Author Topic: If you could add one plane which would it be???  (Read 8660 times)

Offline Kurt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1149
      • http://www.clowns-of-death.com
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #120 on: August 26, 2006, 01:18:33 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Widewing

For the Soviet fans: Yak-3
Widewing


Oh, that would be a fun addition.  They have a non-airworthy YAK-3 at the local CAF Museum here in S. California.  Interesting little bird... Very very little.  It makes the Spit 14 look like a 747.
--Kurt
Supreme Exalted Grand Pooh-bah Clown
Clowns of Death <Now Defunct>
'A pair of jokers beats a pair of aces'

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #121 on: August 26, 2006, 05:29:39 AM »
i am wondering, given advances in techonology, if it wouldnt be a waste to add anything too unworthy in a battle.  meaning, would it even make sense to add an early war plane before adding a later one?

would it satisfy your need for speed?

just curious.
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline Blixen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
      • http://475thfg.bravehost.com/
Can We Atleast Have1 French Plane???
« Reply #122 on: August 26, 2006, 08:32:41 AM »
after all france was apart of the war
and the d.520 faught the b4 and after the capture
hell germans even used them for trainers

Crew: One
Length: 8.7 m (28 ft 8 in)
Wingspan: 33 ft 6 in (10.2 m)
Height: 2.6 m (8 ft 5 in)
Empty weight: 2,090 kg (4,608 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 2,780 kg (6,129 lb)
Powerplant: 1× Hispano-Suiza 12Y-45 liquid-cooled V-12, 690 kW (930 hp)
Performance
Maximum speed: 529 km/h (329 mph)
Range: 1,250 km (777 mi)
Wing loading: kg/m² (lb/ft²)
Power/mass: kW/kg (hp/lb)
Armament
1x 20 mm cannon
4x 7.5 mm machine guns
« Last Edit: August 26, 2006, 08:36:48 AM by Blixen »

Offline Husky01

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4844
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #123 on: August 26, 2006, 11:49:02 AM »
I like the idea of a french plane alot :)
BearKats
9GIAP VVS RKKA

Offline uberhun

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 761
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #124 on: August 26, 2006, 12:12:27 PM »
Ju87-G

In the Russian front, a new version of the Stuka was developed, the Ju-87 G was no longer a dive bomber. Instead it was equipped with two 37mm anti-tank guns. Although these guns were no longer effective in ground use against the front thick armor of the modern Russian tanks, they were still very lethal against the much thinner rear and top armor of those tanks. This was basically the German equivalent of the Russian Sturmovik which also used to attack German tanks from the rear. The Stuka excelled in this new dedicated anti-tank role too, although it remained easy prey for fighters. A total number of over 5700 Stuka dive bombers were produced, and until the end of the war there was no new German dive bomber which replaced it.

World War 2 produced quite many German aces, and some of them survived long enough and excelled so much that they had almost unbelievable records. Their ever increasing combat achievements, and repeated acts of bravery, were such that the German military used a score system to award its heroes with medals, and new higher levels of the Knights Cross medal were introduced, representing ever higher scores. Of the top group of German war heroes, which included mostly fighter pilots and submarine captains, the highest decorated one, the only recipient of the highest level of the Knights Cross medal, was a Stuka pilot, Hans Ulrich Rudel.
Rudel personally destroyed 519 Russian tanks, and a huge number of other targets, in over 2500 combat missions over the Russian front. He also committed several acts of great bravery, including landings in enemy territory and in the battlefield to rescue downed comrades by taking them back in the small cockpit of the Stuka. In one of those rescue attempts, Rudel's Stuka was stuck in mud, so he and his gunner and comrades had to escape the chasing Russian soldiers on foot all the way back to German lines.  

