GTO,
Bob showed a lack of judgement in your scenario and should be judged accordingly, in a court of law. He is the kind of irresponsible gun owner that reflects badly on the rest of us. Chuck sounds like he could use a bit more training as well, particularly at the pistol range. Someone may also want to clue him in on the gun laws in his area, in many cases a guy walking into a 7-11 wearing a gun is as legal as wearing a pair of sunglasses. And the uptight liberal with 911 speed dial ... she needs to get laid.
Mav,
A lack of maturity ... should not be carrying at all ... I see.
Therefore, because you wish to excercise your right to pick your own religion I should deduce you lack maturity and should not be going to church at all?
Or if you chose to excercise your right to peaceably assemble I should consider you immature and you should not be able to peaceably assemble?
Its not about being a tough guy, or showing how big I am, its simply about excercising a right, doing something as legal as going to church or attending a political rally. Too long have the anti-gun folks pounded the idea that 'gunz r bad' into peoples head, the simplest and most effective way of showing the populace that guns are not bad is by responsible gun owners wearing their guns (where legally able to do so). I know of many folks who open carry on a daily basis with no negative consequences. Of course there are the instances when uninformed LEOs come goose-stepping in and try to intimidate, but those are the exception rather than the norm. And the outcomes of those instances generally turn out well for the gun owners. Google Dickson City.
Is it making a statement? To some degrees, yes. It states that I am responsible for my own protection, it states I refuse to become a helpless, defenseless victim, it states that I will, if necessarry defend myself to the best of my ability. So in those cases, yeah, I suppose it is making a strong statement. But the more subtle statement, and possibly more important in the long term, is that guns in and of themselves are not bad, its the people weilding them who make bad decisions.
I have thought long and hard about OC'ing and on a daily basis, its something I probably will not do. In many ways I think it takes away a tactical advantage and gives the bad guys a priority target. Better in many cases to conceal carry. I'm looking into getting additionial training, specifically in gun retention, before I decide wether to open carry regularly or not. The consequenses of my potential choices are not lost on me, I'm not the type of person to go do a thing without being very well informed about that thing, whatever it may be.
As far as explaining to a LEO just what I am doing ... so long as I am not commiting a crime, I am under no compulsion to explain anything, but since I'm excercising my right to remain silent, I assume that shows immaturity and I should start talking.
Informed differences of opinion and the discussion they bring are the reason why I post. If I wanted to hear someone agree with me all the time I'd just email myself.
Wrag,
Open carry is legal in my state, with the exceptions of two cities. In fact in all but MD every state in my area is legal to OC.