Author Topic: Falkland Is.'s under dispute again  (Read 1679 times)

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Falkland Is.'s under dispute again
« Reply #60 on: April 05, 2008, 11:13:27 AM »
yeah we get the new carriers and the F35s about 2012/14 i think :rock

in the meantime we still have 3 invincible class carriers equipped with Harrier GR7, unlike the Sea Harrier essentially a strike plane with no radar. your right, this is a worrying gap in capability. the choice was to build a new set of Sea Harriers or refit the GR7 with radar, both for just 5 years of service, both a big waste of money. the result is that fleet air defense is covered by ship-based missiles and GR7s with AIM9s and pilots with good eyesight. good thing we've got decent AEW choppers...
« Last Edit: April 05, 2008, 11:15:37 AM by RTHolmes »
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: Falkland Is.'s under dispute again
« Reply #61 on: April 05, 2008, 11:24:07 AM »
yeah we get the new carriers and the F35s about 2012/14 i think :rock

in the meantime we still have 3 invincible class carriers equipped with Harrier GR7, unlike the Sea Harrier essentially a strike plane with no radar. your right, this is a worrying gap in capability. the choice was to build a new set of Sea Harriers or refit the GR7 with radar, both for just 5 years of service, both a big waste of money. the result is that fleet air defense is covered by ship-based missiles and GR7s with AIM9s. good thing we've got decent AEW choppers...

See, that's the crux of the whole problem, right there. For one, Argentina's military is different today, too. They scrapped their CV. They just have land-based planes. However, they've added some FFG's and Corvettes' that carry Exocets', and since the Malvinas'(OOPS, Falklands!) are only 300 miles' offshore, land-based aircraft can hit it anyway. I take it, that the RAF extended the runways' at the Airport there to handle the Typhoons, correct? The one problem that the Argie's had last time, was that they couldn't operate their A-4's or Super-Entendards' from Port Stanley's airfield. It was only big enough to handle Pucara's. From what I've read, the Argentine's haven't really done much to their Air Force since '82, apart from an upgrade to the A-4 fleet.

Offline Lumpy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 547
Re: Falkland Is.'s under dispute again
« Reply #62 on: April 05, 2008, 11:28:24 AM »
Well, you guys won the Falklands war with army Harriers on your carriers. Bet you could do it again.
“I’m an angel. I kill first borns while their mommas watch. I turn cities into salt. I even – when I feel like it – rip the souls from little girls and now until kingdom come the only thing you can count on, in your existence, is never ever understanding why.”

-Archangel Gabriel, The P

Offline xbrit

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1669
Re: Falkland Is.'s under dispute again
« Reply #63 on: April 05, 2008, 11:36:17 AM »
Well, you guys won the Falklands war with army Harriers on your carriers. Bet you could do it again.
hmm they were RAF and RN Harriers, no Harriers in Army inventory.

Offline Lumpy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 547
Re: Falkland Is.'s under dispute again
« Reply #64 on: April 05, 2008, 11:37:13 AM »
Arospatiale SA 315 Lama    2    
Beechcraft T-34 Mentor    31    
Bell UH-1H Iroquois        8    
Bell 212 Twin Huey    6 [4]    
Boeing 707    1    3 in storage non operational
Boeing 757        1    
Cessna 182 Skylane       18    
Dassault Mirage III    12    12 in storage
Dassault Mirage V    7    In storage
de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter       8    
Embraer Tucano       22    
FMA IA 58 Pucar       24    
FMA IA 63 Pampa       20    
Saab-340        4
Fokker F27 Friendship    8
Fokker F28 Fellowship    6
Hughes H-6 Cayuse    5    
IAI Finger    13    In storage, non operative
Learjet 35        4    
Learjet 60          1    
Lockheed C-130 Hercules    8
McDonnell Douglas A-4 Skyhawk    34    
MD/RACA MD 500 Defender    11
Piper PA-31 Navajo    2    
Rockwell Aero Commander 500        4    
Rockwell Sabreliner        1    
Sikorsky S-70 Black Hawk        1    
Sikorsky S-76 Spirit        1    
Sukhoi Su-29       7    In storage
“I’m an angel. I kill first borns while their mommas watch. I turn cities into salt. I even – when I feel like it – rip the souls from little girls and now until kingdom come the only thing you can count on, in your existence, is never ever understanding why.”

-Archangel Gabriel, The P

Offline Lumpy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 547
Re: Falkland Is.'s under dispute again
« Reply #65 on: April 05, 2008, 11:38:04 AM »
hmm they were RAF and RN Harriers, no Harriers in Army inventory.

Meant RAF, sorry.
“I’m an angel. I kill first borns while their mommas watch. I turn cities into salt. I even – when I feel like it – rip the souls from little girls and now until kingdom come the only thing you can count on, in your existence, is never ever understanding why.”

-Archangel Gabriel, The P

Offline xbrit

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1669
Re: Falkland Is.'s under dispute again
« Reply #66 on: April 05, 2008, 11:45:44 AM »
Meant RAF, sorry.
No problem.
At least the facilities at Ascension Island were upgraded so resupply would be a lot easier than the last time. Though they showed an armada leaving UK quite a few ships were deployed from Gibraltar, were they were on exercise at the time. I remember working 18 hour shifts for the first few weeks getting supplies into Gib and then down to the dockyard and then later with aircraft staging through on the way to Ascension.