Originally posted by LJK Raubvogel:
RAM- moral character and integrity does not mean that you have to share every little detail of your life with the entire world. The fact that he readily admitted it shows his integrity. A man of low moral character would have tried to cover it up, or tried to justify it. Being a politician does not mean you have to invite the whole world to examine every detail of your life. I am much more concerned with what a candidate plans on doing in the present than what he did over 2 decades ago.
Raub I can agree with you-to an extent.
I agree that he has admited it, and taken the responsability for it...but, then again, he had NO other option, if he still wants to sit down in the W.H.
What could he do? Deny it? only to see how the police archives confirm the story?...
Start some kind of "evasive" explanation? only to see his attacks on Clinton and Gore applied over himself?
He did the ONLY thing possible, I dont say that he hasnt changed, or that he doesnt taste alcohol since his forties. I say that he had NO other exit for it...
--AND THAT HE COULD HAVE AVOIDED THIS SITUATION--...if he knew that this info would be published sooner or later...then why not use it to show that he has nothing to hide?...
Being as it is, now we see a candidate who has used integrity as flag and signal for his campaign, in a quite bad situation. He had no other choice than to do what he did.
His declarations doesnt show his honesty, only shows he has very very good image assessors, and that he is smart enough to follow their suggestions.
BUt I dont see any proof on his honesty here, to be true.
[This message has been edited by RAM (edited 11-03-2000).]