't appear to even know basic highschool science.

bunch · « **Reply #37 on:** March 02, 2005, 04:13:00 AM »

Well, it is definitely proof of available research grants on earth

Jackal1 · « **Reply #38 on:** March 02, 2005, 05:31:28 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Several religious groups have denied the existense of extra terrestial life for centuries. So yes, if some was found they would be proven wrong along with the rest of thier teachings.

Which group or groups for example?

Sikboy · « **Reply #39 on:** March 02, 2005, 07:09:40 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by bunch
Well, it is definitely proof of available research grants on earth

ROFL, viva academia!

-Sik

Siaf__csf · « **Reply #40 on:** March 02, 2005, 07:37:09 AM »

Jackal1: All groups basically that base thier faith on Bible. The Bible contains no references to extraterrestial life - on the contrary it's describing how life was created on earth from nothing.

Jackal1 · « **Reply #41 on:** March 02, 2005, 07:43:42 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Jackal1: All groups basically that base thier faith on Bible. The Bible contains no references to extraterrestial life - on the contrary it's describing how life was created on earth from nothing.

I have never heard or seen statements or arguments against alien life from any religious group I know of. That`s why I was asking. Don`t mean the argument doesn`t exist. I`ve just never heard of it.
What would no reference to extraterrestial life in the bible have to do with it?
The Bible, as I see it, relates to creation of earth, human life, creator and the here after.

storch · « **Reply #42 on:** March 02, 2005, 08:44:49 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
Nevertheless... when you find your creator (or not), it'll no longer be a matter of faith.

yes, but the proving ground is the here and now. that's why it's call faith.

if it were clearly evident then it would not be a matter of faith. there are some of us who inspite of much ridicule and derision from our peers actually "see" the evidence (as it were) and frankly don't understand other's failure of grasping the obvious.

science has no clear evidence supporting any of it's positions when it comes to the questions of origin and evolution either yet millions repeat it's dogma in rote.

all I can say is if I'm wrong and folks like you are right then upon expiration I will experience nothing.

on the other hand..............get your asbestos underware drycleaned frequently, buy more that a cuople also.

Siaf__csf · « **Reply #43 on:** March 02, 2005, 08:59:27 AM »

Jackal I'm not sure of the current stand of the catholic church for example, but at one time they also denied any chance of an extraterrestial lifeform.

The idea is based on the total trust to the Bible. If you're a strict creationist there's no space for any life outside earth according to the bible.

storch · « **Reply #44 on:** March 02, 2005, 09:06:41 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Jackal1: All groups basically that base thier faith on Bible. The Bible contains no references to extraterrestial life - on the contrary it's describing how life was created on earth from nothing.

actually there a several references in the Bible which at least to me clearly indicate extraterrestrial visitation/intervention.

1. Gen. 5:24
2. Gen. 19:27 archeologists have actually discovered this site and verified the destruction.
3. 2 Kings 2: 10-12

Author Topic: Evidence for life on Mars (Read 3660 times)

storch

storch