Yes, i am pretty busy with RL issues currently, but i just want to jump in an give a couple of answers from memory i can write down in 5 mins.
Henning is indeed correct that JUMO213 uses charge mass and not boost for power control. Boost pressure varies because of this with temperature and so on.
But the rough figures for a JUMO213A with 1 : 6,5 compression ration and rated at 1750PS are the following:
Climb & Combat 1620 PS ~ 1,4 ata
Take-off/Emergency 1750 PS ~ 1,5 ata
Increased Emergency 1900 PS ~ 1,7 ata
MW50 injection 2100PS ~ 1,78 ata
I have not picked out all data for the next developement steps of the JUMO from the documents yet, but Junkers went multiple ways to increase power. One was with high quality fuel (C3) by using a higher compression ration of 1 : 8,5, others were just higher boost pressure, than there were also RPM increases or a even combination of ways. Its a complex issue, because some engines don't even got a regular designation.
And to give a quick glance on the MW50 test, Wk.-Nr. 210 002 reached speeds of 570-580 km/h with Erhoehte Notleitung and 590-595km/h at SL using MW50, without ETC504 attached and a puttied and polished surface.
In a later test were a gap between engine and wing was covered, 002 managed 608km/h at SL using MW50.
But all tests were done using underperforming engines, mentioned in both FW and Junkers documents and so they approve Hennings oppion that the engine of 002 was somewhat "bad". He was right, because the first serial production chargers did not reach intended full boost altitude and airflow, according to Junkers reports of benchtests with there JUMO213 engines from the first serial production batch.
And funny to note, comparative test with Wk.-Nr. 210 001 with standard factory surface finish reached the same speeds as 002. FW was a bit curious why the higher quality surface finish of 002 did not show in better performance and were keen to investigate that issue further.
The conclusion of FW was that with engines performing to the published figures and good factory finish a serial production D9 will reach the calculated performance figures.
About D11/D12/D13, those planes were really only around in penny pocket numbers. Maybe ~50 if you take all three together. Problems here were mainly that the JUMO213E/F never got produced in numbers. You can skip them for any comparison of wartime operations. But it should be mentioned that below ~6000m the D9 performs as good or even a tad better than those three, above that alt the two stage three gear of the JUMO213E/F will give them a huge performance advantage over the D9.
