Author Topic: Triple Buffs Should GO  (Read 10253 times)

Offline SuperDud

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4589
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #300 on: March 23, 2007, 06:47:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by 999000
Superdud, Hub, and Mars,........You state I have a "good guy " reputation..I supose there are reasons for that. You state you don't care about your  or the BK's reputation......I suppose there are reasons for that.
Mars my ugly head as you state only comes out when people like Hub earliear  in this post blatantly lie.
Mars just to jar your memory the Bk's didn't ask or request  hangers not to be dropped ....being polite is not a Bk trade mark......If I remember correctly it was in the most disrespectful, intimadating, and bullying nature you guys went off on a fellow bomber pilot who was on the same team.
I suppose there are reasons for ones reputation.
999000
Well you couldn't be more wrong. Go try to find a post were I belittle someone. You might get lucky and find 1(and only 1) but I doubt it. When you belittle the BKs you belittle me and I take offense to that. It's as if I said everyone who's flys bombers is a skilless waste of time who should just quit. Why don't you step back and not mark everyone from a particle group as a certain "type". As for the bomber pilot you speak of, I haven't a clue. Once again you use a wide brush with no real right to do so. Say what you want, but with post like these I find you much worse than what any BK could ever be. That's why I find your reputation as a "nice guy" undeserving.
SuperDud
++Blue Knights++

Offline tatertot

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 691
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #301 on: March 23, 2007, 07:46:13 AM »
i wouldnt give this a thought ,but hub please leave me out of this one
do i think there are some fixes for these issues yes,will they make them yes,when its justified for all

but remember one thing you fix one thing another needs adjusted,1 2 3 buffs i dont care people will still do what you think they are doing now again

killling buffs isnt that hard with a little thought and patience i now i die alot
i would just like not be mentioned when ever this crap gets put out there i do fly fighters some uno

ty and
« Last Edit: March 23, 2007, 07:59:23 AM by tatertot »
THE NAME TATERTOT IS NOT FROM MY FAV FOOD !!!!!!

Offline tatertot

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 691
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #302 on: March 23, 2007, 08:04:24 AM »
Sorry i got off track i went back and read the first 3 posts are we talking about guns of bombing in this,i think someone somewere stated that a hgnr ,cv,town hardning effect equal to lethelness of buffs would be the answer,tree top into a base is not a option anymore look at the ack performance as we have to date,cvs are to easy anyway ask anyone,higher alt just gives 5incers more accuracy anyway so in case if we take away 3 buffs take away auto ack and 5 incers.See were im going for every quirk theres another side quark,htc  has made many changes to everything in the game and so to will thewe be fixed
THE NAME TATERTOT IS NOT FROM MY FAV FOOD !!!!!!

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #303 on: March 23, 2007, 08:13:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hubsonfire
But using your E6B during the setup for your pass, you can still simply watch until your speed stabilizes, then calibrate, and the readout in the sight is irrelevant, because you know that through the E6B. Net effect of removing the display- 0.


How do you know what speed you are calibrated to?  You figure you can just open the E6B, calibrate, and be 100% accurate every time?  Maybe you can with practice, but a little jump during the calibration and you are off a few mph, and more importantly, you dont know it by looking at the bombsight and comparing it to your E6B.

Easy laser sighting is possible because you match your E6B to the speed indicated in your bombsight, whatever your calibration skill.  Those that have better calibration skills SHOULD have better accuracy.  Right now, you can do a quick, dirty 2 sec calibration and use the throttle, E6B, and bombsight speed display to correct for your lack of calibration skill, or your extreme high altitude, and hit every time.  Without that bombsight display, the chance of error increases, especially at high altitude, which is what we need.

EagleDNY
$.02

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #304 on: March 23, 2007, 10:59:32 AM »
I know if my speed is stable, my calibration will be fine, regardless of what my speed is. I don't even use the display in the bombsight. It's not skill or practice. There's only 2 things you have do when calibrating- keep your speed steady, and have the crosshairs on the same spot when you press the button, and when you let off.

Let's ask ourselves, what would the game be like without formations? What would change? CVs would have to be sunk by jabos, PTs, or torp planes? Bomber missions would fly at realistic alts, or with escorts, or maybe just in large groups like we used to? It wouldn't be worth the trouble for many people to hunt them, since they'd only get 1 kill, and the threat of one bomber destroying a field or CV is far less than 3 of them.

What would the game breaker be? What is it that I'm missing that would keep you from flying bombers ever again?
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline 4deck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
      • (+) Precision
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #305 on: March 23, 2007, 11:29:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by hubsonfire
I know if my speed is stable, my calibration will be fine, regardless of what my speed is. I don't even use the display in the bombsight. It's not skill or practice. There's only 2 things you have do when calibrating- keep your speed steady, and have the crosshairs on the same spot when you press the button, and when you let off.

Let's ask ourselves, what would the game be like without formations? What would change? CVs would have to be sunk by jabos, PTs, or torp planes? Bomber missions would fly at realistic alts, or with escorts, or maybe just in large groups like we used to? It wouldn't be worth the trouble for many people to hunt them, since they'd only get 1 kill, and the threat of one bomber destroying a field or CV is far less than 3 of them.

