Author Topic: Afghani Perspective  (Read 1772 times)

Offline blur

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 154
Afghani Perspective
« on: September 15, 2001, 09:32:00 AM »
(The following was written by an Afghani writer who lives in the Bay Area. I think the following offers some interesting insights into this area of the world.}

I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone
Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed that this would mean
killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this atrocity,
but "We're at war, we have to accept collateral damage. What else can we
do?" Minutes later I heard some TV pundit discussing whether we "have the
belly to do what must be done."

And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I am
from Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never
lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who will
listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.

I speak as one who deeply hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. My hatred
comes from first hand experience. There is no doubt in my mind that these
people were responsible for the atrocity in New York. I agree that something
must be done about those monsters.

But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the
government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics
who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political criminal with a
plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden, think
Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in
the concentration camps."

It's not only that the Afghan people had nothing to do with this atrocity.
They were the first victims of the perpetrators. They would exult if someone
would come in there, take out the Taliban and clear out the rats nest of
international thugs holed up in their country.

Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The
answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering. A
few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000 disabled
orphans in Afghanistan-a country with no economy, no food. There are
millions of widows. And the Taliban has been burying these widows alive in
mass graves. The soil is littered with land mines, the farms were all
destroyed by the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons why the Afghan
people have not overthrown the Taliban.

We come now to the question of "bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age".
Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already.
Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses?
Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done. Eradicate their
hospitals? Done. Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine
and health care? Too late. Someone already did all that.

New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would they at least
get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat,
only they have the means to move around. They'd slip away and hide. Maybe
the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, they don't move too
fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But flying over Kabul and dropping
bombs would not really be a strike against the criminals who did this
horrific thing. Actually it would only be making common cause with the
Taliban-by raping once again the people they've been raping all this time.

So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with true
fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there with
ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do what needs to be
done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to kill as many as
needed. Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms about killing
innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's actually on
the table is Americans dying. And not just because some Americans would die
fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's much
bigger than that folks. Because to get any troops to Afghanistan, we'd have
to go through Pakistan. Would they let us? Not likely. The conquest of
Pakistan would have to be first. Will other Muslim nations just stand by?
You see where I'm going. We're flirting with a world war between Islam and
the West.

And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he wants.
That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's all right
there. He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might seem
ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam and the
West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the west wreaks a holocaust in those
lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's even better
from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong, in the end the West
would win, whatever that would mean, but the war would last for years and
millions would die, not just theirs but ours. Who has the belly for that?
Unfortunately, Bin Laden does. Anyone else?

In Peace,

Tamim Ansary

Offline AKDejaVu

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5049
      • http://www.dbstaines.com
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2001, 09:42:00 AM »
I totally agree with the use of ground forces.  The "smart" techology is both indescriminant and impersonal.  Smart weapons will be used to take out many defense systems, and I am sorry if there will be Afghani regulars manning them that have no political ties to the Taliban.

The one part I disagree with the is the need to take Pakistan to accomplish this goal.  Russia has already pledged military support in whatever reprisals we seek.  They have the greatest airlift/troop delivery capacity in the world (Thankyou "Wings of the Red Star").  That could easily be utilized.

Basically... its going to boil down to one simple thing:  We are going to get Bin Ladin and we are going to get the Taliban.  Please stay out of the way or you are likely to get hurt.  I hope the Afghani people see with clarity what decision needs to be made there.

AKDejaVu

Offline Naso

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1535
      • http://www.4stormo.it
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2001, 09:47:00 AM »
Very interesting Blur, thank you.

Offline lazs1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 996
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2001, 10:03:00 AM »
I also agree with ground troops and... I feel that any country that harbors terrorists and in public, refuses to hand em over, deserves whatever collateral damage happens to em.

We have been told that the official government will not turn over known (and wanted)terrorists.  I consider such a hostile government to be a threat to our ground troops... I would, at the very least like to have all afghan military capability destroyed  before sending in ground troops.   I do not advocate killing civilians for vengence sake but if some are killed while taking out military targets.... such is the way of living in a country that is at war with the civilized world.  

IMO... the government of afganistan should be classified as hostile untill proven otherwise.  any ground troops we send in should be secure from any afghan government military action.  Any furture harboring of terrorists whould be met in the same manner.   No matter what country is involved.   You are either with us or at war with us in this war on terrorism.

The afghans can cooperate and help taking out these nests and help in assuring that they are unwelcome in the future or they can risk collateral damage.   Not a lot of options here.
lazs

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18771
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2001, 10:10:00 AM »
good post

But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the
government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics
who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political criminal with a
plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think Bin Laden, think
Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in
the concentration camps."


I am sure the ppl who have their fingers on the buttons, the war eagles, are well aware of the facts presented in this article as well as others. I trust the leaders of this country and its military to do the right thing. The question is, is what's right for America, right for the "global" community? How long will this alliance last? Time will tell..
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Tuomio

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 523
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2001, 10:31:00 AM »
Actually only thing guerilla soldier need is ak47. They dont need mcdonalds or catering services that american ground troops need. Missiles and bombs are ineffective against scattered guerilla troops especially in the Afghani rocky mountains, where theres lots of natural bomb shelters to duck in.

