Author Topic: p39 (Read 1735 times)

Fariz · « **on:** September 12, 2007, 11:16:47 PM »

P-39 finally, pls. It was an ace ride for VVS. Of the main fighter aircrafts of the WW2 it is probably the last, which has not been modeled yet, not a single version. Please, close this gap.

Latrobe · « **Reply #1 on:** September 13, 2007, 07:53:39 AM »

I voted for it.

Nimrod45 · « **Reply #2 on:** September 13, 2007, 08:00:35 AM »

Me to, bring on the P-39. It was there from the start to finish.

oboe · « **Reply #3 on:** September 13, 2007, 09:09:13 AM »

Yes, please. D and Q, if possible...

Kweassa · « **Reply #4 on:** September 13, 2007, 09:13:33 AM »

I voted for it as well.

If three models are allowed, I'd ask the D, N, Q.

If only two, then the N and Q.

Bronk · « **Reply #5 on:** September 13, 2007, 03:36:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Kweassa

If three models are allowed, I'd ask the D, N, Q.

If only two, then the N and Q.

Agreed.

Bronk

E25280 · « **Reply #6 on:** September 13, 2007, 06:46:40 PM »

Dare I say it??

Two weeks.[/size]

VansCrew1 · « **Reply #7 on:** September 13, 2007, 07:42:34 PM »

P39 yes.The B25 has only been out for a short while but not alot of people are flying it P39 would be better more fun.More of difficlut you can say.With only 30 37mm canon rounds and 4 .50cals it's great.The 50 cals alone can kill a fighter.People that like to hold their fire untill the right shot would love this fighter.Get up close and pop them w/ the canon or reach out and touch them 600 out.And with bombs It would be a good ground pounder.Myself and others would love to see the P39 in the game.Would be more fun then the B25 i think.

humble · « **Reply #8 on:** September 14, 2007, 08:40:27 AM »

You'd have to have the D since its the most needed scenario wise...the Q-25 would probably be the definative "late model". I know that there was one variant of the Q or N that had the 1400+ hp allision in it that did 398+

humble · « **Reply #9 on:** September 14, 2007, 09:14:25 AM »

The P-39 could be very interesting if we got some of the late models. Here is a quote from WW in an earlier thread on engines for the P-39. Most common websites show the same "stock" numbers for the P-39...however the M, N & Q all had variations with the Allison V1710-83 & V1710-85 engines...which were rated at 1420 hp and gave the P-39s so equipped better climb and speed numbers then the la-5....

I've copied WW's 411 as well as the russian website I found back then....

Installed in the P-39M, P-39N and P-39Q, both the V1710-83 and V1710-85 were rated at 1,420 hp at 3,000 rpm @ 57" MAP.

It gets better... The V1710-63 installed in the P-39K and P-39L was rated at 1,590 hp at 3,000 rpm @ 61" MAP.

Now, the V1710-93 installed in the P-63A was rated at 1,820 hp at 3,000 rpm @ 75" MAP with water injection.

See Dean's, America's Hundred Thousand.

Oh, and some P-63s saw limited combat against the Luftwaffe as part of a combat evaluation. Later, some Soviet P-63s saw combat briefly against the Japanese in the last week of the war.

My regards,

Widewing

Russian P-39

VansCrew1 · « **Reply #10 on:** September 14, 2007, 06:32:34 PM »

P39 would of been way better then the B25.

Spikes · « **Reply #11 on:** September 14, 2007, 07:37:21 PM »

Proud voter of the P39.

Redlegs · « **Reply #12 on:** September 14, 2007, 08:31:49 PM »

does that answer the question?

Easyscor · « **Reply #13 on:** September 15, 2007, 01:48:07 AM »

There's many planes I want but this is the most needed IMO.

trigger2 · « **Reply #14 on:** September 15, 2007, 03:07:02 AM »

you GOTTA love the p39Q, one of the best ones out there
i'm all for it