What would the game breaker be? What is it that I'm missing that would keep you from flying bombers ever again?


This is a joke. Period. And heres my example. The knights ahve been flying alot more missions in fairy large numbers. And thats due to people flying bombers. Where do u say like we used to fly large groups.

THis thread is a joke. and if the formations were to change I gurantee that you should see a signigificant change inthe bomber community fo rme included. I would also suspect that my squad would also go the route of starting to lose intrest. We would probable just try it out, then it would peter off. and you can have your game back i guess. Franky this thread is ridiculus. Havent seen this much controversy since the Areana split. And all u have to do is look at the great change that did. Now you have 2 areana which are practically unused, and 2 areanas that are full, and we have a hard time getting in to play with friends.
Really this thread at this point needs a moderator to come in and just say were looking into the change or t wont change. Frankly im outta it, just dont want to see anymore nerfing.

Later im out
Forgot who said this while trying to take a base, but the quote goes like this. "I cant help you with ack, Im not in attack mode" This is with only 2 ack up in the town while troops were there, waiting. The rest of the town was down.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #306 on: March 23, 2007, 11:32:46 AM »
Wooot thinly veiled arena split wine.


Arena split = The gift that keeps on giving.

:D

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline tatertot

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 691
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #307 on: March 23, 2007, 11:46:16 AM »
i have done the wed senerios were your buffs spawn or fall into a certain altitude,would this be a fix?then with a speed and or bomb sight vertical only (no diving buffs)maybe a little fix

anyone else remember how those senerios work were you spawn in>??its been a long time since ive attended one may be a thing of the past

as i stated i am not against any of the issues you and many even myself have,the real question is there are many gamey things in the game so lm just comenting on one aspect here,gvs pts they spawn so no spawn jokes!

one more thing i was told im owned by skyrock so dont blast me!!!
THE NAME TATERTOT IS NOT FROM MY FAV FOOD !!!!!!

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #308 on: March 23, 2007, 11:47:59 AM »
Thank you floatsup. Another strong argument from the canned response probomber lobby. :rolleyes:

Tater, I think we can agree that of the things that put gameplay over realism, bombers are going just a bit far. One player can nuke a V base, or sink a CV, with little to no effort or skill required. You don't think that is upsetting to the general balance of things?
« Last Edit: March 23, 2007, 11:51:16 AM by hubsonfire »
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline tatertot

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 691
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #309 on: March 23, 2007, 12:34:43 PM »
i think you are right on.I just think its something that everyone has a opinion on and i think alot of ideas on the bb are great for it,most people in fighters will not attack a buff form because of the guns unless some jerk and i will use me  as a example is flying straight into the furbal

i agree alot of the buff stuff is gamey way gamey,i stated that cv hgngers and such should be hardened in someway i by no means am against anything stated in this post,i just think going back to the old 1 buff bomb sight idea is a thing of the past because of the guys who would fly buffs,its kinda a no win issue unless they implement some of the ah2ers ideas,dont take them out make it harder somewere ie speed load perks level armmenent and such

1 last thing though no matter what they fix or not fix someone will figure out how to do what they do,i fly buffs because i dont seem to have the patience to figure out fighters i enjoy the fight to the base am i good at bombing probaly not am i a good shot in one buff i cannot remember 3 yes but i no deep down i have6x3 sets of guns on board but i still get killed by the patient pilots.so it works i guess        o yeah if we wouls have the skillless gv base and cv kills would this mean suicide porkers and or armement on attack planes also?
THE NAME TATERTOT IS NOT FROM MY FAV FOOD !!!!!!

Offline mars01

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4148
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #310 on: March 23, 2007, 12:55:21 PM »
Quote
Superdud, Hub, and Mars,........You state I have a "good guy " reputation..I supose there are reasons for that. You state you don't care about your or the BK's reputation......I suppose there are reasons for that.
Mars my ugly head as you state only comes out when people like Hub earliear in this post blatantly lie.
Mars just to jar your memory the Bk's didn't ask or request hangers not to be dropped ....being polite is not a Bk trade mark......If I remember correctly it was in the most disrespectful, intimadating, and bullying nature you guys went off on a fellow bomber pilot who was on the same team.
I suppose there are reasons for ones reputation.
999000


Your memory is far from good 999.  The problem you had back when you through your hissy fit and left the knights, was you didn't have a clue as to who was doing the "disrespectful, intimadating, and bullying ".  It was meddog.  Then I flew in a min later, asked why did you bomber guys drop the FHrs when we had a large cap and the VH and city were still up.  At that point you blew a gasket and all your nice guy crap went out the window.

And no it is not your reputation that is good, it is just your perception you give off with your "sir this" and "sir that" crap as long as people are doing what you want them to do.  Go against you and we, HT and most others that have witnessed your tantrums know your  real rep.

