Originally posted by Crumpp
Grits,
It is a mute point now as the arena is not even up to test again or check settings.
It is a moot point because the man who wrote the coad says there is no setting that can cause what some have felt. He also says that he did not remodel or change the 190's, P-38's, P-47's, 109's or any other flight model of a plane that existed before any patches which did feature new 3D models and new aircraft types unless it was noted in the release notes.
Some of my squadmates said they thought the K-4 was slower than the old G-10, or that the roll rate was not what it was. I tested it and found them identical in every way, every testable flight characteristic on any plane that someone has said they "feel" there was a change, I found there was none. No, stability is not measurable, it is inheirently a subjective quality, but given what I have found on testable traits of aircraft behavior that have been claimed to have changed and have not, why should I believe it has? When the massive preponderance of testable evidence I have seen clearly proves nothing has changed why should I believe something has changed just because it cant be tested? Thats just illogical.
I believe you and others that say they can feel changes, I think you are wrong, but I do believe you, however, just because someone believes something does not make it true. Although I may state my view strongly sometimes, it is not personal towards you or anyone else.