Hi All,
I am very new at the game (5 weeks) but, must say I am somewhat addicted. Maybe this is a stupid question from a noob and I should shut my pie-hole but, are there large differences in the types of players that make up each team?
I started out with the bishops and found some really great players and learned a lot from them. However, the bulk of the time it just seemed more like a free for all without much tactics or cooperative game play. I have been playing the Janes and other MS combat games for years but, found the multi-player here really makes the game great when people were working together. But, like I said that was few and far between.
I did not even realize you could change sides but, as example after trying to get troops in a Goon and being shot down multiple times I was getting turned off. Even the simplest calls for mutual help or request for a basic report on other fighter status over the town from the myriad of other bishop players there resulted in no more than a big “F” off or other wise comments.
This was just one example that to me, showed a lack of mutual cooperation that seemed par for the course most of the time I was in the game.
I was looking through the help section and came across switching countries. Anyway, I switched to the rooks and it seemed like a different world within 5 minutes. Plenty of mutual cooperation, talk on the radio and way more of a team/ esprit de corps structure.
Is this indicative of the make up of the teams, or was I just playing at off hours (6-9pm est) for the bishops?
I don’t mean to offend anyone (and my apologies upfront if I do) or ruffle feathers, but like I said as a noob my impression is night and day between the sides.
Thanks in advance.