Hans-Ulrich Rudel was born on July 2nd 1916 in Konradswaldau, Silesia. He was the son of a clergyman. In contrast to his later accomplishments and bravery his childhood was rather peaceful and mundane. He was an average student and fairly timid. His only passion which he developed upon in later years was his love for athletics. This led to his becoming a master of the decathlon. His many accomplishments in school as well as a member of the Hitler youth led many to believe that he had a future at the Olympics. After his final exams, however, he wanted to become a commercial pilot.

His father did not have the financial means to support his ambitions. The desire to fly led him to enlist in the Wehrmacht. He began his basic military training on December 4th 1936. During mid 1937, pilot training followed. He was transferred to Graz-Thalerhof in June of 1938 as an officer cadet with the first Gruppe of Stukageschwader 168. There, he flew the Ju-87 for the first time. Things were not the way he would have liked. He was referred to by his superiors and fellow cadets as a “head case”. He stood by his old principles; early to bed; drink only milk and no ladies please. On can imagine how fellow pilot cadets would react to such an individual. When the war began he could not wait to be sent to the front. He was repeatedly turned down and instead of going through channels he applied directly to the Headquarters of the Luftwaffe (Reichsluftfahrtsministerium). In order to quiet this thorn in the side, he got his wish.

He flew 2530 missions against the enemy. Whilst doing so he destroyed 519 Russian tanks, a battleship, a cruiser, a destroyer, 70 landing craft, over 800 motorized vehicles, over 150artillery, anti-tank and anti-aircraft positions. Furthermore he destroyed important bridges, supply lines and bunkers. (One can increase these numbers since many of his missions were flown without the knowledge of the Reich’s leadership and the tallies were assigned to the Geschwader. Hitler forbade his flying because he did not want him lost to the propaganda machine). Rudel was shot down 30 times, and he was wounded 5 times. He also saved six crews downed behind enemy lines and escaped once from Russian captivity. He was decorated with the highest award for bravery in the German armed forces. He received the golden oak leaves with swords and diamonds to the Knights Cross. His iron will was remarkable.
 



:aok

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #125 on: August 26, 2006, 12:43:33 PM »
IAR series (probably 80A and 81C)
P-39D/P-400 (differed in only the cannon mounted)
P-40N
Ki-43
Ki-44
Ki45
D4Y
G4M
A6M3
J2M
B6N
Ju52
He-111
He-177
D.520
Ms.406
Blenheim
B-25C and/or J
B-17E/F
B-24D
SB2C
TBD
More Italian Planes
More Russian Planes...
etc etc etc

Way too many to pick one.




How about getting everything (especially the Hurris and P-40s) up to the visual standards of the P-51, P-47 and P-38 series we now have before worrying about anything new?
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline lambo522

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
      • http://www.613th.com
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #126 on: August 26, 2006, 02:06:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by JB88
whatever.  i would like to see the B-29.

the nukes would be a historically accurate bonus.

it's just not that retarded.

a bomb is a bomb is a bomb.


Yeah, but only a nuke can continue to cause damage 20 years after it's dropped...that's why the nuke is just plain retarded to even think of putting in the game.  The B-29 was not as efficient a bomber as everyone likes to think.  Sure, it had A LOT of tech advances over it's older and aging counterparts, but she had many bugs of her own, ranging from the guns not working in unison, to engines flaming out (a nearly EVERY flight occurance), to sights not being accurate enough for the alt. that they flew at.  Yes, I too would absolutely LOVE to see the B-29 enter the arena, and perked much higher than the lame AR234s(aka-USELESS POS)...but with absolutely no need for nukes.  If you could nuke a field, then you have to think of the after effect...you can't use that field again...ever...under any circumstance.  Radioactivity does NOT "just go away."  Long story short, yes, that was a retarded extreme JB88.

Me personally, the only reason I want to see the B-29 enter the game is because she was a BEAUTIFUL bomber...none before, or since has matched it's beauty in my mind.  And I'd like something to actually spend my perks on...the 234 is the only available at the moment...and it's worthless.

I could go for the bird dog though...that would be fun for FAC purposes...like gunners attacking something 9k out.

