« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Ground Vehicles  (Read 2307 times)

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #30 on: November 24, 2005, 02:30:36 PM »
YES!!!!!!!!

we need more GV's for Tour of Duty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We cant have a Tour of Duty combat sim aimed at the 8th Air Force over western Europe in 1943 WITHOUT GVS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

we MUST have a japanese tank and more russian tanks to make this work!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Schatzi

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5729
      • http://www.slowcat.de
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #31 on: November 24, 2005, 02:36:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
YES!!!!!!!!

we need more GV's for Tour of Duty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We cant have a Tour of Duty combat sim aimed at the 8th Air Force over western Europe in 1943 WITHOUT GVS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

we MUST have a japanese tank and more russian tanks to make this work!!!!!!!!!!


Furball, dear, .... are you feeling well? :D
Logged
21 is only half the truth.

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #32 on: November 24, 2005, 04:38:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Schatzi
Furball, dear, .... are you feeling well? :D


just fine :D
Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #33 on: November 24, 2005, 08:50:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
YES!!!!!!!!

we need more GV's for Tour of Duty!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We cant have a Tour of Duty combat sim aimed at the 8th Air Force over western Europe in 1943 WITHOUT GVS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

we MUST have a japanese tank and more russian tanks to make this work!!!!!!!!!!

I would have to disagree, although would be nice.

YES (as you state) we should just have tons and tons of fighters to furball over some make believe target.
Of course all the Festers, AKAK's, kappa's, Savage's, Furball's, Stangs, Shawks and many,many other ace pilots will pretty much destroy anyone that gets within striking distance, but this all sounds fun.
Logged

Offline DoKGonZo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1977
      • http://www.gonzoville.com
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #34 on: November 25, 2005, 02:18:13 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Aces High is NOT a Flight Sim, it is a WWII Combat Sim.  Well, according to Dale anyways.  I'll stick with the Developer of the game.


Then they better fire whoever named the game.
Logged

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #35 on: November 25, 2005, 04:58:36 AM »
"Then they better fire whoever named the game."


It's just that, a NAME, not a description
Logged

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #36 on: November 25, 2005, 10:46:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MOIL

YES (as you state) we should just have tons and tons of fighters to furball over some make believe target.


when did i say that?
Logged
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Max

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7818
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #37 on: November 25, 2005, 11:44:50 AM »
JMFJ, welcome to Aces High and the HTC UBB!

The GV v AC debate has been going on since day one.

 Keep in mind a couple of things, Hitech, Pyro (HTC) and a lot of the folks here all date back to Air Warrior, which began as a DOS air sim back in the days when 9600 baud was lightening fast speed. While AW went on to incorporate GV's  into the scheme of things, 99% of the players were in planes.

At which point HT launched HTC and AH went open beta,  there was a "ground/mud" market emerging from the WW2OL sim. Although the majority then and now, of HTC subscribers prefer air combat, ground and naval artillary were brought into the game. The AC/GV balance will probably shift somewhat once Tour of Duty goes live. Until then, keep in mind that HTC is a very small company with limited resources which has managed to create and sustain a top notch product at a very reasonable rate.
Logged

Offline DoKGonZo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1977
      • http://www.gonzoville.com
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #38 on: November 25, 2005, 01:45:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MOIL
"Then they better fire whoever named the game."


It's just that, a NAME, not a description


Wow. Do you work in the press office of the White House?
Logged

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #39 on: November 25, 2005, 07:28:28 PM »
GVs are an afterthought. Amusing, but an afterthought nonetheless.
Logged
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

storch

  • Guest
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #40 on: November 26, 2005, 03:39:53 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DoKGonZo
Wow. Do you work in the press office of the White House?
actually he works in back at a chinese laundry in san francisco.
Logged

Offline EN4CER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 598
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #41 on: November 26, 2005, 10:33:15 AM »
Patience young padawan. More GVs will come. I anxiously await the arrival of the M4A3 Sherman and the Jagdpanzer IV as do others. Would be nice too if HiTech added M26 Pershing to counter Tiger. You’ll be surprised how many squads now participate and rely on GV tactics to capture bases – LTARs, SEs, Dirty 30, and of course DEA. Despite it’s name the game format to me has always been a WWII combat simulator – Air, Land, and Sea. There’s more to the ground game now then the average player realizes. Funny, I never hear the Ground Pounders picking on the Flyboys – it’s always the other way around.

Gateway 700 Series Desktop Loaded - $2,750
Optonline Account - $40 a Month
CH Products Joystick - $105
CH Products Throttle - $105
Aces High Account - $15 a Month
Putting a 75mm round (with your Panzer) in the cockpit of some fighter jock that just tried to bomb you and watching him cry on 200 Channel – PRICELESS.

Anyways – welcome to the forum JMFJ.
Logged

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #42 on: November 26, 2005, 05:31:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
when did i say that?


Just commenting on the "YES" part of the post. Not so much the amount of planes, sorry should have clarified.:o
Logged

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #43 on: November 26, 2005, 05:38:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DoKGonZo
Wow. Do you work in the press office of the White House?

Funny how you can go buy or download IL2 Sturmovik and Oh, WAIT, the NAME of the game is IL2 Sturmovik, but yet there are numourus different kinds of planes in the game & GV's  Not just IL2's.........  hhhhhmmmmmmm
Logged

Offline DoKGonZo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1977
      • http://www.gonzoville.com
Ground Vehicles
« Reply #44 on: November 26, 2005, 07:10:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MOIL
Funny how you can go buy or download IL2 Sturmovik and Oh, WAIT, the NAME of the game is IL2 Sturmovik, but yet there are numourus different kinds of planes in the game & GV's  Not just IL2's.........  hhhhhmmmmmmm


Your brilliance leaves me speachless.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »