Author Topic: HTC we really need a buff perk point sink....  (Read 1120 times)

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
HTC we really need a buff perk point sink....
« Reply #30 on: May 29, 2007, 05:26:35 PM »
Right........Bostons would have 2 more guns......Lancs would only have 6 more...so how can we deal with the issue of bombers having more guns controlled and slaved by one player? I know...lets add Otto....oh wait...thats right....you don't want Otto....so what can we do? Lets just remove buff guns.
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
HTC we really need a buff perk point sink....
« Reply #31 on: May 29, 2007, 05:37:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Last thing bombers need is MORE guns all laser-slaved to the same gunner....


** The more I think about it, the more that additional drones won't work.  Not because of the guns so much as the effect on CV's and TT.  CV's too vulnerable now since no one flies CAP and they have no early earning picket destroyers.   Larger flights of buffs carpet bombing TT is just an additional grief.   Then there is the fact towns become that much easier to drop for capture.

Being able to buy a 3rd, 4th, or 5th drone would add to the ability of buff drivers to attack strat factories for strategic side of the war to greater effect, as well as be a buff perk point sink, but the other game play and grief issues make it a bad path to follow.  Heavy bombers without drones are very easy targets for enemy fighters to kill, so I can't see adding a perk cost to drones #1 and #2.  (I'll grant that the drone catch up speed should be limited to max, not the speeds they do attain now, to force pilots to take care of their formations, and I'd love to see a lightly perked German 88mm FlaK36 added to the game as well to provide manned puffy ack).


** Perked ord is just a nerf to the existing bombers.  4,000 lb cookie cutter is the largest we'll see, according to HTC mantra, so no larger bombs to spend perks on.


** I don't like the idea of transferable perks.  Would lead to buff perk farming in EW and MW to spend on LW perk rides by players that are not much good in them.


** That leaves additional perk rides.   A-26B and A-26C Invader, the Mosquito B.Mk XVI, and (maybe) the He-177.  
But even with additional perk rides, the perk sink won't be a very large one.  Only bombers that could be added that would be big perk point sinks would be the B-29 and the He-177 with Henschel Hs 293 or Fritz X munitions..... neither of which we will see.

A rough work of the numbers in the Scores for this month (total kills plus total deaths per plane shown against the total for the entire class) shows bomber use to be approximately:
 Comparative bomber use
B24   20.2%
Lanc   19.2%
IL2    13.0%
B-17   11.7%
B26    9.6%
JU88   8.3%
A20    5.0%
TBM    3.9%
Ki-67    2.1%
Boston 1.6%
SBD    1.4%
Stuka   1.3%
B5N2   0.7%
D3A1   0.7%
Arado   0.5%

This is just working with the numbers available.  I only sampled one month, since without the actual number of spawns, I only have kill and death numbers to work with, so it will be +/- a few tenths anyways.

And by contrast, bombers accounted for 14% of the planes used when comparing kill and death totals across the board.  86% were fighters and attack planes.

Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
You underestimate the Mitchell! Many will fly it because we like it better than the B-26, not because it's better than it :aok

<-- would use the B-25 for a bomber a LOT more than the B-26.


No doubt that there are a number of pilots that will fly it, but I very much doubt "many" will.   As it won a popular vote, and based on it's performance numbers, I still believe many pilots will not fly it past the second or third tour on release.  The players in general seem to put a premium on total bomb carry capacity.   And I'm betting missions like those posted by ghi are inflating (skewing) the B-26 numbers relative to the rest.   4 planes account for approximately 64% of the bombers, and one of them primarily does anti-GV work.  

So I believe the players (in general) will shun the Mitchell.  A 75mm equipped one may draw some interest, but I doubt that it would be very effective vs GVs or towns.  There will be some skins done for the Mitchell, probably more skins than most planes see.  It will see some SEA use and possibly EW/MW use, depending on the version. But overall I expect a resounding "thud" after initial novelty wears off.  My guess is around 5% by it's fourth tour and helped by EW use.

And this is from a player that flew mostly B-17's vs field strats before the MA split, and flies mostly A-20's, IL2's, and Ki-67's in LW now, when driving buffs.  

Even the A-26B and A-26C combo I pushed for would not break into the percentages of the heavies, although it's performance, gun package, and loadout would have helped it's relative use a lot as compared to most, and would have provided an additional perk sink to the Arado.

Offline crockett

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3420
HTC we really need a buff perk point sink....
« Reply #32 on: May 29, 2007, 06:38:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by LTARsqrl
More planes in a formation?  Not till you make it so they can't carpet bomb from 200 feet.  OR, give us the 88 for a defensive weapon.  

Perk the drones?  Good idea.  That might help cure people from flying a formation in and loosing all their drones carpet bombing.  Or doing the "Bomb and Bail" routine.  You don't see to many carpet bombing Ar-234s now do you?  I know there are some buff bunnies that have like a 4 to 1 death to kill ratio just because they fly at tree top level to carpet bomb a GV or two.  They routinely loose all their planes and just reup.  No loss.  What the heck.  BUT if they lost perk pts for every drone they lost, it wouldn't be very long at all before that would end.  :aok

And as for having more buffs or fighters?  As I said once before.  There are 73, soon to be 74 airplanes to chose from and 11 vehicles with only two that are designed for air defense.  

WIRBLWIND - GERMAN 88   :D

LTARsqrl  <>


Why hurt the guys that use bombers correctly just to stop the dweebs?  Why not make the bomb bay door auto close on formation bombers, if the plane is under 1k alt or in a dive? Seems to me something simple like that would fix the issue and not hurt guys that use bombers the way they were meant to be used.
"strafing"

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
HTC we really need a buff perk point sink....
« Reply #33 on: May 30, 2007, 01:50:22 AM »
The thread was about perk sinks. It implies spending some perks.

Bomber perks are by far the easiest to make. Perking drones is a good idea that will hurt no one if the cost is low enough. Even 1-2 perks per drone is sufficient. Worst case scenario - you take off in a single bomber - It worked just fine in AHI for years. Hit a town or a factory which you can't miss and next sortie you get your drones. I bet most bomber pilots will hoard so many perk points they'll never notice drones cost any.

Perking 1000+ lbs is a good idea. It does not penalize the bombers and goes well with HTC's future plane to perk loadout options. Most bombers can carry the same weight in 500 lbs that they can in 1000 lbs. I strongly support perking 1000 lbs mainly for the JABO role, but that's another issue.

Adding a perk bomber will be nice, but not really a perk sink. They will be rarely used, same as the perked fighters. A perk sink needs to work across the board and loadout/drones perks do that.

Remember: Its all free if you land it.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
HTC we really need a buff perk point sink....
« Reply #34 on: May 30, 2007, 07:28:23 AM »
Tedrbr the more of your posts I read the more I have come to respect what you have to say.  

That was one well thought out post up above.

YES please give us a very lightly perked mossie bomber only varient with formations.

YES please A26's, preferably at least a couple of varients, perk them, but hopefully not TOO high. I don't mind spending a few perks now & then but I won't spend 200 perks on a bomber thats going to get shot down. 30 to 50, sure thing, bring it on.

Last I've been saying for years now that AH needs a Perk Point Bank.
Move perks between arena's but at a healthy cost. Like 20% fee for doing so.
Change bomber perks to fighter perks, but pay a 20% changing fee to do so.

Give perks to a squad mate or friend, should be fast, free and easy. After all there should be no charge for a charitable donation right?

They are our perks, we earned them, let us do what we please with them.
But make us pay for the privilege of doing so. :)

Ohhh and last, 5000 perks should get you a free tshirt with the AH logo on it.
You've earned it!