Offline CHECKERS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1187
      • http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/1502/index.html
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #127 on: August 26, 2006, 03:11:19 PM »
LA 9   :t




   Bob/CHECKERS
Originally posted by Panman
God the BK's are some some ugly mo-fo's. Please no more pictures, I'm going blind Bet your mothers don't even love ya cause u'all sooooooooo F******* ulgy.

Offline MIShill

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 182
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #128 on: August 26, 2006, 06:08:16 PM »
We need a French plane as a drone, like the old c-47s in Air Warrior. Let one loose occassionally to fly around to be randomly killed. Should get a vox message- "Vive la France!" & a scream as it goes down.
-MI-

Offline Husky01

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4844
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #129 on: August 26, 2006, 06:38:44 PM »
:lol
BearKats
9GIAP VVS RKKA

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #130 on: August 26, 2006, 07:36:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lambo522
Yeah, but only a nuke can continue to cause damage 20 years after it's dropped...that's why the nuke is just plain retarded to even think of putting in the game.  The B-29 was not as efficient a bomber as everyone likes to think.  Sure, it had A LOT of tech advances over it's older and aging counterparts, but she had many bugs of her own, ranging from the guns not working in unison, to engines flaming out (a nearly EVERY flight occurance), to sights not being accurate enough for the alt. that they flew at.  Yes, I too would absolutely LOVE to see the B-29 enter the arena, and perked much higher than the lame AR234s(aka-USELESS POS)...but with absolutely no need for nukes.  If you could nuke a field, then you have to think of the after effect...you can't use that field again...ever...under any circumstance.  Radioactivity does NOT "just go away."  Long story short, yes, that was a retarded extreme JB88.

Me personally, the only reason I want to see the B-29 enter the game is because she was a BEAUTIFUL bomber...none before, or since has matched it's beauty in my mind.  And I'd like something to actually spend my perks on...the 234 is the only available at the moment...and it's worthless.

I could go for the bird dog though...that would be fun for FAC purposes...like gunners attacking something 9k out.



oooooh...so you mean that the whole, city rebuilds itself after having to be completely leveled to the exact last buiding before you can get exactly 10 troops in there is really following the actuality of a warfare environment?

sorry man, but it doesnt work that way either now does it...hangers dont just "rebuild themselves exactly 10 minutes after they have been blown to smithereens in real life either.

this is a game.  

the bomb was developed by the US and deployed by the US air force and served as a major contributor to the outcome of the war.

it's just not that bad of an idea...and it certainly isnt retarded or worth the unseasoned pork that one seems to have to wade though to even discuss it.

sure, i can see where we could get into all sort of ethical questions regarding its deployment.  (for a HUGE amount of perks) you just wouldnt see it all that often after most have thrown away thier bomber perks and tried it out.

perhaps what bothers people is the idea that something external can just come along and blow them up without thier being able to stop it without being prepared or get out of its way when it goes.

but thats war man. and it is what actually happened.
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #131 on: August 26, 2006, 08:11:53 PM »
I'm glad everyone finally realized how awesome the SCW planeset would be. :D

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #132 on: August 26, 2006, 08:17:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kurt
Oh, that would be a fun addition.  They have a non-airworthy YAK-3 at the local CAF Museum here in S. California.  Interesting little bird... Very very little.  It makes the Spit 14 look like a 747.


Wikipedia has a pretty decent write up with specifications and details on the Yak-3  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yak-3

It would be a fun little ride.

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #133 on: August 26, 2006, 08:20:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by CHECKERS
LA 9   :t

Bob/CHECKERS


"The new fighter, officially designated La-9, entered production in August 1946. A total of 1,559 aircraft were built by the end of production in 1948"


Sorry, a post-war fighter if there ever was one. Prototype wasn't even finished until 1946.

Offline aztec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1800
If you could add one plane which would it be???
« Reply #134 on: August 27, 2006, 07:19:09 AM »
Ki-43 Oscar