Originally posted by FUNKED1
I can't say that based on what I've read. The Constitution has no bearing on the internal affairs of a church congregation.
And Frist has a right to his religious views and free speech.
Frist, the leader of the United States Senate, which is but one of the three branches of government, aligns himself in an attack on another branch of government, based on religion.
He attacks his own branch of government's procedures, based on religion.
I don't know how you can divorce yourself from the reality of that, and claim that it has nothing to do with the seperation of powers, and then claim that it's no threat.
You just said that you were unaware of any of this, then upon finding it, would not piss on Frist were he on fire. On what basis if not this?