Thats why you have to have Afghanistan regular people support behind you, otherwise you would suffer heavy casualties. I hope Nato succeeds in that. Terrorists have already shown, that they can attack US at will, almost anywhere they want. Only way to evade it would be complete closing of borders, which would be very bad for your economy.

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2001, 10:34:00 AM »
Very good post.

Unfortunately, I am going to have to be a bit pessimistic about what we will do.  I do not think our country has the stomach for a ground war.
Too many people are too concerned with more loss of American life.  I too am concerned, but I would gladly shoulder arms in a ground battle.  I would proudly fight and die for this cause.
I have a lot to lose in a ground war.  My son is military and they are expediting his training as we speak.  

But if a ground war will make a safer place for the future generations, then bring it on.  Someone has to draw the line.  The longer we wait the worse it will get.

I am very glad we have people from those torn countries to let us know how they feel and what we could or should do.  It is good insight.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline Steven

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 681
      • http://members.cox.net/barking.pig/puke.htm
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2001, 11:30:00 AM »
I agree it won't be easy or quick and will require the creation of some new thinking and tactics.  Since the goal by our enemy is our extinction, there is nothing to bargain over.  Our house is infested and we may never get them all, but we can cut down their numbers and contain them.

I have no bone to pick with innocents.  I want to grind the bones of the guilty and their associates into dust.  

Tuomio, American military personnel need McDonalds and catering services?!?  You need to be slapped.

-Puke
332nd Flying Mongrels

Offline capt. apathy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4240
      • http://www.moviewavs.com/cgi-bin/moviewavs.cgi?Bandits=danger.wav
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2001, 11:35:00 AM »
Quote
They dont need mcdonalds or catering services that american ground troops need.

Tuomio, you are an ass.
 just because we choose to provide comforts to our military when possable, don't think they are soft or unprepared.

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2001, 11:51:00 AM »
Good post Blur.  I went to college with an Afghani fellow and it's the same story...

Bin Laden has said before that he does indeed desire a war between all Muslim countries and the West.  He might have started this war already though.   :(

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2001, 06:24:00 PM »
Blur,

That is the first post I have seen from you that was worth reading.

In EVERY society there are those who do not have evil intent or act in that manner. We have no argument with them. Our response to the terrorists should and must be specific, targeted and thorough. The problem is getting them separated from the innocents. (After reading some posts regarding the taliban most of the talibs seem to be far from innocent IMO)

The actions taken so far diplomatically are designed to split the terrorists from their support. Since Pakistan seems to be cooperating we might be doing well in that regard.

The mobilization of the GLOBE against terrorism and those who espouse its use will go a long way to deny them sanctuary and help.

Mav

Tuomio, you have proven yourself to be extremely clueless. You might want to stop posting before you show yourself to be a total ass.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18771
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2001, 06:37:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Maverick:

Tuomio, you have proven yourself to be extremely clueless. You might want to stop posting before you show yourself to be a total ass.

Too late for that Mav ...the guys a real piece of work. In my present state of mind, I'd love to have a "face to face" discussion with him.
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #12 on: September 15, 2001, 08:41:00 PM »
We should enlist as many muslims as possible to the cause. We should go after any terrorism everywhere that our friends also suffer from.

 The people of Afghanistan are in a very bad position. They suffer under Taliban. If we go after Ladin/Taliban, those fellows will use them as human shield to the utmost.

 Before we persuade them we are helping them, we have to reach understanding with them and that may not be possible.
 I wish I knew what could be done about it.

 miko

Offline Cleaner

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25
      • http://www.msn.com
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2001, 10:07:00 PM »
I have given this ordeal a great amount of thought. We are in a true catch 22 situation, if we do not not act and try to negotiate his capture there will be further terrorist attacks. If we go after him with a united front we will also have terrorsit attacks.

My biggest fear is NBC attacks in the USA if we go after him, also, if we dont go after him. Bin Laden has shown that life means nothing to him, other then himself. As Americans, or for that matter, any other Country that raises his dander will have more of there citizens killed. Now, I feel is the time to remove bin laden from the face of this earth and all his followers. There will be many deaths of both U.S. and other supporting countries as well as the Taliban and the people who are behind this Idiot. It's not going to go away either, until terrorist's are exterminated.

Patrick Swayze coined the phrase in Next to Kin that so reminds of the U.S.

You think your bad don't ya!!!

No sir, you ain't seen bad yet, But It's Coming!!!!!!!!!!         Cleaner

Offline easymo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1640
Afghani Perspective
« Reply #14 on: September 15, 2001, 10:38:00 PM »
My problem with the "Its not the people. Its the leader" argument has always been the same.  History has proven, time and again, that one or two men who are willing to trade there lives to do it, can kill anybody.  After all, these rodents have shown no reluctance to trade there lives to kill unsuspecting people.  Yet within the millions of people that live in these country's, there is not one man willing to trade his life to take one of these guys out.  So, it comes down to a matter of will. If they don't have the will to remove these men, we do. If we are forced to kill civilians to do it...Well, they made there own bed.