Author Topic: Fleet Changes  (Read 2298 times)

Offline APDrone

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3384
Fleet Changes
« Reply #15 on: December 14, 2005, 05:57:56 PM »
Oh.. I thought it was Big Boat

::runs and hides from all the navy veterans::


Jester, Thanks for the info!  Neat stuff!
AKDrone

Scenario "Masters of the Air" X.O. 100th Bombardment Group


Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Fleet Changes
« Reply #16 on: December 14, 2005, 06:17:49 PM »
BC is the code for battlecruisers as I understood it.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline viper215

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1076
      • http://www.bops.us
Re: Fleet Changes
« Reply #17 on: December 14, 2005, 06:40:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by APDrone
Did a search and found a reference to turning, but I think the rest are new.

1. Elevate the 5" guns on the CA to shoot over the main batteries at low targets.

2. Change the air raid siren to naval 'general quarters' alarm.  here

3. Add a turn warning siren that can be heard in tower, deck, and hangar.  Primarily useful when in the hangar deciding what craft to use. I have the sound running through my head, but I can't find it, nor figure out how to describe it.  I could record a vocal rendition of it.. but I don't want to risk vioating one of the posting rules.. particularily about abusive behavior..

4. When all DDs, CA, and CV are destroyed, disable troops at the fleet.


1. Are you talking about in the cruiser cause the 5in gun cant shoot over 8inch

2. That would just get innoying hearing that

3. That would be to many things running at the same time (ie the naval alarm)

4. Nothing should be able to up when carrier down. PT boats and LVTS spawn from nothing
- Viper215 - Birds of Prey - Falcon Wing -
               - www.bops.us -

Offline NoBaddy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2943
      • http://www.damned.org
Fleet Changes
« Reply #18 on: December 14, 2005, 10:38:42 PM »
1. No. Like the planes, it is modeled after the real thing.

2. Don't really care, since I turn off the audio warnings anyway (massively annoying)

3. Like this idea.

4. No way!!! That would end the LVT/PT frenzy that follows each CV sinking....wadda hoot!!! :)
NoBaddy (NB)

Flying since before there was virtual durt!!
"Ego is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity."

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
Fleet Changes
« Reply #19 on: December 15, 2005, 01:52:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
BC is the code for battlecruisers as I understood it.


The "CC" code was exclusive to the USN as the prefix for it's own Battlecruiser type and was only ever applied to the Lexington Class ships as far as I know. Most other navies during Pre & WW2 did I believe use the "BC" prefix.

In 1915 when the design studies were started for the USN's only Battlecruisers - the LEXINGTON CLASS -  and construction was started they were given the "CC" prefix to their numbers.

USS LEXINGTON CC-1  (Converted during construction to Aircraft Carrier CV-2)
USS CONSTELLATION CC-2  (Canceled, scrapped 22.7% complete)
USS SARATOGA CC-3  (Converted during construction to Aircraft Carrier CV-3)
USS RANGER CC-4  (Canceled, scrapped 4% complete)
USS CONSTITUTION CC-5  (Canceled, scrapped 13.4% complete)
USS UNITED STATES CC-6  (Canceled, scrapped 12% complete)

When the WW2 era ALASKA CLASS was designed they at first received the "BC" prefix and were pretty much known as "Battlecruisers." Before construction started the were reclassified as Large Cruisers "CB". I think this had to do with their role mainly as a Carrier Escort than as earlier Battlecruisers usually used as scouts for the Battle Line.

Quote
Originally posted by APDrone
Jester, Thanks for the info!  Neat stuff!


No Prob - glad to share all my useless info with the masses.  :D
« Last Edit: December 15, 2005, 02:00:25 AM by Jester »
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Fleet Changes
« Reply #20 on: December 15, 2005, 05:51:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Jester
The "CC" code was exclusive to the USN as the prefix for it's own Battlecruiser type and was only ever applied to the Lexington Class ships as far as I know. Most other navies during Pre & WW2 did I believe use the "BC" prefix.


Wouldn't CC stand for Combat Cruiser instead?

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
Fleet Changes
« Reply #21 on: December 15, 2005, 09:37:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by frank3
Wouldn't CC stand for Combat Cruiser instead?


All the material I have on the LEXINGTON CLASS has always called them "Battlecruisers" and I don't think I have ever heard of the designation "Combat Cruiser" - at least not in the USN ship designations.

:aok
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline 2Hawks

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 530
      • http://daniel.clanbaker.com
Fleet Changes
« Reply #22 on: December 15, 2005, 04:25:43 PM »
my wish is that this conversatoin could move on to an appropriate location.

Dan.

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
Fleet Changes
« Reply #23 on: December 15, 2005, 04:40:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 2Hawks
my wish is that this conversatoin could move on to an appropriate location.

Dan.


Obviously not as you took time to read it and waste yours and our time by posting. If you don't like the conversation move on to another post or post something else.
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline viper215

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1076
      • http://www.bops.us
Fleet Changes
« Reply #24 on: December 15, 2005, 06:34:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by NoBaddy
1. No. Like the planes, it is modeled after the real thing.

2. Don't really care, since I turn off the audio warnings anyway (massively annoying)

3. Like this idea.

4. No way!!! That would end the LVT/PT frenzy that follows each CV sinking....wadda hoot!!! :)



mayby we can just have a flashing light in hanger :p :p :p :p :p
- Viper215 - Birds of Prey - Falcon Wing -
               - www.bops.us -

Offline 2Hawks

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 530
      • http://daniel.clanbaker.com
Fleet Changes
« Reply #25 on: December 15, 2005, 10:26:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Jester
Obviously not as you took time to read it and waste yours and our time by posting. If you don't like the conversation move on to another post or post something else.


If *You* Took the time to read the posts you would noticed I have contributed constructively. My latest post is about how this thread has gone way off topic. The topic is alarms and sounds for different bases. (Or fleets) NOT the naming of the various ships.

Consider it a suggestion to start another thread in the general topics. Doesn't belong in the "wishlist" unless we are asking for Battle Ships to wield.

You need not get your feathers ruffled. Unless you feel like you need a ruffling. Then there's the MA or Oprah for that...


Dan.

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
Fleet Changes
« Reply #26 on: December 16, 2005, 03:48:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 2Hawks
If *You* Took the time to read the posts you would noticed I have contributed constructively. My latest post is about how this thread has gone way off topic. The topic is alarms and sounds for different bases. (Or fleets) NOT the naming of the various ships.

Consider it a suggestion to start another thread in the general topics. Doesn't belong in the "wishlist" unless we are asking for Battle Ships to wield.

You need not get your feathers ruffled. Unless you feel like you need a ruffling. Then there's the MA or Oprah for that...


Dan.


Damn Dude, does it "REALLY" bother you that bad? GEEZE!  :huh
I think you need to take up the last line of your own suggestion above.

Prozac or Viagra will do wonders for you. Give it a try.  :aok

BTY - HAPPY HOLIDAYS!  ;)
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline wylieboy

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 114
Fleet Changes
« Reply #27 on: December 16, 2005, 05:11:40 PM »
I say "aye" on the sounds:aok