Author Topic: The war in the mid east is about to start.. (Read 2453 times)

uvwpvW · « **Reply #15 on:** July 17, 2006, 07:49:02 AM »

7- Members should remember this board is aimed at a general audience. Posting pornographic or generally offensive text, images, links, etc. will not be tolerated. This includes attempts to bypass the profanity filter.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #16 on:** July 17, 2006, 08:03:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by uvwpvW
Yes 10 million dead is a huge setback for a nation of 1.4 billion *lol*.

Nations that currently can destroy America in a matter of minutes: Russia, China, France and The United Kingdom.

I’ll put down my crack pipe if you give me some of what you’re smoking. That watermelon must be great!

You obviously have no inclination as to what that dam systems supports. Google it, China's back would be broken. Please stop posting in this thread. 1.4 billion people would not be fighting.

Saintaw · « **Reply #17 on:** July 17, 2006, 08:08:36 AM »

Quote

Please stop posting in this thread.

everyone who dissagrees with Karaya, SHUT UP NOW!!! or...or.... errr.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #18 on:** July 17, 2006, 08:19:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Saintaw
everyone who dissagrees with Karaya, SHUT UP NOW!!! or...or.... errr.

Not quite like that. The Three Rivers Gorge Dam System is a LARGE part of the Chinese Machine. Look at a population map of China, the Yangtze IS the backbone of China. If whatever his handle is, cannot use his nagen and only come up with "EagleEyes is a child". Well that makes EagleEyes look smart.

uvwpvW · « **Reply #19 on:** July 17, 2006, 08:42:59 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
You obviously have no inclination as to what that dam systems supports. Google it, China's back would be broken. Please stop posting in this thread. 1.4 billion people would not be fighting.

What possible bearing does that have on this discussion? China still can destroy America within minutes.

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
If whatever his handle is…

Not smart enough to figure it out? No surprise.

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
…cannot use his nagen and only come up with "EagleEyes is a child". Well that makes EagleEyes look smart.

Are you his mother? You sure act the part.

Chairboy · « **Reply #20 on:** July 17, 2006, 08:59:58 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by uvwpvW
What possible bearing does that have on this discussion? China still can destroy America within minutes.

China has what, 17 DF-5/5A ICBMs? What definition of 'destroy america within minutes' are you using?

Masherbrum · « **Reply #21 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:11:38 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by uvwpvW
What possible bearing does that have on this discussion? China still can destroy America within minutes.

I'm not the one who stated "Today many countries have the ability to destroy America." You did. So please tell me what this point was in the first place since we were talking about the Middle East. I merely countered your OPINION, with a FACT that has more impact and bearing.

Again, please stop posting. I'm beginning to think that Prometheus is your handle.

uvwpvW · « **Reply #22 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:19:18 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Chairboy
China has what, 17 DF-5/5A ICBMs? What definition of 'destroy america within minutes' are you using?

They have 18 DF5s capable of reaching anywhere in the US, and 12 DF4s that can reach the west coast. Each carrying a 3-5 megaton warhead. So what I mean by “destroy America” is the vaporization of 18 east coast and central/south population centers and 12 west coast population centers. The rest of the country would be radiated – the severity depending on weather conditions. For all intents and purposes America would be destroyed.

Granted, the destruction would not be as complete as if Russia, France or Britain attacked.

john9001 · « **Reply #23 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:25:19 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by uvwpvW

I believe Iran was the most powerful Arab nation, then and now. Not that I think the result would be any different.

Iran is not Arab, Iran is Persian

so take that Mr smartypants.

uvwpvW · « **Reply #24 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:25:40 AM »

See Rule #4

Masherbrum · « **Reply #25 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:29:39 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by uvwpvW
See Rule #4

Ok, if you wanted to keep things between the two of you, then you should have PM'd him.

uvwpvW · « **Reply #26 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:35:41 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
Iran is not Arab, Iran is Persian

so take that Mr smartypants.

HA!

I stand corrected.

john9001 · « **Reply #27 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:41:08 AM »

let me see if i got this right. 1/2 of chinas exports go to the USA so china is going to destroy 1/2 of it's export market with nukes?

oh brother , you need to get into the 21st century.

Saintaw · « **Reply #28 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:42:06 AM »

china doesn't need WMD to f*** us. All they needs is to get every citysen to stomp their feet at the same time... think about it, a brazillion chinese going "thump thump"... we're doomed DOOMED!!!

uvwpvW · « **Reply #29 on:** July 17, 2006, 09:42:40 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
Ok, if you wanted to keep things between the two of you, then you should have PM'd him.

Why would I want to “keep things” between him and me? He posted an argument on a public forum and I responded to it. That’s how these “things” work. You are free to respond to any of my posts if you want to, but please in the future read the whole thread and try to make rational arguments.