Author Topic: did anyone catch fred thompson on leno last night? (Read 1733 times)

GtoRA2 · « **Reply #15 on:** September 06, 2007, 01:10:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dago
No way should anyone vote for Guilliani.

It might be worth remembering that when he was mayor of New York, he advocated licensing for gun owners, avidly supported federal gun control measures such as the Brady Law and the "assault weapon" ban, blamed lax gun laws in other states for violent crime in New York City, and participated in litigation that aimed to impose national restrictions on the gun industry.

Guilliani is no friend of the honest law abing gun owner.

BTW, Lazs, is Kalifornia really getting ready to ban lead bullets?

I had not heard that but it wouldn't suprise me.

JB88 · « **Reply #16 on:** September 06, 2007, 01:28:32 PM »

oh look...it's the ghost of reagan.

woooooooOoooo (clank clank) WoooOOOOooooo (clank clank)

DYNAMITE · « **Reply #17 on:** September 06, 2007, 01:39:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
oh look...it's the ghost of reagan.

woooooooOoooo (clank clank) WoooOOOOooooo (clank clank)

IMHO Fred Thompson is the only real contender for the GOP in a national election. I wish him well. If he gets the GOP ticket I won't feel so bad.

ROC · « **Reply #18 on:** September 06, 2007, 01:49:29 PM »

Already signed up to work on Thompsons campaign

lazs2 · « **Reply #19 on:** September 06, 2007, 02:05:42 PM »

I hope I am wrong on this and that I will get to vote for him against whoever is the democrat running.

I do not like rudy's stance on gun control... fred's is 100 times better but...

The worst republican in the race is 100 times better than the best democrat so far as firearms rights go.

lazs

lazs2 · « **Reply #20 on:** September 06, 2007, 02:12:35 PM »

Oh... my other take on fred is that... of all the republican candidates...

He would be the one that democrats would be eager to have an excuse to vote for.... There is probly a huge segment of the democrat voter block who would love any excuse to not vote for hillary.

I mean.... hell... old fred is downhome and... an actor!

lazs

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #21 on:** September 06, 2007, 02:14:40 PM »

Best thing that came out last night is the Thompson bumper sticker:

Thompson '08: because Giuliani is too hard to spell

Eagler · « **Reply #22 on:** September 06, 2007, 03:41:39 PM »

my vote is for the pair of republicans who win the nomination .. whoever they turn out to be

to even think otherwise is ridiculous

JB88 · « **Reply #23 on:** September 06, 2007, 04:00:40 PM »

"only a sith deals in absolutes anakin." - obe wan kenobi

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #24 on:** September 06, 2007, 04:39:40 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
I hope I am wrong on this and that I will get to vote for him against whoever is the democrat running.

I do not like rudy's stance on gun control... fred's is 100 times better but...

The worst republican in the race is 100 times better than the best democrat so far as firearms rights go.

lazs

I side with you when it comes to individual gun ownership.
But being here in Jersey Im quite familiour with Rudy as we get force fed all the New York crap. Actually I get all the crap from both NYC and Philly. Sometimes I feel like Im stuck in between a "Dumb and Dumber" movie So I am somewhat qualified to give an opinion.

Rudy did great things in NYC no doubt. He took it from what can best be discribed as a cesspool and cleaned it up to where if I liked NYC (which I dont) I might actually go there.
But when it comes to Rudy and guns. Or more specifically Gun ownership.
Rudy is at least as bad as even a mid (neither best nor worst) Democrat.

He'll try to take your guns man.

I only caught the last couple of minutes of the debate last night.And the interview he gave on class clown "A" Shawn Hannity and his equally moronic co host Colms .So I cant comment on the entire thing.

But it seems Rudy is going ot run on what he did in NYC, Many years ago.

While I liked him when it first became apparent he was going ot run. I have since soured on him.

What he did in NYC worked great in NYC.
But NYC is NYC.
NYC is not the nation.
It wont work nation wide

Mr No Name · « **Reply #25 on:** September 06, 2007, 04:54:20 PM »

Thompson / Tancredo

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #26 on:** September 06, 2007, 04:58:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
Oh... my other take on fred is that... of all the republican candidates...

He would be the one that democrats would be eager to have an excuse to vote for.... There is probly a huge segment of the democrat voter block who would love any excuse to not vote for hillary.

I mean.... hell... old fred is downhome and... an actor!

lazs

That statement may very well be true.

I read an article recently that stated that ALOT of democrats and more importantly democratic candidates up for election/re election in their respective offices secretly dont like Hillary but are afraid to say so publically because they fear "Clinton retribution".

They are afraid she is so polarizing a candidate that she will bring people out to the polls who normally wouldnt vote (ala Bush 04 election)
Just to vote against her and the party. Thus hurting their chances.

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #27 on:** September 06, 2007, 05:28:02 PM »

Fred Thompson/Duncan Hunter or Fred Thompson/Newt Gingrich

JB88 · « **Reply #28 on:** September 06, 2007, 05:30:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
Fred Thompson/Duncan Hunter or Fred Thompson/Newt Gingrich

i'm all for hunter thompson!

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #29 on:** September 06, 2007, 05:32:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
i'm all for hunter thompson!

He's just a little bit DEAD. I tried to read his stuff, I just got annoyed, and got a headache. The guy was a nutcake.