Author Topic: Neo-Nazism and Re-enactment groups... (Read 3160 times)

Angus · « **Reply #135 on:** September 04, 2007, 05:01:01 PM »

Is the constitution older than the end of slavery? Constitution = 1787.
Amendments ending slavery some 90 years later along with something (Wiki) that "which extended federal legal protections to citizens regardless of race".

So, it was not forbidden. Had to be forbidden by an amendment.
Opening up a slot for the freedom of a group of people while cutting in on the freedom of another group that no longer could have slaves.

Vudak · « **Reply #136 on:** September 04, 2007, 05:17:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Angus
Is the constitution older than the end of slavery? Constitution = 1787.
Amendments ending slavery some 90 years later along with something (Wiki) that "which extended federal legal protections to citizens regardless of race".

So, it was not forbidden. Had to be forbidden by an amendment.
Opening up a slot for the freedom of a group of people while cutting in on the freedom of another group that no longer could have slaves.

This doesn't reflect well on my country's history, but black's weren't seen as people before those amendments were made.

The Constitution deals with people, and it strives to make sure all have the same rights.

Anyway, Angus, this is really another topic for another thread. Would you care to finally answer everyone who's been asking you for a good argument for why certain people should have less rights than others? One that doesn't boil down to, "They shouldn't be able to say something that Angus doesn't like?"

Jackal1 · « **Reply #137 on:** September 04, 2007, 06:04:18 PM »

Wrong turn at Tulsa.

Angus · « **Reply #138 on:** September 05, 2007, 03:14:18 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Vudak
This doesn't reflect well on my country's history, but black's weren't seen as people before those amendments were made.

The Constitution deals with people, and it strives to make sure all have the same rights.

Anyway, Angus, this is really another topic for another thread. Would you care to finally answer everyone who's been asking you for a good argument for why certain people should have less rights than others? One that doesn't boil down to, "They shouldn't be able to say something that Angus doesn't like?"

Well, in short I see nazis as people who regard it as their right to bully special target groups. So it's either to cut the bully's rights (which basically through possible lawsuits IS so) or stay aside and therefore cut the other group's rights. I need some terms in english to describe this, I'll try to find them (bully isn's quite the word but close).
That is my answer.

Angus · « **Reply #139 on:** September 05, 2007, 03:29:05 AM »

"This doesn't reflect well on my country's history, but black's weren't seen as people before those amendments were made."

That sorts it then. Just stop looking at nazis as humans

64kills · « **Reply #140 on:** January 14, 2008, 04:31:23 PM »

I never knew peopls re-enacted WW2 things i speak quite a bit of German.

Skuzzy · « **Reply #141 on:** January 14, 2008, 04:33:33 PM »

See Rule #13