The Clinton administration did not think Militia's were a joke or a non-threat to the government. While I am not sure of the practicality of a militia, I support states rights and the formation of state militia's. Not so sure about the 'bubba hunting club' militia, but that's one for the lawyers to decide on.
When 'the people' have the right to peaceably assemble and speak freely, a militia is not needed. The pen is mightier than the sword. The only reason for the concept of a militia to exist is when those rights to assemble and speak are threatened by internal or external enemies.
I view the militia as part of the 'checks and balances' in the US democratic system. Similar in concept to the judiciary, executive, and congressional branches of the government. Lately the judicary branch as been under severe scrutiny because of disagreements with a majority party in the executive and congressional branches. Balance will be restored once people realize that the 'terrorist threat' has be mitigated by focused intelligence (note that the Clinton administration dropped the ball on this intelligence, partly due to focus on 'threatening' militias).
Regards,
Malta