Author Topic: Realistic Plane lists  (Read 1913 times)

Offline Rafe35

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1426
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #15 on: May 18, 2005, 08:13:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Arlo
New? :)

I want ......
F4U-1A
Rafe35
Former member of VF-17 "Jolly Rogers"

Offline killnu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3056
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #16 on: May 18, 2005, 08:49:25 PM »
P38F and P38H
Karma, it follows you every where you go...

++The Blue Knights++

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #17 on: May 18, 2005, 10:04:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by killnu
P38F and P38H


Come on KillnU!  You forgot the P38E so we could fight in the Aleutians and get the first 38 kills of the war :)

54th FS time!

Dan/CorkyJr
« Last Edit: May 18, 2005, 10:20:36 PM by Guppy35 »
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #18 on: May 18, 2005, 10:35:50 PM »
Fantasy pick:


Historical pick:
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #19 on: May 19, 2005, 06:24:07 AM »
Brewster model 239...
And for the second, P39. Here's a Q15:
Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #20 on: May 19, 2005, 09:39:24 AM »
Mig 3

B-25


for 2 vehicles

Sherman Firefly

Cromwell
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #21 on: May 19, 2005, 09:43:50 AM »
US Planes only!  would pop off> :rofl
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Pooface

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2520
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #22 on: May 20, 2005, 08:17:11 AM »
ooh yeah, p39 should be added too

i like the ideas about the tanks bodhi

b25, later version would do pretty well too

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #23 on: May 20, 2005, 09:03:06 AM »
I feel that the D4Y would be one of the best additions for Special events, because as it stands the Japanese are gross disadvantage in any Carrier duel after 1942. While the US has the advantage of subbing the far superior Avenger for the woeful devistator in early battles, the Japanese are stuck with the fun but underperforming Val and Kate when it comes to carrier strike planes.

Now, the Japanese will always be at a disadvantage when it comes to bombload, however the D4Y would give them a significantly increased porbability of reaching the target. With a speed of aroudn 350 mph, intercepting Judys will be very difficult for the US. I've succesffully taken Vals and Kates into attacks through heavy CAP (against F4Fs),  so I think the Judy could meet success against F6F and F4U cap. If I were an F4U or F6F player who liked events, I'd want the D4Y, because chasing those bastards would actually be a challange, as opposed to the cripple fight that ensues when you bounce a bunch of D3As

Also, I think it is easily the best looking Carrier Strike plane.

« Last Edit: May 20, 2005, 09:06:04 AM by Sikboy »
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline gear

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #24 on: May 20, 2005, 10:55:46 AM »
Junkers Ju 88C-6c
Role: Night-fighter  
Crew: Three  
Dimensions: Length 47 ft 1.25 in (14.36 m); Height 16 ft 7.5 in (5.06 m); Wing Span 65 ft 7.5 in (20.0 m); Wing Area 586.63sq ft (54.5 sq m)
Engine(s): Two liquid cooled, 12 cylinder inverted-Vee, Junkers Jumo 211J-1 (or J-2) of 1,340 hp (? kW) each.
Weights: Empty Equipped 19,973 lb (9,060 kg); Normal Take-off 27,227 lb (12,350 kg); Maximum Take-off ? lb (? kg)
Performance: Maximum level speed 303 mph (488 kph) at 19,685 ft (6,000 m); Cruising speed 263 mph (423 kph) at same altitude; Time to 19,685 ft (6,000 m) 12 min 42 sec; Service ceiling 32,480 ft (9,900 m); Normal range on internal fuel 1,230 mls (1,980 km).
Armament: Three fixed forward-firing 20mm MG FF/M cannon and three fixed forward-firing 7.9mm MG 17 machine guns in lower nose section, one flexible 13 mm MG 131 machine-gun at rear of cockpit. Optional 'Schräge Musik' installation in upper fuselage with two 20 mm MG 151 cannon firing obliquely forward

Offline gear

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #25 on: May 20, 2005, 11:03:06 AM »
Official designation:  Junkers Ju 87g
Common designation:  Stuka (a contraction of the word Sturzkampfflugzeug)  
Type:  two-seat dive bomber    
Engines: One Junkers Jumo 211P inline piston engine  
Horsepower: 1,500  
Crew: 2  
Weight Empty (lbs): 8,686 (3940 kg)  Max Take-off Weight (lbs): 14,550 (6600 kg)  
Length: 37ft 8.8in (11.50m)  Height: 12ft 9.5in (3.90m)  
Wingspan: 49ft 2.5in (15.00m)  Wing Area: 362.7 sq ft (33.60m squared)  
Speed (mph): 248 (400 km/h) at 15,750 ft (4800m)  Range (miles): 410 (660km)  
Service Ceiling: 27,885 ft (8500 m)  

Armament: Two forward firing 20mm MG 151/20 cannon, One Rear-mounted cockpit 7.92mm MG81 machine-gun  
Ammunition: 6,000 Pzgr and 2,700 Patr SmK  
Bombload: One 3,968 lb. (1800-kg) bomb under fuselage and a 1,102 lb (500-kg) bomb under each wing  

From 1942 on the Ju 87G-1 was a dedicated anti-tank aircraft on the eastern front. It was fitted with a 1400hp Junkers Jumo 211J engine. It had a maximum speed of 314km/h, a ceiling of 8000m and a very limited range of only 320km. The reduced speed and range was due to the armour plating installed to protect the pilot and gunner when flying low-level tank busting missions. It was armed with two 30mm cannons in pods under the wings and a 7.92mm machine gun in the back for the gunner.








Offline TexMurphy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1488
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #26 on: May 20, 2005, 11:23:05 AM »
1). PE-2 and PE-8. http://www.vectorsite.net/avpe2.html WE NEED RUSSIAN BOMBERS!!!!
2). Ki-43-IIIa was tossing it up between LaGG 3, MiG-3, P-39, Ki-44 and the Oscar. All these should be top prio additions as they where all very significant fighters and are of nations severly lacking in their arsenal.

Tex

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #27 on: May 23, 2005, 06:42:44 PM »
Well, 2 is hard, 4 would have been ok.
Ok, I'll cheat ;)
P39/P63. They look almost the same, while the 63 is definately a MAplane, the 39 is necessary for history and a perk harvester maybe?
Then it gets tough. Spit VIII? Beau? B25?
Well, sory, my vote goes to the He 111, in case the V-1 option could be added, - hehe another cheat .....
FYI, some 1200 of those were launched low over the North sea. So, the first ever cruise missile.

It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #28 on: May 23, 2005, 06:47:34 PM »
More of the air launced V-1:





And more funny ops.....a glide-torpedoe.....





Hope that the images work :)
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline onions4u

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 80
Realistic Plane lists
« Reply #29 on: May 23, 2005, 09:57:43 PM »
A26 attack bomber- like a A20 with 20 mm's and could carry 4 k of bombs plus rockets. It was also a little faster than the A20

p39/P63 with these we could have a russian fighter that carried
a bomb other that a 100 lbs. Could be used as US or russian.

 20mm ostie (wirblewind?) for gvs need it more than tanks now

At least more russian or japanese planes we need those more than american/german/uk planes

Or how about a couple of italian aircraft