FX1- I am NOT attacking YOU. I am going to use your quotes and refer to "you" in this post, but it is not directed at "you" per se. "You" refers to a general group of people. I respect you as a pilot and don't want you to take this the wrong way.
The top two sections refering to flaps are for you (FX1). The rest is my feelings on a general attitude in the game...
225mph"
At those speeds the f4u4 high speed flaps dont matter.
This is precisely WHERE the flaps matter. They start coming down at 250, 2nd notch at 225. If the high speed flaps don't matter at high speed, where do they matter?
... and after the spit deploys its flaps it just a matter of time.
I do agree here. A spit that drops his flaps vs the F4U is dead unless the F4U driver makes an effort to fly like a dolt.
OK FX1- This is where I diverge from directing this at you. I'm using your quote here because it is such a popular opinion in the game. Don't take it as an attack.
I guess my point is that if it was a fight to the death "no running" i would take the spit.
Herein lies the answer. The spit driver DOES have a chance against the F4U if the F4U slows down and continues to try to out-turn the spit at slow speed. This is just plain stupid, of course. This allows the spit to use the advantages of his plane, while castrating the Hog. It seems folks think that it's ok to insist that the other player abandon the strengths of their personal ride in favor of letting the better turning plane win. Sad, yes, but true.
It's perfectly ok, heck even my DUTY to fly stupid and let you kill me, right? To use the strengths of my plane (speed, for one) and deny you yours (slow speed sustained turning ability) would be what? Strategy? How UNFAIR!! It would only be fair if I reverse that, and GIVE you the advantage. Does a spit need a "gift" to kill a hog?
What the F4U pilot NEEDS to do is extend for some speed and seperation and try again. I'm not talking about out of icon range. 2-3K is plenty. But your "no running, to the death" statement denies that option right?
So you're really saying- "As long as the F4U pilot doesn't use the strengths of his plane or his brain to beat me, I choose the spit."
The general attitude seems to be- "You get one try, maybe two, to kill me while your plane is functioning well. No more. Then, when you lose your speed it's all over. You must drive your plane the way I see fit, and allow me to pick you to death at slow speed with my big gun."
Sadly, this is obviously the predominant opinion of the low and slow crowd.
I wonder why the slower planes so often needed such big guns. Was it because they needed to inflict lethal damage in a fleeting opportunity against a faster plane?
Don't get me wrong- I'm not griping here. I just have to sit back and sigh. I'm saddened by it, not irritated.
Do you people ever compete on a level where both parties can attempt to perform at their best?
Do you allow your billiards opponent to use both hands? Choose his own que? Or do you get to pick. Do you make him stick one hand in his pocket while he shoots with his crooked que, so you can amaze him with your two-handed prowess?
Do you hunt deer during the day? Or at night with a spotlight in a fenced-in enclosure?
Do you play baseball against an "equal" team? Or against children with broomsticks.
Sad, really, that anyone would WANT or EXPECT someone to throw them the fight. Where do you see the "glory" of winning against an opponent who is limited by "your" perceptions of how he should fly?
You should be irritated by the people who DO fly the way you mention, not the other way around.
You can only be as good as your competition.
MtnMan