When my daughter was born, to satisfy my liberal wife and sterilize the incessant debate, my 1911 .45 acp went to my brother. It went with him in Oregon. My old mossberg 12g went to my Father-in laws.
There are no weapons currently in my house.
I shoot every once in awile with friends using their stuff at a range.. I'm way outta practice, but like riding a bike, a few rounds brings back the instinct and brings up to the forebrain the training and conditioning.
My kid grew up, the Mossberg is rusted junk, the .45 is MIA. I read the paper, watch the news, I'm feeling a bit itchy. I don't fear the folks in my neighborhood, and I've never felt an overpowering need to carry concealed. But I am concerned that in a very few years, those that don't have may never have a weapon.
Considering the probablility of 'need' forces a careful consideration of the circumstances of need.. possible point defense, but more likely mobility security.. defense while in vehicle or cross-country on foot. Logistics forces a careful rethink of traditional considerations.
I'd like your best considered advice regarding the nature and selection of weapons for such circumstances. The qualifiers are cost and likely availabilty of ammo, concealability for one weapon, 'reach' and durabilty and ease of slinged carry for the long gun. Both must be robust. Weight is an issue. Speed of deployment is an issue. If both the cancealed and long gun use the same ammo, that would be a big plus, as long as it can be easily aquired... would consider a carbine here. Not having much luck finding an ideal 'pair' of weapons.
Thanks!