Poo:
"matey, u obviously havent read much have you. the 47 n is very quick, and has stats of a good perk ride, but we are trying to make sure that it ISNT perked. i personally dont want it to be, and dont think that it needs it. read the thread again. i started this post kind of for everyone to tell htc NOT to perk it. of course other people do want it perked, so its a discussion on what is suitable, not a damn whine, so until you understand whats going on, dont go making assumptions. this isnt like a 'i want the lala perked' its a i DONT want the 47 perked. it may have great stats, but its a hard plane to fly, and i dont think that many will fly it. they will as you say, go back to the 51's, nikis and spits, so i feel that perking it would be silly"
Whoa! hold up bub. First off I
DO fully understand, I was not "whining" about anything or wanted this to become a "whine"
You state: "I personally don't want it perked" and others feel otherwise. This is fine, I stated I DON"T CARE and don't see what differance it makes. So until I fully understand? understand what? As if I can't grasp the concept of another "perk" plane or no "perk" plane. Furthermore, I'm not making assumptions on anything. I stated I feel it won't make any differance IMO.
You are always going to have the "Don't perk this ride" crowd and the "please HT for the love of God perk this plane" crowd.
"
I started this post kind of for everyone to tell htc NOT to perk it. I added to the post stating I feel it won't make a diff.
"of course other people do want it perked" Imagine that!
"and i dont think that many will fly it. they will as you say, go back to the 51's, nikis and spits, so i feel that perking it would be silly" AND I'm making assumptions?
