Neo-Nazism and Re-enactment groups...

[moot]

I got better grades than them and took their girlfriends or just happened to walk their territory... Voltaire's words still trump any sort of vengeance, though.
I can stand nazis because they are well within the realms of humanity.  Far inland

[AKIron]

Others have said it better but I'll still weigh in here. Freedom of speech is the best defense against nazis and other socialists who would relieve us our liberties to establish order as they believe best.

[Excel1]

Originally posted by straffo
I never started the fight myself. I just mentioned the long list their genetic deficiencies and congenital stupidity.

I hope you kicked him in the nut... it's genetics you know

Adolf Hitler's right testicle is hidden in the Royal Albert Hall, London, according to a new book by American author Dan Breun.

The book, entitled The Hitler Testicle Code, bases a fictionalized story around a popular conspiracy theory, dating back to 1932, which suggests the reason Hitler turned to evil was because he was 'only firing on one of his love cylinders'.

The author says he has evidence that proves one of Adolf Hitler's testicles has been hidden by British secret service agents in the Albert Hall for over 60 years.

The origins of the conspiracy can be found in a war time school playground song:

Wartime song,  
(1st Verse) Hitler, he's only got one ball,
Goering has two but they are small,
Himmler had something simmler,
But poor old Goebbels has no balls at all.

(4th Verse) Hitler has only got one ball,
The other is in the Albert Hall.
His mother, the dirty bugger,
Cut it off when he was small.
 
Proof, says Dan Breun, that Hitler was a Unitesti

Using the latest sonar techniques a 3" by 3" crypt has been located underneath the floor of the Albert Hall. This was sealed in 1942 by the British secret service fearing that Nazi loyalists would attempt to find the testicle in an attempt to grow another Hitler, according to Breun.

Conservationists refuse permission to dig down into the vault to find what is inside this mini crypt.

Other evidence in The Hitler Testicle Code
1) Albert Hall, and Adolf Hitler both share the same initials: AH

2) There is no photographic evidence that Hitler had two testicles.

3) hitler when spelled backwards is reltih. When encrypted using a German wartime cryptograph this translates to Albert Nut.

4) The painting Mona Lisa is Adolf Hitler without the mustache.
 

 
 

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by Angus
Jackal had a very nice reply. I looked at my post and realized afterwards that it was a sort of a bait, - not just a question of opinion of where to draw the line, which it was meant to be. Anyway, he swallowed it with hook and sinker. I will get back later, for on this sunday, I am doing harvest.

If you can consider that bait, then I will assure you I will take it most of the time when it includes freedom of speech or loss/giving up of freedom in any form.

As for the-----> BOOM!    I will be sending a bill for the Windex and paper towels shortly.
Be safe on the harvest bro.

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by McFarland
Very well said Jackal, but I don't think it will help Angus understand what we are saying any better. He is stuck with the notion a completely controlling government is a good government, and nobody can be trusted other than himself.

I took some time before replying to this and thought it over. Why? Mostly , I think that it is the first time that you have posted something that I had to give some real thought . Well done.
I can`t totaly agree with this. I think it doesn`t explain the situation, and I am not trying to speak for Angus, but will give it a shot as to how I view it.
I believe Angus is now beginning to see things come about in his country, on a small scale, that we have had to deal with and been in constant contact with for most of our lives. Even with the small percentage of total world immigration (0.01) in Angus`s country he has noticed the input and is frustrated with some of the things it has brought. That is obvious from his own posts. There will be more as time goes by.
I believe Angus is trying to figure out how things  as this should be dealt with in his country and others. The only way that has been known up to this point is to deal with things with the cards that have been dealt to the people.
Hopefully it will be realized that they are and have been playing with a stacked deck. A fresh deck is needed .
We , here in the U.S. , have let our deck be tampered with also. I only hope it is not to late to set things straight and give the power of laws/government back to the people, as it should be.

[McFarland]

Thanks for that clarification Jackal, I hadn't thought of it that way, I looked with an old American point of view.

[Angus]

Freedom of speech means we have to ban....SKUZZY

btw WHO OF YOU WERE IN THE WOMEN'S RIGHT'S THREAD? I seem to recall some other angles of freedom there.

