Author Topic: Homeowner defends property without guns (Read 2588 times)

Hortlund · « **Reply #30 on:** July 14, 2007, 04:15:02 AM »

LOL some of you are quite pathetic...

a criminal behaved in a way that I did not expect...the story must be a lie

The police has confirmed the story, thats all you need to know.

moot · « **Reply #31 on:** July 14, 2007, 06:10:15 AM »

The exception makes the rule?

FrodeMk3 · « **Reply #32 on:** July 14, 2007, 06:22:23 AM »

McFarland's most likely right. What kind of host takes off while he still has guests' at his home, just to walk the dog? Staged.

Rolex · « **Reply #33 on:** July 14, 2007, 06:57:17 AM »

Apollo 11 was staged, so could this.

The would-be robber was probably a congressman. I heard some of them moonlight sticking up convenience stores to keep up their skillz.

Sox62 · « **Reply #34 on:** July 14, 2007, 10:39:27 AM »

It was probably someone from McCain's campaign trying to scrounge up some cash.

VWE · « **Reply #35 on:** July 14, 2007, 10:43:11 AM »

Quote

Ehh, do you have the recipee for that?

Take one dirty bottle, fill it with piss, chill and enjoy your schlitz...

Tango · « **Reply #36 on:** July 14, 2007, 11:20:11 AM »

Isn't it even more odd that someone was having a dinner/cookout at midnight? Just makes the story even more unbelieveable.

texasmom · « **Reply #37 on:** July 15, 2007, 09:29:56 AM »

When I saw the subject line I thought ~ what did he use ~ a bat, or a knife?

lazs2 · « **Reply #38 on:** July 15, 2007, 10:09:41 AM »

I think that the important thing to note in the story is that...

There are very strict gun laws in DC that the law abiding must live by..

the psycho who invaded was armed.

The psycho was in complete control of the situation... it amused him to let them live and be unharmed.

If he wasn't in a whimsical mood... he would still control the situation.

he simply let the sheep go that time. Next week... may not have the same outcome... not even with all the same people involved.

He may still drink their wine but... only after the rape and murder is over.

lazs

Angus · « **Reply #39 on:** July 15, 2007, 02:10:05 PM »

And the idiot was armed because it was easy enough for him to get his hands on a gun.

(runs and ducks for cover

)

moot · « **Reply #40 on:** July 15, 2007, 02:21:37 PM »

And it's easy to get your hands on a gun precisely because that guy has no scrupules about doing what he did, with or without a gun.
What would the alternative to the second amendment be, Angus?

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #41 on:** July 15, 2007, 03:16:02 PM »

And Im sure that the "intruder" hood and all when he left just blended in perfectly with the locals in the high end area too

Either this was an inside job orrrr

this is a case of a bunch of people after drinking several short drinks telling a very tall tale

Angus · « **Reply #42 on:** July 15, 2007, 05:58:16 PM »

How about deleting some amendments?

moot · « **Reply #43 on:** July 15, 2007, 07:56:36 PM »

Starting with the Bill of Rights maybe?

lazs2 · « **Reply #44 on:** July 16, 2007, 09:12:35 AM »

It is "easy enough" for any person to get any gun in any country. I could get any handgun I wanted in any country that has banned them.

lazs

Author Topic: Homeowner defends property without guns (Read 2588 times)

VWE