Author Topic: Global Warming (Read 16502 times)

GtoRA2 · « **Reply #300 on:** February 08, 2007, 10:49:16 AM »

Yeah when the global climate change scare mongers can accurately predict weather just one week away, I might start worrying about their predictions for the next decade.

Angus · « **Reply #301 on:** February 08, 2007, 11:49:43 AM »

Welcome to the fray with great and logical inputs like
"woooo....weeerrrrkkk.......wu uuuuuuu"

Yknurd · « **Reply #302 on:** February 08, 2007, 12:18:19 PM »

I can't wait until I can blame Pelosi for global warming.

Sabre · « **Reply #303 on:** February 08, 2007, 12:27:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Yknurd
I can't wait until I can blame Pelosi for global warming.

Go ahead. No need to wait.

john9001 · « **Reply #304 on:** February 08, 2007, 01:13:54 PM »

for the first time in a decade the coast guard has closed the rivers in Pittsburgh because of ice, one river has 4 to 8 inches of ice.

and now back global warming.

straffo · « **Reply #305 on:** February 08, 2007, 01:51:38 PM »

local <> global

lazs2 · « **Reply #306 on:** February 08, 2007, 02:00:59 PM »

so straffo... if the GLOBAL temp stayed the same or got a little less this year or next... and we continued to do whatever it is you think we are doing to warm up the planet as humans....

Then you would admit that we are not having any effect worth worrying about?

lazs

straffo · « **Reply #307 on:** February 08, 2007, 02:56:18 PM »

Sure if the trend is not present any more I will say go ahead.

But else ?

What should we do ?
Wait another year and another and another until it's too late ?

There is an old adage in France saying : "little stream make big rivers"

Making a little effort is not very costly and can be started today if we discover it was not necessary it won't matter as doing this little effort we are rewarded by some saving.

Sabre · « **Reply #308 on:** February 08, 2007, 03:09:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
Sure if the trend is not present any more I will say go ahead.

But else ?

What should we do ?
Wait another year and another and another until it's too late ?

There is an old adage in France saying : "little stream make big rivers"

Making a little effort is not very costly and can be started today if we discover it was not necessary it won't matter as doing this little effort we are rewarded by some saving.

Kyoto is not what I'd call a little cost. It's economic impact is world-wide and long-term.

john9001 · « **Reply #309 on:** February 08, 2007, 03:12:30 PM »

what little effort thats not very costly that can be started today?

old indian saying "white man use many words but say little".

Angus · « **Reply #310 on:** February 08, 2007, 03:46:32 PM »

I'm afraid that this pittsburg river will amount very little compaing to the vast ice melted in the arctic, - and while at it, not cooling the ocean.

indy007 · « **Reply #311 on:** February 08, 2007, 03:57:34 PM »

mmmm Kyoto. Nothing like spending $300 billion to potentially save 0.003 degrees by 2050.

john9001 · « **Reply #312 on:** February 08, 2007, 04:13:19 PM »

angus, straffo says the arctic ice melt is only local.

Angus · « **Reply #313 on:** February 08, 2007, 04:34:09 PM »

Arctic + Arctic = very big local.
All the rivers in all of N- America are but a wee pee compare to the mass of the arctic areas.
And, I do not see this local claim from Straffo.

GtoRA2 · « **Reply #314 on:** February 08, 2007, 04:41:40 PM »

Has earth first put a church for your religion up on your island yet Angus? You would make a great preacher!