Author Topic: Changes to come.  (Read 40594 times)

Offline 2Slow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
Changes to come.
« Reply #555 on: December 13, 2006, 02:36:35 PM »
See Rule #4 (you were doing ok until that last line)
2Slow
Secundum mihi , urbanus resurrectio
TANSTAAFL

Offline Edbert

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2220
      • http://www.edbert.net
Changes to come.
« Reply #556 on: December 13, 2006, 02:38:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Stiletto
We will move as a group if we have to, to keep our squad and our extended circle of friends intact. We've done it before, and we'll do it again if we have no other options. Please don't put us in that position.

All this statement means is that you are willing to "move as a group" to a different game but not to a different chesspeice. Now that individual threats of quitting are not getting you you're way, you've resorted to entire squad threats?  LOL

Offline 2Slow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
Changes to come.
« Reply #557 on: December 13, 2006, 02:41:55 PM »
What Stiletto said.

DITTO
2Slow
Secundum mihi , urbanus resurrectio
TANSTAAFL

Offline Triumph

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 116
GREAT!
« Reply #558 on: December 13, 2006, 02:42:20 PM »
Just when you think it can't possibly get any worse...


What  Stiletto said. Well put brother.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2006, 02:48:58 PM by Triumph »
<<<Triumph>>>

Offline TW9

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1118
      • http://www.tedwilliams.com
Changes to come.
« Reply #559 on: December 13, 2006, 02:43:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Stiletto
We will move as a group if we have to, to keep our squad and our extended circle of friends intact. We've done it before, and we'll do it again if we have no other options. Please don't put us in that position.



Bye :aok
Quote from: sax
The community lacks personality , thank #@# for TW9 or
there would'nt even be anyone --------- left .
Quote from: Krusty
Edit2: BAN the ass-hat. That's not skuzzy, that's a tard named TW9

Offline 2Slow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
Changes to come.
« Reply #560 on: December 13, 2006, 02:43:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 2Slow
See Rule #4 (you were doing ok until that last line)


"Where the Sun don't shine"

I thought I kept it rather clean.
2Slow
Secundum mihi , urbanus resurrectio
TANSTAAFL

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Changes to come.
« Reply #561 on: December 13, 2006, 02:46:39 PM »
Stiletto: The change does in no way threaten the squad base. You are viewing things in a very micro chasm.

1. You assume it will be the norm for squads not to be able to fly together.
2. You assume to have a successful squad you must ALWAYS fly together.
3. You assume squads will not adjust to be able to fly together.
4. You assume a static non growing population.
5. You assume I already do not know about the interactions of squads.
6. You assume I do not have other ideas in the works (don't ask I will not tell)
   that also will effect things.
7. You assume that squads no matter how large increase player retention.
8. You assume that squads are the only item that increase retention and attract players.
9. You assume that if nothing had changed people do not leave for other reasons.
10. You assume that to have fun with your squad, every member must be able to fly together.


My point is, that I very well understand the attractions and need for social aspect of a "Squad". But also understand there are other needs that have to be balanced with the needs of squads.

HiTech

Offline 2Slow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
Changes to come.
« Reply #562 on: December 13, 2006, 02:52:25 PM »
"I never thought I would see the day where people were mad that they had to fight in a combat sim." --Mars01

"There's a clear line of difference between people who organize themselves to win a war, and sheep who flock to each other to avoid the wolves." --Kweassa

"They’re paying $15 not to fight; you’re paying $15 to fight. Sounds like in some situations, the best action is right here on the BBS." --MachNix


Last edited by Edbert on 12-13-2006 at 01:27 PM

Well said Edbert.  The entire point.  Waaaaa...I got killed because I initiated a 1 v 4 attack.  Or because my SA or skills had an issue and I did not extend out of a 4 v 1 attack.

I do rather well in Buffs.  I can have my days in a figher.  GV's can be fun.  I can also have a bad day in all 3 of them.  My fighter skills are very rusty (allowing that I ever had any :) )
2Slow
Secundum mihi , urbanus resurrectio
TANSTAAFL

Offline MWL

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 426
Changes to come.
« Reply #563 on: December 13, 2006, 02:52:28 PM »
Greetings,

  BTW, thanks for your comments Htech - and taking time to read others.  You have way more patence (sp) than I and are obviously very interested in the comments on this thread.

  Can we have just a hint of the other things so we can start even more 'end of AH as we know it' threads?

:noid

Regards,

Offline Airscrew

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4808
Changes to come.
« Reply #564 on: December 13, 2006, 02:55:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by hitech
My point is, that I very well understand the attractions and need for social aspect of a "Squad". But also understand there are other needs that have to be balanced with the needs of squads.HiTech

Or to quote Spock
"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few"

Offline 2Slow

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 720
Changes to come.
« Reply #565 on: December 13, 2006, 03:20:33 PM »
See Rule #2, #5
« Last Edit: December 13, 2006, 04:55:09 PM by Skuzzy »
2Slow
Secundum mihi , urbanus resurrectio
TANSTAAFL

Offline SKDenny

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42
      • http://216.12.31.149
Changes to come.
« Reply #566 on: December 13, 2006, 03:51:59 PM »
Quote
and you are coming across as someone who is "madly flailing the sword while his ship is going down."

<> Kev [/B]


I think that you just described AH at the moment
SKDenny

Offline Excaliber

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 104
Changes to come.
« Reply #567 on: December 13, 2006, 03:53:57 PM »
Deleted
« Last Edit: December 13, 2006, 04:10:38 PM by hitech »

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Changes to come.
« Reply #568 on: December 13, 2006, 04:04:08 PM »
Deleted
« Last Edit: December 13, 2006, 04:12:10 PM by hitech »
See Rule #4

Offline Excaliber

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 104
Changes to come.
« Reply #569 on: December 13, 2006, 05:32:56 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: December 13, 2006, 06:05:03 PM by Skuzzy »