Author Topic: Smoking: Another debate that's over.  (Read 3217 times)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #60 on: June 29, 2006, 08:15:55 AM »
And.... as for saving you all money.....

Sooo... now that smoking is allmost gone....  All of your insurance and expenses all went way down right?   How did you like that huge rebate that the insurance companies sent you?   Bigger even than the rebate they sent for the seatbelt law and helmet law eh?

We are talking about a legal substance here.   If it is that evil.....  go ahead and try to ban it.... you are doing such a great job on drugs.  How many ATF agents would it take to raid a "smoking compound"?

LOL   what a bunch of dos ekks you guys are.....  all you hand wringing suckers and womenly men will get is more cops..... more laws.... and more expense....

you probly deserve it tho...

lazs

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #61 on: June 29, 2006, 08:18:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by weaselsan
Tell you what Nilsen, you post the names of the children killed or maimed by second hand cigarette smoke, and I'll post the names of the children killed or maimed by alcohol...I may not be able to post them all, I'm not sure Hitech has the bandwidth.



why dont you post a list of all the kids you know have not been damaged in any way by second hand smoking in some form

its comon knowledge that its damaging for the fetus to get nicotine thru the mother or living in a home filled with smoke

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #62 on: June 29, 2006, 08:20:15 AM »
weaze.... you can't call em on that!!!!

when they wanted to pass a helmet law in kalifornia... they told of all the injury brain dead bikers in public institutions being cared for in their vegetative states by the pooor public...

They claimed that it cost billions a year to care for these scum who would not wear helmets.

When asked for a list or a count of all these brain dead wards of the state...

No ONE could be found.   they did not exist.

Soon as the law passed....

Motorcycle and car insurance went up 20%.

lazs

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #63 on: June 29, 2006, 08:21:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
And.... as for saving you all money.....

Sooo... now that smoking is allmost gone....  All of your insurance and expenses all went way down right?   How did you like that huge rebate that the insurance companies sent you?   Bigger even than the rebate they sent for the seatbelt law and helmet law eh?

We are talking about a legal substance here.   If it is that evil.....  go ahead and try to ban it.... you are doing such a great job on drugs.  How many ATF agents would it take to raid a "smoking compound"?

LOL   what a bunch of dos ekks you guys are.....  all you hand wringing suckers and womenly men will get is more cops..... more laws.... and more expense....

you probly deserve it tho...

lazs


if everyone stopped today it would take years for the full effect to apear.. is that to hard for you to understand? do i have to explain it to you?

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #64 on: June 29, 2006, 08:22:27 AM »
nielsen... it is up to you to prove it.

And...if it is so bad that you can't even do it in your home then...

Try to get it banned.

I know for a fact that booze is far worse than smoke... costs me a fortune and I don't even drink anymore.  

Why should I put up with all the tragedy and killing and expense of a bunch of ignroant boozers?

oh.... and years?   Here in the states we have had no smoking laws for decades in some places..... where are the success stories?  

Bet a ban on booze would have instant results if you could enforce it.

lazs

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #65 on: June 29, 2006, 08:27:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
nielsen... it is up to you to prove it.

And...if it is so bad that you can't even do it in your home then...

Try to get it banned.

I know for a fact that booze is far worse than smoke... costs me a fortune and I don't even drink anymore.  

Why should I put up with all the tragedy and killing and expense of a bunch of ignroant boozers?

lazs


no doubt that alcohol is bad for you.

here 398 died of alcholo related injuries, while 4669 died of tobacco related injuries or diseases in 2002

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #66 on: June 29, 2006, 08:37:45 AM »
tobaco related INJURIES?

so... does burning one's nipples with a cigar count in that?
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #67 on: June 29, 2006, 08:38:58 AM »
I find that really hard to believe.... allmost every murder here involves booze.... allmost every assault involves booze... most auto fatalities involve booze... most domestic violence involves booze.

Yet... you can sell it allmost anywhere and drink it in public places and even have it in your system around your wives and children and even while driving..  

people even wreck boats on it and it never gets into the stats.

peoples lives are shortened by it... is that booze related?   I want to see what they call smoke related deaths.  

lazs

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #68 on: June 29, 2006, 08:48:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
I find that really hard to believe.... allmost every murder here involves booze.... allmost every assault involves booze... most auto fatalities involve booze... most domestic violence involves booze.

Yet... you can sell it allmost anywhere and drink it in public places and even have it in your system around your wives and children and even while driving..  

people even wreck boats on it and it never gets into the stats.

peoples lives are shortened by it... is that booze related?   I want to see what they call smoke related deaths.  

lazs


acohol related injuries as they call it includes car accidents, murders, liver illness, "streetfights" etc etc. Smoking related are mostly cancer and other resporatory illnesses and actually car accidents. Yes.. some loose their cigs or whatnot and crashies trying to find the things or put it out.

Im not questioning the dangers of alcohol, but smoking is by far a more dangerous activity. Ill say it again.. People can smoke as much as they want to, but dont bother others with it and dont send the bill to everyone else for it.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #69 on: June 29, 2006, 08:50:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saintaw
tobaco related INJURIES?

so... does burning one's nipples with a cigar count in that?


i doubt it will kill you ;)

in your case it prolly gives you loads of pleasure :D

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #70 on: June 29, 2006, 08:57:35 AM »
4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2006, 12:47:02 AM by MP4 »

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #71 on: June 29, 2006, 09:02:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.


Again you prove your worth in any discussion by lowering yourself to namecalling and throwing insults around. Come back when you mature abit lazs.

Have a nice day.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2006, 12:47:23 AM by MP4 »

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #72 on: June 29, 2006, 09:10:38 AM »
4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2006, 12:47:46 AM by MP4 »

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #73 on: June 29, 2006, 09:19:21 AM »
Alcohol consuption is already restricted lazs. The line is drawn.

You cant be caught drunk while caring for children, you cant force kids to drink, you cant be viloent against kids drunk or sober.. You cant disturb people on the street drunk or not.

All of the above are illegal and will get you fined, in jail and/or loose custody of your kids.


My drinking has not affected anyone lazs, except maybe annoy a few folks here... They dont have to read my drunken posts tho ;)

Offline Kaw1000

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1159
Smoking: Another debate that's over.
« Reply #74 on: June 29, 2006, 09:38:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
any of you anti anti-smokers non-smokers yourself?


7- Members should remember this board is aimed at a general audience. Posting pornographic or generally offensive text, images, links, etc. will not be tolerated. This includes attempts to bypass the profanity filter.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2006, 12:42:47 AM by MP4 »
See Rule# 5 on just about every thread!