Author Topic: has anyone flown the 190A5 lately? (Read 2665 times)

storch · « **on:** November 30, 2005, 06:41:47 AM »

go and fly it against a spitV or even a spitVIII. the CT would be a good venue this week, until Friday when the set up changes. please post your impressions/results here.

Crumpp · « **Reply #1 on:** November 30, 2005, 07:49:02 AM »

I noticed a huge improvement.

Still checking it out, though.

All the best,

Crumpp

MANDO · « **Reply #2 on:** November 30, 2005, 09:50:13 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Crumpp
I noticed a huge improvement.

A5 has been improved?

Angus · « **Reply #3 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:05:26 AM »

Wot?
Well off I go, checking

Sable · « **Reply #4 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:19:55 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by MANDO
A5 has been improved?

I think HT modified it's 0beca1p setting!

Krusty · « **Reply #5 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:35:26 AM »

Neg, it's not the A5 that's changed. It's the SpitV. A5 outperforms the V a bit better now. Other than that, it's the same 190 we've had since the last major patch (when the 190s were redone I mean)

Karnak · « **Reply #6 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:36:04 AM »

Storch,

I have not since v2.06 has been released. What changes do you notice? I'll give it a go tonight though.

Quote

Originally posted by Sable
I think HT modified it's 0beca1p setting!

It's what?

storch · « **Reply #7 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:38:59 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Krusty
Neg, it's not the A5 that's changed. It's the SpitV. A5 outperforms the V a bit better now. Other than that, it's the same 190 we've had since the last major patch (when the 190s were redone I mean)

I'm not so sure, it's more about a change in the balance/CG and the way the plane stalls or more importantly how it doesn't. I'm able to pull it much further in high AoAs and not viciously drop the right wing. but it coulde be as you say as well.

Krusty · « **Reply #8 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:45:27 AM »

It's been that way since the 190 models were redone (and yet the official word is "no FM changes were made".

storch · « **Reply #9 on:** November 30, 2005, 10:53:35 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Krusty
It's been that way since the 190 models were redone (and yet the official word is "no FM changes were made".

I'll take your word on it Krusty but I play the model almost every day and I first noticed it monday. I kept my opinion to myself and flew it exclusively yesterday. It is playing very pleasently and balanced. It wasn't prior to monday at least not to the extent we are currently experiencing, for me anyways.

Krusty · « **Reply #10 on:** November 30, 2005, 11:00:40 AM »

Ah, well I fly it often myself as well, but had not noticed any new changes. I thought what you were describing was the change we felt when the 190 3D models were redone.

chunder' · « **Reply #11 on:** November 30, 2005, 12:06:05 PM »

If you notice a change in how the 190's fly and can't figure out the reason you might want to look at the way the fuel is loaded and used now versus the older versions of AH...

Mime · « **Reply #12 on:** November 30, 2005, 01:45:22 PM »

A5 felt really good to me too when I flew it. But then again I never really flew the A5 much, only the A8. The A5 still isn't as amazing around the stall as the uber 51s and 47s though

Krusty · « **Reply #13 on:** November 30, 2005, 02:25:16 PM »

A8 still sucks arse. Can't even pull a loop well. I was struggling very hard against a spit16 and an la7 in the a8, in a situation where an A5 would have killed 'em both easily and kept on going.

TDeacon · « **Reply #14 on:** November 30, 2005, 11:03:16 PM »

A5 seems same to me.

Author Topic: has anyone flown the 190A5 lately? (Read 2665 times)

storch

storch

storch