Originally posted by Toad
No, I still don't think you know what this case is about. I think you haven't even read the question to be answered the way the Supreme Court wrote it.
The brief is divided into three main components, arguing:
1) The sophisticated collective rights view of the 2A (exclusively military context)...approx. 24 pages
What I have been saying and the longest argument.
2) Jurisdictional issues - the 2A applies only to states (and thus not DC)...approx. 5 pages
I was saying this as well
3) Reasonable restrictions don't violate 2A...approx. 18 pages
1st 2 out of 3 arguments
I think you have proved yourself unenlightened
You should study a little more so you can fully acheive an understanding of what this is about. Tunnel vision does make it eaisier for you I understand....but geez the guy still rowing as he goes over the waterfall.