Now I am not into drudging old wounds that have healed, but you are the one spewing crap not us.  You don't like the retourt stop spewing BS from your lips.  :aok


Now back to your regularly scheduled programming.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2007, 01:25:09 PM by mars01 »

Offline 999000

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 891
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #311 on: March 23, 2007, 10:00:15 PM »
Thanks Mars,.....I think Your right....not only did we have one member of the community trying to bully in the rudest way I have ever seen  a fellow bomber pilot..but your right ..you then  piggyback making a terrrible situation worse.
Mars you state I'm a nice guy as long as people are doing what I want them to do.......Funny You choose to be horride because you were worried a vulch fest might end...in psychology 101 this is call projection...blaming others for the very thing you are guilty of.
Mars in regards to the "sirs" etc.. I don't have a problem with being polite,  and positive, always have been always will be.
Mars I have also seen a hundred different ways bases have been captured....I have also seen a hundred different ways bases have fail to be captured.... Its good to know you know everything...including how the rest of us should play the game.....YOUR WAY....
Thanks for bringing the details up.
999000

Offline mars01

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4148
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #312 on: March 23, 2007, 11:48:52 PM »
Dude your out of control and completely fabricating a story here.  All I said verbatim that night was, "Why did you bomber guys drop the Fhrs when the VH and City are still up and we have a complete cap over the field?"  And I probably have the film to prove it.

I'm not projecting you are fabricating.  You started this purse fight by attacking the BKs and now you are continuing your delusional rant.  Your not fooling anyone 999 at least anyone that has seen you act the way you do when you lose it.  Personally I think it is pretty funny, so carry on.  :aok

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #313 on: March 24, 2007, 03:23:04 AM »
I had an internet outage.

(in no particular order) Mars, 999000 & al. why don't you PM yourselves instead?

Quote
Originally posted by hubsonfire
To take the opposite tack, moot, why do we even have formations?

Hub, like I said before and like it has been proven in the past (hence Hitech's decision to add formations in the first place), bombers are too easy to kill when flying single-ship.

Bombers flew in formations in reality.  This is not a "that's how it was" two-bit excuse, it's refering to the simple fact that bomber design for the B17, 24 etc (not the Il2 and others, duh) was intended for formation flying and bomb dropping.  Not dive bombing, not single-plane (which you advocate) laser-accurate drops, but large formations to ensure target hit, and survival.
Target hit is a given in AH, since the calibration and dispersion is easy (easier than in reality), so in that sense we would need less bombers to compensate for that plus the fact that there aren't that many targets to match such mass carpet bombing; except for a second major factor: surviving fighters.
Mass bombing raids had to deal with interception by fighters and flak as you know, and in AH this largely offsets the damage bombers can reciprocate, almost single-handedly because of the number of fighters available to simply swarm them when they deem it interesting..

We need formations because bombers would simply be too easy to kill.  Because without them, bomber accuracy would have to go up in compensation for the reduced volume of bombs dropped.

And because, hubs, (probably) the whole point of this game is trigger time.  You are asking for less trigger time, rather than an accomodation of not-unrealistic bomber modeling (formations, higher dispersion, more difficult calibration (btw where the heck went storm fronts?), more shaking from the gunner positions, less perfectly smooth ride in flight).
You're asking for nerfing rather than more fun, more instagib rather than longer actual fighting leading up to the fragging conclusion.

As for single players being able to ruin a VH.. well that's the same as dying repeatedly to a good gunner, or Lev in dogfights.. would you nerf the spit5 or admit you've simply met your match?
You meet your match in hangar(etc)-killing bombers when you fail to adapt beyond simply furballing, and just refuse to account for the few minutes it takes to set up a foolproof attack on them.  All it takes is two wingmen with the right, simple tactics to wrap it up in a few minutes...  there are easily at least two fighter planes willing to fry a big lumbering target for every bomber formation in the MA.

Bombers need these: more dispersion, a slightly more difficult calibration that doesnt give new players too hard a time (btw fighter flying is tougher to learn than bombers), but rewards perfect handling, less perfectly smooth gunner aim and ride in the air, and to offset all these, two more drones, if the netcode etc can take it.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Triple Buffs Should GO
« Reply #314 on: March 24, 2007, 12:54:56 PM »
Moot, I'm not sure where you got the reasons for formations being added, but if I'm understanding you, you're asking for 5 plane formations with no other changes. A calibration routine simple enough that new players can do it without difficulty?

If you can't blindly hit something with 90,000 pounds of ordnance, it can't be hit at all. Do you really think 5 planes will result in any less divebombing, sinking of CVs, or trashing of fields? With that much ord, there's no way 90% of those guys are even going to bother calibrating.

How easy does the game have to be made in order for these guys to play it?

And what does being killed by a player with years of experience have to do with being able to wipe out  a field in one pass on autopilot without having to do anything? The guys like lev worked at it, they practiced and setup controls and worked on tactics and gunnery. Random buffer noob just hits x, o, and stabs b repeatedly as he flies over the Vbase. That's a horrible analogy.

HT says that their goal is the make sure the most people have the most fun possible, but bombers allow the least people to have the best chance to affect the most people, with the least effort. Explain to me how that's good. I'm not seeing how it can be.

"fail to adapt beyond simple furballing". Oh, please. Stick to speaking of things that you actually know something about. This topic doesn't seem to be one of those things.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2007, 12:59:59 PM by hubsonfire »
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech