Author Topic: War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war  (Read 2336 times)

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #45 on: April 11, 2007, 12:35:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Engine
Bombing relatives of combatants is sure to work. It sure made the British surrender in WW2 when London was bombed. Didn't it?


You clearly forget the firebombing and leveling of German Cities, as well as the firebombing and the dropping of nuclear bombs on Japanese cities.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #46 on: April 11, 2007, 12:36:59 PM »
The fact is that he's advocating genocide.  Whether or not his motivations are racial or not really makes little difference compared to the fact that Laser & compatriots are _advocating genocide_.  That's the stumbling point.

I would like to hear a response to the London blitz comparison, though...

EDIT: Oops, and there it is.  So the fact that his example of nuclear strike is related to a war against a government instead of a fight against decentralized groups with religious motivation is beside the point, I suppose.
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #47 on: April 11, 2007, 12:42:40 PM »
Genocide is the killing of a people because of who they are.


I advocate violent retribution for their actions.  I really don't care who they are.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline Engine

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1195
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #48 on: April 11, 2007, 12:48:30 PM »
Retribution against who? The people at Mecca and in mosques, who may or may not have anything to do with any acts of terrorism? But they're valid targets because many terrorists share the same religion, is that right?

Rethink.

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #49 on: April 11, 2007, 12:51:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
The fact is that he's advocating genocide.  Whether or not his motivations are racial or not really makes little difference compared to the fact that Laser & compatriots are _advocating genocide_.  That's the stumbling point.

I would like to hear a response to the London blitz comparison, though...

EDIT: Oops, and there it is.  So the fact that his example of nuclear strike is related to a war against a government instead of a fight against decentralized groups with religious motivation is beside the point, I suppose.


The motivation makes little difference. It's the actions that do the damage.

Not all Germans were Nazi's, and not all Japanese were of the bastardized Bushido mindset. In fact many lived in fear of the very regimes that carried out the war. Those same Nazis and Japanese military warlords were going to keep fighting and keep killing the innocent until they had final victory, or the free world did.

Luckily the free world had the will to win then. Now I'm not so sure.

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #50 on: April 11, 2007, 12:53:07 PM »
I'm not sure that a Triumph of the Will is the best solution here.
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #51 on: April 11, 2007, 01:07:15 PM »
How amusing. How quickly people forget.

The LAST time we had people who were trying to take control of an entire region, by force, and commit genocide in the process, we had a nasty little
event  the history books refer to as World War II. In order to end the war, and restore peace and some sort of reasonable order, it became necessary to completely destroy two of the main combatants, including a large portion of their  civilian population.

However, these days, when you have the same sort of thing in the making, no one has the stomach, or the testicles, to do the same thing.

By the way, the idea that Bin Laden and his ilk will be satisfied if the West leaves the area is amazingly naive and stupid. Why do you think they want the  West out? So they can take control. What ever gave you the idea that once they have control, they'll stop there?

Have any of you geniuses ever considered the fact that these terrorists want POWER? Or the fact that anyone who craves power and is willing to gain power  in the manner that they are will never be satisfied with the power they have?

How about this. If they want the U.S. out, or even the West in general, then why the Hell are they killing other Muslims of different sects? I mean, Hell, if that makes sense, why did the U.S. go to Europe or the Pacific? We could have just started killing the Canadians. It makes about as much sense for the U.S. to have responded to Pearl Harbor by killing Canadians as it does for the Sh*ites to kill Sunnis to get the West to leave.

And by the way, if your position is that the events of 11 September 2001 were brought on simply because the West is in the Middle East, and the West is not wanted there BY SOME, and that the West should leave in response, then get ready for some group of whackos to kill a few thousand every time they have some sort of demand, and you can acquiesce to those demands as well. Se where that gets you.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline wetrat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2117
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #52 on: April 11, 2007, 01:13:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
You sure as hell can win the war on Terror.

It's called Total War.  The other side loses when they realize how ****ed they are because they messed with us.



I bet an Nuclear ICBM doing circles above Mecca would win the war pretty ****ing quick.
This is one of the most ignorant things I've read on these forums. Bravo, lasersailor, bravo.
Army of Muppets

Offline Torque

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2091
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #53 on: April 11, 2007, 01:15:46 PM »
yeah...such an innocent bystander, it's just happenstance that today's terrorists were yesterday's employees.

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #54 on: April 11, 2007, 01:29:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
I'm not sure that a Triumph of the Will is the best solution here.


There's going to be a Triumph of the Will when this war ends. I really believe this  Choirboy.
One way or the other. This isn't a war that's going to end by appeasement, a cease fire, or a Camp David Accord. I believe as Holden that even if we pulled completely out of the M.E. this thing won't end. All we'd do is give them reason to believe that more attacks would bring more success.

In the mean time we have Soldiers and Marines fighting, dieing, and coming home missing limbs, or worse, because we don't have the will to win. The will of the enemy isn't breaking, the will of our service people isn't breaking. The will that's breaking is the very people who they are out there fighting for.

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #55 on: April 11, 2007, 01:37:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
How amusing. How quickly people forget.

The LAST time we had people who were trying to take control of an entire region, by force, and commit genocide in the process, we had a nasty little
event  the history books refer to as World War II. In order to end the war, and restore peace and some sort of reasonable order, it became necessary to completely destroy two of the main combatants, including a large portion of their  civilian population.

 


"Last Time"?  Where have YOU been?   The phrases "never again" or "not on our watch" haven't meant anything since 1945.  Yugoslavia, Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, Darfur, Uganda, Ethiopia, Burundi, Angola, China, Indonesia, Tibet, Cambodia,..... genocide is the national sport in some parts of the world.  

If you want the body count: http://www.genocidewatch.org/aboutgenocide/genpolmmchart.htm


Quote
By the way, the idea that Bin Laden and his ilk will be satisfied if the West leaves the area is amazingly naive and stupid. Why do you think they want the West out? So they can take control. What ever gave you the idea that once they have control, they'll stop there?

Have any of you geniuses ever considered the fact that these terrorists want POWER? Or the fact that anyone who craves power and is willing to gain power in the manner that they are will never be satisfied with the power they have?


Of course they do.  It's all about control and power and influence.  But without the western powers in the region as the enemy, or trying to keep a lid on things, all those seeking that power and control will turn on each other just as quickly.  Thousands of years of hate and grudges against their neighbors released.  

Arabs don't want the Persians gaining ground in Iraq.  Persians don't want the Arabs to take control over Iraq again.  No-one else in the region likes, or trusts, the Kurds.  You have tribe against tribe, clan against clan, ayatollah against iam, secular interests against fundamentalism, and everywhere greed in regards to control over oil, drugs, and arms sales.  How far will the other groups go, if it looks like one group is gaining ground?


Will the withdraw of the western powers from the Middle East stop terrorism?  No.  Might dampen it a bit.  But at least the cost in blood and treasure trying to keep that part of the world artificially stable will be gone, and much of that hatred in the region would be turned on each other rather than outward.


But the reality is, we need to stay in the region to protect our "national interests" read as: the economy.  For Congress to talk about pulling troops out is short sighted insanity.  Going in was a bad idea.  How they prosecuted the war was mis-handled.  Winning the war meant nothing since we've lost the peace.  There are no "good " ways out of this mess any more, just less bad...... but we can't withdraw.  
A couple British get taken by Iraq, and the price of oil goes up.  Were the United States to pull out of Iraq, there is a good chance the whole region would erupt.... with the result being the collapse of western economies.
Americans don't want to see dead soldiers coming back to the States, but I'm betting they would hate what the results of $6 to $10 a gallon of gas would do to their world even more.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #56 on: April 11, 2007, 02:02:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK


Remember Iran is the country that produced the first suicide bomber who is now one of their national hero's (I forget his name at the moment)



The VC used suicide bombers in Vietnam.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #57 on: April 11, 2007, 02:05:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
100% False.

It would spawn even more terrorists and make the criminal elements even more determined. The harder you fight them the more support they get and the more they grow out of dispare, hate, positive propaganda for their "cause" and lack of goodwill among your own population.


If america were under attack, would you then cave if symbols of your own national pride, churches or whatnot were destroyed? or would you lock and load your winchesters and do whatever you can to give em some payback?



Yep, and another example was the debacle at Abu Gharib (sp?).  That incident alone created hundreds of new insurgents.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #58 on: April 11, 2007, 02:06:36 PM »
Laser's views have been ultimately shown for what they are in this thread - empty enthusiasm.

I don't see the difference between stating that we would be right to nuke an entire Muslim country and stating the Nazis were right to liquidate entire villages due to the actions of partisans. What is the difference?

Genocide is really something we should avoid.
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
War on Terror means unwinnable, eternal war
« Reply #59 on: April 11, 2007, 02:23:32 PM »
there is no war on terror.  There is no religious war.  Just a war for oil, power and wealth between the have and the have nots.  Since my team has all the goods, I want my team to keep it that way too.  Killem all.

Just kidding of course :rolleyes:

NOT :D

No, seriously :aok

Haha:rofl
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns