B29!!!!

[Gowan]

Umm.... since its been a week since someone has asked for this....


can we have it? (i want nookz!)

[Masherbrum]

[Gowan]

yay we have a winner!!!

btw i put this up so i could ask a question, where is the link so i can put it up on a post without quoting someone

[Wes14]

Don't worry here is a image of Skuzzy and Hitech working on the N00k for AH.

[Masherbrum]

Originally posted by Gowan
yay we have a winner!!!

btw i put this up so i could ask a question, where is the link so i can put it up on a post without quoting someone

Nevah!!!!

[Gowan]

Originally posted by Masherbrum
Nevah!!!!

>_<

[Rich46yo]

We'll never see the 29 I believe. Nor will dedicated bomber sticks, like Rodney Dangerfield, ever get true respect.

                        I love the AH level bombers dont get me wrong. And I think AH did a great job modeling them. But we only have what? 7 of them and 1 perk bomber?? Of these the JU-88, the Boston, the B-25c, and the 234 would qualify as "Queens"? Even tho the 234 and JU are to good to be a Queen. The Boston is a true Queen, actually its closer to a 'hoe. Ive never once seen one in the air. The 25c is a Queen no doubt. Who in their right mind would take those when they could have 26s?

                    We deserve a 2nd perk bomber. Tho it would be hard to tear myself from those incredible KI-67s right now.

[Major Biggles]

the bostons are far better than the ki67.

faster and a much better climbrate, with a much bigger payload. bostons rock, but no-one uses them.

[raider73]

nukes would cause a flaw in AH2 u could drop a nukle near a base and destroy everything whats point
 there isnt one NO NUKES for AH2

[Bronk]

Originally posted by Rich46yo
We'll never see the 29 I believe. Nor will dedicated bomber sticks, like Rodney Dangerfield, ever get true respect.

Please quote where anyone from HTC has said no to the B-29.

                        I love the AH level bombers dont get me wrong. And I think AH did a great job modeling them. But we only have what? 7 of them and 1 perk bomber?? Of these the JU-88, the Boston, the B-25c, and the 234 would qualify as "Queens"? Even tho the 234 and JU are to good to be a Queen. The Boston is a true Queen, actually its closer to a 'hoe. Ive never once seen one in the air. The 25c is a Queen no doubt. Who in their right mind would take those when they could have 26s?

                    We deserve a 2nd perk bomber. Tho it would be hard to tear myself from those incredible KI-67s right now.

Rich if you get the chance ask a squad to fly in an FSO with them. This game is much more than the MAs.

[Latrobe]

Originally posted by Wes14

Don't worry here is a image of Skuzzy and Hitech working on the N00k for AH.

[Rich46yo]

Originally posted by Bronk
Rich if you get the chance ask a squad to fly in an FSO with them. This game is much more than the MAs.

                     I was in a squad. I just am in a stage where I prefer doing my own thing right now. Ive been asked to join quite a few squads. This game is full of reall good people in a lot of real good squads.

                  My general impression is were never going to see the 29. I hope Im wrong cause it would be a great addition to the game.

                 The Boston?? The only real thing that turns me off about it is its lack of defensive guns. One .303 turret just aint going to do it for me. The KI-67 is far better defended, almost as fast, and carries almost the same bombload. The Boston was doomed from the git-go cause this is a game where guys like guns. IMOHO. But...maybe Ive been missing somthing with the Bostons.

            Perked 29s would be a great addition to an already 1st class bomber lineup.

[Spikes]

Originally posted by Major Biggles
but no-one uses them.

I use them.

[raider73]

Vanscrew spawn camping as i fly over with B29

He'll never get out in time Muhahaha

[raider73]

VANSCREW SPAWN CAMPING AND ME OVER HEAD HIGH ALT IN B29 CLEARING HIM OUT







TO LATE VANS no more spawn camping for u