Originally posted by Toad
Sorry, I don't think you've understood the situation even now.
The brief does not address the question as the Supreme Court framed it.
Focus on that. The SC framed the question to be answered by both sides. The DC brief DOES NOT address the question the SC asked.
Got it yet?
Again, you need to search out and READ the question the SC is asking in this case.
Hope that begins to enlighten you.
What he said!!!!
This issue, as I understand it, is a Judge ruled that a disassemble firearm, as the statute/law required, is NOT a firearm. That due to this statute/law people in that locations were having their 2nd Amendment INFRINGED.
The SC is taking up the appeal made by the D.C. Government to keep this statue/law in place.
Now it is POSSIBLE that the militia issue MIGHT come into play during the SC session due in about June of 2008.
Then again it may not.
So?
All this militia stuff your crowing about may NOT be a factor.
I also point out that MANY people agree with the 2nd Amendment is an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT.
If the SC rules otherwise that COULD result in a disaster for this country.