And as for the law, the constitution that gives you rights, is law. Unchanged AFAIK for a long time it sure seems to have some flexibility in interpretion.

[Angus]

Originally posted by Jackal1
I took some time before replying to this and thought it over. Why? Mostly , I think that it is the first time that you have posted something that I had to give some real thought . Well done.
I can`t totaly agree with this. I think it doesn`t explain the situation, and I am not trying to speak for Angus, but will give it a shot as to how I view it.
I believe Angus is now beginning to see things come about in his country, on a small scale, that we have had to deal with and been in constant contact with for most of our lives. Even with the small percentage of total world immigration (0.01) in Angus`s country he has noticed the input and is frustrated with some of the things it has brought. That is obvious from his own posts. There will be more as time goes by.
I believe Angus is trying to figure out how things  as this should be dealt with in his country and others. The only way that has been known up to this point is to deal with things with the cards that have been dealt to the people.
Hopefully it will be realized that they are and have been playing with a stacked deck. A fresh deck is needed .
We , here in the U.S. , have let our deck be tampered with also. I only hope it is not to late to set things straight and give the power of laws/government back to the people, as it should be.

Well thought I have to say.
You forget onething in your analyzis, - I have lived in many countries, and wandered a bit. My focus point is Europe, where Nazism was born, and still has a tendency to swell and give trouble. It is indeed kept at bay by the authorities with various methods, but they are very tricky. I am not sure how it is done here, but I belive it's an issue with their press. Since it normally contains straight lies in the form of propoganda as well as assault and insults on groups of various origins it gives an opening to a lawsuit.
That's the law, (and nobody has relatively more lawsuits than the USA BTW). It works to some extent and that seems to be enough.
They don't rally up here, but they did before WW2. They do indeed rally in Germany nowadays, and it tends to break up into riots. I belive they were not allowed to before, - or perhaps they are just skinhead rallies shouting slogans, - the salutes and uniforms were at least banned for a long time in Germany.
All funny to compare human rights in one country as well as another. And we choose to disagree.

[Grayeagle]

If the Neo-Nazi's want to re-enact something ..

..I suggest the Nuremburg Trials.

Or howbout the Fall of Berlin.

-just a thought-

-Frank aka GE

[Angus]

Hehe.
BTW at the 60 years "anniversary" of the firebombing of Dresden, some 3000 of them were marching through the city in a protest to this British and American attrocity.
I will be looking at that city in some 10 days.

[Vudak]

Originally posted by Angus
Freedom of speech means we have to ban....SKUZZY

You know, you might be free to say the n-word around a black man, but do it in his home, and expect to be thrown out.

[Angus]

But I can shout it out in a multi-cultural public.
Dare I say that the "n"'s should all be re-enslaved since they are underdeveloped and the constitution once allowed that, - shouting high on scaffolds on times square, or do you think the police might arrest me?

[Vudak]

Originally posted by Angus
But I can shout it out in a multi-cultural public.
Dare I say that the "n"'s should all be re-enslaved since they are underdeveloped and the constitution once allowed that, - shouting high on scaffolds on times square, or do you think the police might arrest me?

Angus, no offense, but your posts are betraying a destinct lack of familiarity with America It really can't be summed up by sound bites from your favorite news program.

You will find people screaming all sorts of things in Times Square.  The nutjobs are one of the more interesting parts about a trip to the city

Also, your claim that "the Constitution once allowed that" is completely false.  

---

You know, my father used to tell me, "If you're right, you can argue and defend yourself, and you'll come out right."  

I'm still waiting to hear your arguments as to why the basic points so many of us have said in this thread are wrong.

Because so far, every one of your arguments has come down to, "This type of speech should be banned because I personally don't like it."  Let me fill you in - We get that.  Now please come up with something more substantial, because your personal preferences, though noble enough, aren't going to cut it.

Pretend I'm the Supreme Court judge.  Convince me certain people should not be entitled to their Constitutional rights.

[Angus]

So, times square was a wrong choice?
Like Speaker's corner in London?

As for the constitution, has it been altered? If so, then my ignorance. But out of memory there was slavery after the constitution.

[Vudak]

I believe (correct me if I got you wrong) that you inferred that the Constitution "allowed" slavery.

It never did.  Later on, amendments were added that specifically prohibited slavery, but never was there an amendment condoning it.