Author Topic: New HQ.  (Read 2385 times)

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
New HQ.
« on: January 27, 2008, 09:50:24 PM »
wouldnt it be nice to have some sort of new HQ strat, instead of 1 main building that takes 39000lbs to kill? something like the current city tile, size, with many larger buildings that needs to be carpet bombed... and bring back the 4 steps to HQ being down?
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Xasthur

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2728
New HQ.
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2008, 09:58:01 PM »
I miss HQ raids. There hasn't been one 'off-peak' since I can remember.

Closest I got was one dork in 17s who lost the vertical stabiliser on his lead and let his drones roll all the way done to 5k with him.

Anything to revive this side of the game for the off-peak guys would be most welcome with me.
Raw Prawns
Australia

"Beaufighter Operator Support Services"

Offline KTM520guy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 593
New HQ.
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2008, 11:37:56 PM »
We have outgrown our current HQ. Time for a new one. In a better neighborhood, with a nicer decor. A nice yard would be good also.
Everything King Midas touches turns to gold. Everything Chuck Norris touches turns up dead.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
New HQ.
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2008, 12:01:41 AM »
Strat just isn't going to work in the MA.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4032
New HQ.
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2008, 12:07:54 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by KTM520guy
We have outgrown our current HQ. Time for a new one. In a better neighborhood, with a nicer decor. A nice yard would be good also.

How's this?
:p
Former C.O. 91st Bombardment Group (Heavy)
"The Ragged Irregulars"

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
Re: New HQ.
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2008, 12:13:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Overlag
wouldnt it be nice to have some sort of new HQ strat, instead of 1 main building that takes 39000lbs to kill? something like the current city tile, size, with many larger buildings that needs to be carpet bombed... and bring back the 4 steps to HQ being down?


My vote says Yes.

Offline SD67

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3218
New HQ.
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2008, 01:11:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by moot
Strat just isn't going to work in the MA.

It's sad, but we're seeing a greater move away from the strat element in favour of the new air quake order.
The days of groups working as cohesive units carrying out orchestrated attacks and captures sometimes attacking one location to support a capture of another or working on simultaneous captures of strategically important bases are almost a long distant memory.
Too many folks are more interested in individual kills rather than the complete victory.:(
9GIAP VVS RKKA
You're under arrest for violation of the Government knows best act!
Fabricati diem, punc
Absinthe makes the Tart grow fonder

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4207
New HQ.
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2008, 02:42:07 AM »
I'd like to see at town like in round 2 of the AVA event goging on now. It was flipping huge and made a fun target.

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
New HQ.
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2008, 03:21:31 AM »
someone took nit's HQ down last week - first time ive seen it happen in 5 tours :eek:
its really disconcerting having no dar, hadnt realised how much I use it.
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
New HQ.
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2008, 03:33:15 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SD67
It's sad, but we're seeing a greater move away from the strat element in favour of the new air quake order.
The days of groups working as cohesive units carrying out orchestrated attacks and captures sometimes attacking one location to support a capture of another or working on simultaneous captures of strategically important bases are almost a long distant memory.
Too many folks are more interested in individual kills rather than the complete victory.:(

IMO HTC has understood this for a while now.  This is why CT has to happen, asap.
Without furballers, toolsheders are just blowing up inanimate objects under empty skies.  No need to play online to play versus inanimate objects, unless you want to do it coop.  
Toolsheders will get everything they are looking for in CT missions.  There'll be AI and humans mixed together, so that you can do all the team play you want.  I expected AI to just be boring, but with human players hiding somewhere in those escort fighters and bomber gunners, it will be akin to having to looking out for those WWII aces standing above the rest of the average pilot crowd.  

Furballers are a little less dependent on the toolsheders.  They could probably do without them altogether.  Just give them a some empty air and a bunch of other players to shoot down, and the rest is just windowdressing.
They could definitely do without toolsheders who just close FHs for no good reason, and even the base capture scheme is a bother sometimes, because it kills a furball that could have gone on.  All for a few pixels called bases to change color and icon. Pretty trite.
Historical gameplay and all out, non stop furballing just can't happen at the same time in one arena.  That's just not realistic.

All in all, both CT and the MA will complement each other very well, most likely having furballers and toolshedders and anyone in between those two extremes, or any others, interested in both of those two arenas.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15669
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
New HQ.
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2008, 03:37:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by RTHolmes
someone took nit's HQ down last week - first time ive seen it happen in 5 tours :eek:
its really disconcerting having no dar, hadnt realised how much I use it.


We did it against Bish about a month ago twice.

Same situation Nits were in yesterday, upped off the 169 base (i think) NOE lanc run with 5 of us.   Then went about taking the port south of it.  Stole their cv and parked it right next to it.   Upped from the port/airfield and smashed it again  :D

This is why it is essential to defend the frickin fields leading up to the HQ to prevent it from happening.  


Bruv
~S~
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
New HQ.
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2008, 04:44:27 AM »
Landgrabbers make me giggle :D
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
New HQ.
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2008, 06:56:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by moot
Strat just isn't going to work in the MA.


you come to that conclusion because?
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
New HQ.
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2008, 07:07:28 AM »
By principle and empirical evidence.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
New HQ.
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2008, 07:30:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by moot
By principle and empirical evidence.


so when you bomb the AAA factory you believe it doesnt do anything? I guess the bases with 2hour rebuild time on ack will disagree...
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37