Ground Vehicles

[JMFJ]

Furball: Alright what war was won in the last 100 years without ground support Ooooooh.....LOL.  So there can't be any confusion, WON=meaning controlling the territory in full.

Stang: Don't fly to low, or I'll have to show you this cool trick I learned in my ostwind.  It involves my cannons and your lancasters wings falling off hehehehe.  I call it "My Stang Wing Fell Off"

I don't know what's better looking forward to the new addition of gv's, or reading the furballers posts squirming over the subject.

JMFJ

[BlueJ1]

rabble rabble rabble!!!

[Dead Man Flying]

JMFJ has sold me.  Since AH is all about actual war, and since it simulates actual war with incredible fidelity, I believe that the focus should turn to the actual heroes of modern-era combat: ground vehicles and good old GI Joe himself.  Thank you for opening my eyes, JMFJ!  For the first time in my life, I can clearly see that air combat takes second fiddle to actual, honest to God boots on the ground in a game called Aces High.

-- Todd/Leviathn

[Shane]

shaddap!  you can still have fun blowing stuff up!!

[Karnak]

Originally posted by JMFJ
I don't know what's better looking forward to the new addition of gv's, or reading the furballers posts squirming over the subject.

I'd be counted as a "furballer", but I still want to see more GVs.  Labels are a silly thing.

[JMFJ]

Sweet.....I've turned leviathn it's only a matter of time before the dark side over whelms you all muuuuhhhhhhaaaaaahhhhhaaaaaa.  That was much easier than I thought it would be to capture the furball King.  Now it's only a matter time for the rest of you.

Come on now leviathn (read my posts) I never said that gv's should take the spot light.  I just wanted some more vehicles as options to level the playing field on the ground, nothing more nothing less.  Since the anti's (I stopped using furballers) don't participate in the gv's anyways then why do you and the other obvious anti's care whether they add a gv or not?

I wonder.............Hmmmmmmmmm m............Maybe it's cause these anti's are afraid that their edge/status in the game won't be as effective as it once was.  Just cause you learned how to be a top ace doesn't mean you get to quit learning, growing with the game is one of the features that makes AH2 unique.  Even if they added 20 gv's tomarrow you think the furballing will cease to exist, highly unlikely.  I still believe that no matter how many gv's are included in the game the planes will still be the most used and probably appreciated.

JMFJ

[Dead Man Flying]

I have no problems at all with adding more ground vehicles.  In fact, I think adding more is a great idea.  I think most people would agree even if they don't use them very much.

-- Todd/Leviathn

[Guppy35]

Originally posted by mussie
Nice tank fuby, but I thought you were anti GV...?

I think that GV's play an important roll here at least to HTC... Have you looked at the number of panzers in the tour stats.

[B]TOP 10 Models By Number Of Kills[/B]

Model Kills Deaths Kills / Deaths + 1
Panzer IV H 73037 76474 1.0
La-7 31224 26245 1.2
Ship Gunner 27118 93 288.5
N1K2 25617 22506 1.1
Ostwind 23800 13866 1.7
Spitfire Mk V 20464 21373 1.0
Tiger I 18667 3248 5.7
Typhoon IB 17487 11855 1.5
P-51D 16742 17356 1.0
SeaFire 16215 15374 1.1

OK so it does not show how many were actually used and it could be a poor statistic to base the assumption on but .

The panzer got 2.3 times the number of kills the LA got....  and there are a hell of a lot of LA's in there so there must be quite a few panzers

I dont think  AH would have the same Player base with out the GV's...

Thats just my opinion though

[/B]

Perk the Ship gunner!