Originally posted by Krusty
The following need to be taken from the category they are in and shifted to the next category down.
C.202
C.205
LA5
Trust me. In 1941 setup the 202 dominates. It's more of a mid war plane. The 205 is not as uber as some, but has better power and weapons and is more like a low-end late-war performer.
La5 is just a no-brainer. It's a half step behind the LA7
202:
The 202 clearly has the flight performance edge on my early war list. It belongs with the early birds (IMO) because its guns suck. It takes so much ammo, up-close-and-personal, to down a plane that it’s pathetic. I just happened to be flying this bird in the MA a couple of days ago and it took tons of hits to do any damage. I’m doing better in the MA in the P-40b (POS) just because it’s 2x50’s are lethal enough. I’d trade the 202’s 4 guns for a single 50 with 300 rounds. In a furball, the 202 either gets an assist, or takes so long to down an enemy that by the time you’ve sawed halfway through a guy’s wing, all of his buddies are on you.
205:
Great bird; rivals the spit IX in flight performance, if not a bit better. Once again the Italian guns are a factor; while certainly lethal they are not as effective as the Spit’s Hispanos and 50’s.
LA-5
I wouldn’t argue against it being a late war class machine. It would get eaten alive in the late sector though.
Originally posted by Krusty
Also, why can't you duplicate planes? All of early are in mid. All of early and mid are in late. So that late has them all (for those that want to fly the a6m2 vs the chog, for example)
I agree, and stated above:
“Put three of those little areas on one map, apart from each other.
At one, make available early war only.
At another, make make available early and mid war only,
At the last, make all available.”
eskimo