Author Topic: The Latest 9/11 conspiresists (Read 1694 times)

Wolfala · « **Reply #30 on:** February 14, 2006, 12:24:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by indy007
Conspiracy theories stem from the fact that people do not want to willingly accept the simple explanation. Two symbols of America brought down by a group of men armed with the simplest of tools, driven by religion and hate, fueled by terrifying determination... or....

A very complex plot involving oil companies, the president, drone aircraft, all the passengers being government employees (now in hiding), hidden explosives, saudi nationals, halliburton, and weapon releases from USAF interceptors.

I'd almost like to see one of these "experts" tell somebody who had a relative in the towers, on the first 2 planes, on flight 93... that their relative is part of the conspiracy and either wasn't on the plane, or didn't exist to begin with.

Better yet...

Tell them it was 'gods will'

That'll get an interesting response.

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #31 on:** February 14, 2006, 01:24:14 PM »

Sandman, I don't know if you were trying to disprove me, but you proved what I said...

beet1e · « **Reply #32 on:** February 14, 2006, 01:47:21 PM »

conspiresists?

Don't you mean "conspirators" ?

Sandman · « **Reply #33 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:09:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lasersailor184
Sandman, I don't know if you were trying to disprove me, but you proved what I said...

I don't understand how Farid Alfawak-hiri is being misquoted or wrong. His statement agrees with yours and every other quote I've posted since then.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #34 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:19:11 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by beet1e
conspiresists?

Don't you mean "conspirators" ?

A conspirator is one who conspires. A conspiresist (apparently a newly coined word, to my knowlege first seen in this thread) would be one who subscribes to conspiracy theory. That's what I get from it anyway.

Hangtime · « **Reply #35 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:21:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
A conspirator is one who conspires. A conspiresist (apparently a newly coined word, to my knowlege first seen in this thread) would be one who subscribes to conspiracy theory. That's what I get from it anyway.

Nope.. Stephen Colbert came up with that word first.

Sandman · « **Reply #36 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:25:32 PM »

I believe Hang speaks truthiness.

indy007 · « **Reply #37 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:27:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
I believe Hang speaks truthiness.

Great word. Can't believe others were trying to take credit. Glad Colbert set them straight

Seagoon · « **Reply #38 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:30:17 PM »

Hi all,

Actually it's rather a blessing that the Twin Tower's structure failed in the way that it did so that they both came straight down. If either building had toppled in the way that both the Hijackers and the '93 WTC bombers had hoped they would the devastation in surrounding city blocks would have been enormous and the death toll much higher. As it was, the surrounding buildings in Liberty Plaza all suffered serious structural damage. Of course not falling at all would have been the best option, but few skyscrapers could have survived that level of damage.

- SEAGOON

Hangtime · « **Reply #39 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:30:33 PM »

best talking head show on cable!

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #40 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:47:47 PM »

I know "truthiness", but I didn't know Colbert came up with "conspiresist" too. I watch the Colbear repore more often than not and hadn't heard him talk about "conspiresist". He broke up over the cute "Bennifer" type name for Bill Macy and Felicity Huffman the other night and it's the first time I've seen him unable to keep his straight face.

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #41 on:** February 14, 2006, 02:51:00 PM »

My bad, for some odd reason I thought the first guy was giving numbers in Celsius.

icemaw · « **Reply #42 on:** February 14, 2006, 03:21:45 PM »

Web site designed by Osama Bin Arsewhole and his team of islamist for the destruction of all infadells even the ones that belive this crap we just posted on this web site!

AND THATS THE TRUTH!

RAIDER14 · « **Reply #43 on:** February 14, 2006, 05:14:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Seagoon
Hi all,

Actually it's rather a blessing that the Twin Tower's structure failed in the way that it did so that they both came straight down. If either building had toppled in the way that both the Hijackers and the '93 WTC bombers had hoped they would the devastation in surrounding city blocks would have been enormous and the death toll much higher. As it was, the surrounding buildings in Liberty Plaza all suffered serious structural damage. Of course not falling at all would have been the best option, but few skyscrapers could have survived that level of damage.

- SEAGOON

the towers were designed to take a impact from a 707 so the designers thought about a plane impacting the building but unfourtanetly they did not know it would be 767s traveling close to 600mph hitting the towers

707-767 comparison

Comparison 2

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #44 on:** February 14, 2006, 05:50:29 PM »

They were designed to withstand the IMPACT. The post impact fire from FULLY FUELED jets was something they did not account for.