Author Topic: What happened to LW? (Read 23216 times)

Wilbus · « **Reply #360 on:** December 05, 2005, 10:09:11 AM »

I see a slight difference between the chart and AH.

Krusty · « **Reply #361 on:** December 05, 2005, 10:37:42 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Wilbus
I see a slight difference between the chart and AH.

Crumpp · « **Reply #362 on:** December 05, 2005, 12:40:02 PM »

Quote

Speed vs flap deployment for 109E. These speed/flap deployment figures remained virtually unchanged for all 109 variants.

Frustrating thing is that has been posted several times in this thread alone. Many times over the past few years.

It will be ignored in spite of the overwhelming factual and anecdotal evidence of both the LW fighters ability to use "combat flaps". Which is almost as funny as the claims of engineering incompetacy of the part of the Messerschmitt, Focke Wulf, or whatever the axis firm happens to be under discussion on these boards at the time.

Anyone ever notice that whenever an original document is produced, there are scores of rank amatuer calculator jockey's rushing out of the woodwork presenting their "proof" that the document is wrong.

How about this one?? The report concludes the duraluminum produced in the US was inferior. Even more interesting is the fact it is backed up by the Wright AeroEngine companies own investigations into German Metallurgy.

http://img45.potato.com/img.php?loc=loc231&image=cca_page1.jpg

Repeat after me.....

There is NOTHING wrong with the modeling of any LW fighter so quit "Luftwhining".

All the best,

Crumpp

Morpheus · « **Reply #363 on:** December 05, 2005, 01:22:23 PM »

Speed vs flap deployment for 109E. These speed/flap deployment figures remained virtually unchanged for all 109 variants.

Krusty · « **Reply #364 on:** December 05, 2005, 01:26:56 PM »

You just posted that

Morpheus · « **Reply #365 on:** December 05, 2005, 01:28:07 PM »

Yes, yes I did.
Yes, yes I did.

Crumpp · « **Reply #366 on:** December 05, 2005, 01:46:29 PM »

Quote

It will be ignored

Pyro · « **Reply #367 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:04:51 PM »

The flaps on the 109s were supposed to be changed in the 2.06 and it was an oversight that it wasn't.

Morpheus · « **Reply #368 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:05:47 PM »

Thanks pyro.

Wilbus · « **Reply #369 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:13:16 PM »

OH! Kwel!

Crumpp · « **Reply #370 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:15:04 PM »

Quote

The flaps on the 109s were supposed to be changed in the 2.06 and it was an oversight that it wasn't.

Great!

Any word on the FW-190's getting fixed?

All the best,

Crumpp

Kermit de frog · « **Reply #371 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:16:16 PM »

I think I'll give the luftwabble planes a try after they redo the flaps

storch · « **Reply #372 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:31:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Kermit de frog
I think I'll give the luftwabble planes a try after they redo the flaps

oh no you don't

Stang · « **Reply #373 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:37:07 PM »

Stay in your Typhoon, Fwoggie.

Wilbus · « **Reply #374 on:** December 05, 2005, 02:57:20 PM »

Frequent Hizooka dweebs are not alowed in LW planes.

Author Topic: What happened to LW? (Read 23216 times)

storch