Author Topic: General Climate Discussion  (Read 93305 times)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #1995 on: August 28, 2008, 07:55:49 AM »
yep.. it was like the smog devices of the 70's that were mandated by government.   we were not ready for them.   the cars were big V8's with carbs and no computers.   the smog devices were trash and made the cars run so badly that they got 50% less mileage and were always out of tune producing even more smog.   

When computers became small and powerful enough and fuel injection and timing could be controled by computer.. the cars instantly got better mileage and less smog.   these things were going to happen with or without the laws and hysteria..  the laws and hysteria just made things worse for a decade or so.

lazs


Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #1996 on: August 28, 2008, 09:14:04 AM »
or what the world has done with biofuels this year... we planted so much grape seed oil crops that there isnt enough grain (in the right places) anymore....
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #1997 on: August 28, 2008, 12:13:04 PM »
Bear in mind,overlag, that the EU has been substitizing land OUT OF USAGE almost to this day, up to an amount of almost 10% at times. This could all have been used for fuel.
Still waiting for the big teaser's answer though.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline bongaroo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1822
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #1998 on: August 28, 2008, 02:21:51 PM »
Did anyone notice that the same bunch that flat out refuse that co2 operates as a greenhouse gas also blame co2 from volcanoes for GW?
And by the way Whiskey, with the ice as an open system (so that co2 quantity can be debated) and a coffin as a closed system (so that it can possibly be proved that pollution is healthy), I'll give you a comparison.
It's about another "debunked hype", bird flu. Here comes a lesson.
"Scientists" (ahem) have apparently been claiming that the bird flu is related to the evil spanish disease which killed millions in 1918.
So, they dug for evidence in corpses that were buried in Spitzbergen. They did not manage to extract any useable matter so it was a failiure.
However, they found a useable corpse buried in ice, in Alaska, and presto, they were right, - more or less.
With the truth founded, they managed to trace down some survivors of the disease and insulate their antibodies which were then tested on active bird flu.
It worked very well, so a cure/vaccine is now in process.
Lessons to be learned:
1. Bird flu on the go would have been a global disaster, so precautions were right. (Asia)
2. Research lead to a result.
3. Denialists were wrong.
4 Ice is a much better system to store things from the past than a coffin  :devil

Then comes the PS, question for you all:
Since the GW issue is related with CO2, there is an effort to reduce emissions. Now tell me exactly, what's good about it?


Reminds me of that "scientist" who kept saying cigarettes don't cause cancer as he took big tobacco money to line his pockets.

Wait a sec, isn't that same "scientist" now arguing that GW is a farce while big oil money lines his pockets?

hmmmmmmmmm
Callsign: Bongaroo
Formerly: 420ace


Offline Jackal1

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9092
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #1999 on: August 28, 2008, 04:46:46 PM »
Hairspray is killing us all.  :devil

Still they cling to the hull.
Democracy is two wolves deciding on what to eat. Freedom is a well armed sheep protesting the vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2000 on: August 29, 2008, 03:23:18 AM »
Reminds me of that "scientist" who kept saying cigarettes don't cause cancer as he took big tobacco money to line his pockets.

Wait a sec, isn't that same "scientist" now arguing that GW is a farce while big oil money lines his pockets?

hmmmmmmmmm

Ah, yes, indeed.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2001 on: August 29, 2008, 03:56:07 AM »
"Reminds me of that "scientist" who kept saying cigarettes don't cause cancer as he took big tobacco money to line his pockets.

Wait a sec, isn't that same "scientist" now arguing that GW is a farce while big oil money lines his pockets?"

 Oh jeez next you'll be saying our government lies to us. Cigarettes are good for us. Polution is not a problem. Crack? What Crack?(DC Mayor). I said Texas, not Taxes! (John Connelly or LBJ on bribery investigation) I use a wide stance when in the toilet(Larry Craig). What are you going to believe? What I'm telling you or your lying eyes?
« Last Edit: August 29, 2008, 04:03:37 AM by alskahawk »

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2002 on: August 29, 2008, 04:22:16 AM »
Reminds me of that "scientist" who kept saying cigarettes don't cause cancer as he took big tobacco money to line his pockets.

Wait a sec, isn't that same "scientist" now arguing that GW is a farce while big oil money lines his pockets?

hmmmmmmmmm

this could be an example of the argumentum ad hominem or personal attack fallacy; that is, attempting to disprove X, not by addressing validity of X but by attacking the person who asserted X.

After all Exxon has been known to tell the truth from time to time
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2003 on: August 29, 2008, 07:01:48 AM »
Always tickles though when big oil hires people to deny GW while talking their stocks up because of new opportunities in recent ice-free zones.
BTW, the arctic sea ice has now reached the 2nd smallest place since measurments started, and still has some 3 weeks to go. If it is not a record it is a runner up.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2004 on: August 29, 2008, 08:37:44 AM »
 Got to visit Mendenhall glacier in July. Sad. It's receding and quickly.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2005 on: August 29, 2008, 09:01:07 AM »
So are ours. All of them.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2006 on: August 29, 2008, 09:32:02 AM »
yep.. it's the end of the world...  time for you guys to rend your garments and pull your hair and offer sacrifices at the altar of the high priest algore.

I am glad that you at least believe that a large portion of the scientific community can lie to us to further a personal agenda tho... that is progress.

The only thing that can save us is to go to a one world government and back to the dark ages...  never mind that it is getting cooler... if it gets cool then it will be "record" cooling... caused by man.  only a few scientists and algor and a one world government can save us..   Only when the great satan America has been punished will this plauge be ended.

lazs

Offline Baitman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 678
      • Strike Manufacturing Inc.
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2007 on: August 29, 2008, 10:56:51 AM »
Back in the 1800's and early 1900's as a people we burned LOTS of coal. The emissions from coal are a lot worse then nat gas or gasoline. Why are things different now?
"Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition"
You can be one but NOT both...

Fully Fledged Practising Atheist Bishop

Offline Nwbie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2022
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2008 on: August 29, 2008, 11:20:29 AM »
Back in the 1800's and early 1900's as a people we burned LOTS of coal. The emissions from coal are a lot worse then nat gas or gasoline. Why are things different now?

it's quantity - not quality
« Last Edit: August 29, 2008, 12:44:43 PM by Nwbie »
Skuzzy-- "Facts are slowly becoming irrelevant in favor of the nutjob."

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: General Climate Discussion
« Reply #2009 on: August 29, 2008, 11:44:44 AM »
Actually Lazs, it's not the end of the world. It's simply like while some people try to fight trouble, other stick their head in the sand as long as they can.
Regarding my question before, the benefit of the co2 related discussion would be the wide-awake search for alternative energy sources as well as means to save energy.
This will give us more time before running out of oil.
It will not happen in my life, but still I care....
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)