Originally posted by Maverick Toad, a troll is not something to be admired, pitied maybe, contemptible certainly, but definitely not admired.
Originally posted by john9001 Bingolong=arlo?their posts seem so similar. When someone does not agree with them, they use a personal attack.
Originally posted by Bingolong speaking of trolls, where's your bridge?
Originally posted by Bingolong I bet I've read alot more than you have on this case Good Day sir,
The Justices chose to write out for themselves the constitutional question they will undertake to answer in Heller. Both sides had urged the Court to hear the city’s case, but they had disagreed over how to frame the Second Amendment issue.Here is the way the Court phrased the granted issue:“Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code secs. 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02 — violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?”
Originally posted by Bingolong No I wouldnt have stole the Africans from their homeland in the 1st place.
“Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code secs. 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02 — violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?”
Originally posted by midnight Target That seems to be the implication. You probably wouldn't have any trouble passing laws limiting books to people who did not own land or who weren't white males... if this were still the 18th century.
Originally posted by Arlo Anything more abrasive than a sponge seems to skin you raw. You're surrounded by Arlos. Good luck with that.