Originally posted by lazs2
six.. holden explained it. It is not immoral to drink. It is immoral to drink till you can barely function and then get into a car and hurt someone.
I am not sure that it is immoral to destroy an embryo but I feel it is immoral to destroy a viable human being who is innocent and causing no threat to anyone.
to simply say that if you can't see it then it's not a human is wishy washy in the extreme. No no... that is just fat or a tumor... It doesn't look like a person to me....
cowardly? yeah... cowardly pretty much describes it.
If we are overcrowded and need to thin the population then we could start with the prisons. Legal firms could be thinned considerably as could polititions.
lazs
Well, then we agree that the more you drink, the less morals you have?
There is a group here that, on one hand says that it is the murder of a fetus and it is wrong, then on the other hand says it is ok to murder a fetus in another situation. If you are going to argue that it is the murder of an innocent fetus, how can you say it is ok to murder a fetus in the same sentence? Talk about walking the fence huh?
As you state many times lazs, any partial ban leads to more bans. Like if you ban assault rifles, then they try to ban more and more guns til you can no longer choose to own a gun