Author Topic: 8 Good reasons to vote A-26  (Read 1750 times)

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« on: March 29, 2007, 07:04:34 PM »



A wall of lead @ 353 mph
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline Gatr

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 292
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2007, 07:09:00 PM »
OHHH YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.,,,

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2007, 07:11:34 PM »
But...but...but........



You forgot about the other SIX reasons in the wings!!!!!!!


Offline wojo71

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 294
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2007, 07:35:02 PM »
Oh great! just what we need ,Cobia38  in a A-26 . He will be a one man wrecking crew:cry . That being said I say A-26 all the way baby!:aok
LTARwojo        
Proud father of a U.S. Marine....Proud grandson of Lt Col Hamel Goodin (ret)   B-17 pilot. 305th BG /364th SQD

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7295
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2007, 07:37:10 PM »
greaaaaaaaaaat, anoooother american bomber.  Not having 6 is enough?  What's next? The B-29 with perked NUKES? :D
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2007, 07:39:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mister Fork
greaaaaaaaaaat, anoooother american bomber.  Not having 6 is enough?  What's next? The B-29 with perked NUKES? :D



The  "A"  stands for attack plane

A  "B" would be for a bomber, like the B-26





alphabeticaly yours,

Boner
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline -SR-

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 159
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2007, 07:54:53 PM »
Go Vaders:aok


-SR-

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #7 on: March 29, 2007, 08:31:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mister Fork
greaaaaaaaaaat, anoooother american bomber.  Not having 6 is enough?  What's next? The B-29 with perked NUKES? :D


Yeah.  And the reason it is the ONLY American plane I push for.  A perk-worthy buff ride.  Otherwise, go G.55!

But think of how much FUN that 'Vader would be!

14 forward firing .50's!  Turn on tracers, spend perks for the drones, and you is a one player frame rate killer anywhere you go.  You fire.  They don't just explode.  They Disco!

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2007, 08:43:58 PM »
Chances are strong that either B-25 or A-26 will have a solid nose, and no drones.

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #9 on: March 29, 2007, 09:48:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Chances are strong that either B-25 or A-26 will have a solid nose, and no drones.


I'd expect the A-26 to cost perk points, and one of my big arguments is for a plane for buff drivers to be able to spend buff perk points on, other than the Arado, so allowing drones to create an even larger buff perk point economic sink has merit.  The drones would increase perk price 3x for a flight.  
The drones also allows the Invader to be used as a level penetration bomber, much like the Ki-67's (but costing perks).  It's a versatile multi-role plane, why limit it to only half it's abilities?

Secondly, the typical mission profile of the Invader was for every six planes in a mission, 1 was a A-26C pathfinder with it's norden bombsite, and 5 - A-26B's with gun heavy solid nose.  All planes would drop with the lead pathfinder bomber, in a level bombing attack.  After they dropped their ord, they would normally drop down low and look for target of opportunities.  Even the A-26C's had 8 forward firing .50's for strafing, and they all could carry up to 14 X 5" rockets.

Third, since the only real difference is the nose configuration of the plane, if the A-26 Invader was added, why not both B and C?  It just comes down to a few nose guns and access to norden bombsight.  You could "fudge" by going just solid nose, with norden to compensate for lack of pathfinder bombers, and allowing drones to facilitate the use of the Invader as a penetration level bomber, but I'd much rather see both B and C versions.

Need an Invader with bombsight and drones for level bombing abilities of the Invader.  Whether this is a C-model or a B-model with a site means little difference to me.  And the majority of Invaders built (and retrofitted during the war) were the A-26B with 8-pack in nose and six wing guns, and is the most popular version for use in the game by 'Vader luvers.

Solo A-26B Invaders also have their roles.  Ground attack.  Bomber destroyer.  Deack fields.  Vulch.  Solo CV killer.

Then just adjust the perk price to what works in the Arenas.

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2007, 10:07:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by tedrbr


14 forward firing .50's!  Turn on tracers, spend perks for the drones, and you is a one player frame rate killer anywhere you go.  You fire.  They don't just explode.  They Disco!

That is funny chit!  Sig material!:aok

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2007, 10:23:03 PM »
I agree.


Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #12 on: March 29, 2007, 10:29:45 PM »
no drones!!

this is an attack plane ,  like the 110

cept on steroids!!

no perk either.

the drones would be a cool frame rate buster though!!!



i think this plane would be the most fun out of all the other choices.:D
« Last Edit: March 29, 2007, 10:31:52 PM by 1Boner »
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: 8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #13 on: March 29, 2007, 10:32:12 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 1Boner



A wall of lead @ 353 mph

Mosquito FB.Mk VI:

four 20mm Hispano Mk II and four .303 brownings in the nose and 380mph.

Sorry, I'll take the Mossie.

Oh yes, the Mossie has about 10lbs/sq.ft. less wing loading too.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: Re: 8 Good reasons to vote A-26
« Reply #14 on: March 29, 2007, 10:43:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Mosquito FB.Mk VI:

four 20mm Hispano Mk II and four .303 brownings in the nose and 380mph.

Sorry, I'll take the Mossie.

Oh yes, the Mossie has about 10lbs/sq.ft. less wing loading too.





mossie ain,t in the running for a new plane.

its english , do we have an american attack plane like the mossie or il2?

there,s nothing in the new choices that is better than anything thats available now.

we all got our own opinions

mossies a great plane

A-26 is a great plane too!!

i just think it would add more to the game than any of the other choices.




My 3 cents,

Boner
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP