Author Topic: simon & garfunkel  (Read 1048 times)

Offline texasmom

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6078
simon & garfunkel
« on: February 26, 2008, 09:30:57 PM »
You know what I don't like about them? They seem like they're whispering everything... like they don't mean what they're singing. There's no gusto. Some of their songs are awesome... if someone else were singing them...
<S> Easy8
<S> Mac

Offline sluggish

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2474
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2008, 09:35:44 PM »
No.  You are wrong.  You are wrong on so many levels you should open the door to let some of the wrong out.

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #2 on: February 26, 2008, 09:38:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by sluggish
No.  You are wrong.  You are wrong on so many levels you should open the door to let some of the wrong out.



Ditto.


The Boxer was whispered?

Offline texasmom

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6078
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2008, 09:41:56 PM »
Even when they're "loud" they're still whispering.
Not the kind of whisper like a secret... the kind of whisper like you're not meaning something.
<S> Easy8
<S> Mac

Offline sluggish

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2474
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2008, 09:44:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Donzo
Ditto.


The Boxer was whispered?

Trudat, or even "Bridge Over Troubled Water".  Plus, can you imagine "The Sound of Silence" sung with "gusto"?

I've got a feeling that Paul Simon knew exactly what he was doing...

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2008, 09:50:50 PM »
I will say that a lot of the songs that Art was the lead vocal on did sound "quiet"...but good none the less :)

Offline texasmom

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6078
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2008, 09:52:57 PM »
Yeah, maybe they intended to sound like they didn't mean it.

Not gusto meaning "loud..."
How come I can't say that right?

Yes, bridge over troubled water & sounds of silence ~ both I can imagine sung with gusto... not "loud..." just with passion I guess is what I'm trying to say.

They sound like they don't mean it.
<S> Easy8
<S> Mac

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2008, 09:57:34 PM »
Maybe they were just too stoned in the studio at the time.
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline sluggish

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2474
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2008, 09:57:43 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by texasmom
Yeah, maybe they intended to sound like they didn't mean it.

Not gusto meaning "loud..."
How come I can't say that right?


There's a lot of melancholy in their songs.  This shouldn't be misconstrued as a lack of earnestness.  This is a a facet of music making that is lost on a lot of today's artists.  Toby Kieth singing "The Sound of Silence" would be a slow hilarious train-wreck.

Offline texasmom

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6078
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2008, 10:00:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by sluggish
There's a lot of melancholy in their songs.  This shouldn't be misconstrued as a lack of earnestness.  This is a a facet of music making that is lost on a lot of today's artists.  Toby Kieth singing "The Sound of Silence" would be a slow hilarious train-wreck.


It's not a lack of earnestness... It's a lack of emotion at all. Like they're just checking a block. If you listen to their music in the background ~ that music has more emotion than their singing.
<S> Easy8
<S> Mac

Offline sluggish

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2474
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2008, 10:01:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by texasmom
Yeah, maybe they intended to sound like they didn't mean it.

Not gusto meaning "loud..."
How come I can't say that right?

Yes, bridge over troubled water & sounds of silence ~ both I can imagine sung with gusto... not "loud..." just with passion I guess is what I'm trying to say.

They sound like they don't mean it.


"The Sound of Silence would be horrible sung with "gusto".  It is a dark melancholy song sung from a shadow.

"Bridge Over Troubled Water" is a very dynamic song.  It starts out quiet but by the end Art Garfunkel is wailing.  It can still bring a tear to my eye.

Offline texasmom

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6078
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2008, 10:02:49 PM »
I'm gonna stop listening to the youtube live shots & go get the CD out. Maybe they just have emotionless stage performance.

*edit* meloncholy shouldn't translate to emotionless. It can be even more powerful than others. Just not with these two.
« Last Edit: February 26, 2008, 10:05:27 PM by texasmom »
<S> Easy8
<S> Mac

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #12 on: February 26, 2008, 10:10:14 PM »
Mom, that's just 60/70's "artsy" folk singers. Check out any of their peers, they were just the same.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline texasmom

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6078
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2008, 10:25:18 PM »
like who else?
<S> Easy8
<S> Mac

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
simon & garfunkel
« Reply #14 on: February 26, 2008, 10:45:24 PM »
Simon and Garfunkel rule. 'Nuff said.
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.