Author Topic: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??  (Read 2211 times)

Offline Valerio

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« on: May 24, 2008, 02:52:09 PM »
Alright i don't know if any of you have ever seen a real battle ship like the USS Arizona. They carried 2 helicopters on the back for medic, or pick up wounded soldiers (Pilots and everyone else on Allied side). Airfields didn't usually have Helicopters except for Large Airfields. So i think adding helicopters would be a good idea for a pilot who ejected from plane and has landed in the water or land; you should be able to fly it from a CV escort battle ship or Large Airfield. Also if this idea does get put into the game when the Helicopter gets within 10 feet of a player on ground or sea he should have a button show on his screen to enter the helicopter if he wants to; the helicopter should have a maximum of 5 player pickups and a gunner too. If any case that would save pilots from being captured and having there rank decrease. Obviously planes can shoot at the helicopters and the helicopters will have 2x50 calibers (Browning machine gun) on each side to shoot at enemy troops and close range planes. The amount of ammo that should be mounted on the 50 cals should be 250 rounds each. Also, you cant say that this is stupid like having subs or making more GV's because it comes into the fact that AH is an air rial combat game and helicopters are in that category. The helicopter also cant cost perks and only gets 0.50 perk points (attack points) for every guy sense its a dangerous thing to do and also he is saving someone so it should at least give him half a perk point; that would also make sure there is the right amount of players wanting to use the Helicopter. You have to admit if you made it give you like 5 perk points for every guy then everyone would want to use it and the idea would be a total tragedy. I am one who wants the helicopter in AH if you are too post a note saying I WANT HELICOPTERS IN AH! :rock

Your friend,
Valerio  :salute 






i WRITE STUPIDITY, NOT COMEDY. STUPIDITY = COMEDY.

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2008, 03:01:05 PM »
You do realize this is a game based on World War Two, yes?
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline Valerio

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2008, 03:02:39 PM »
YES AND THE USS ARIZONA WAS IN WWII DO YOU READ YOUR HISTORY ABOUT WWII?
People the USS Arizona sank in WWII along with its two medical rescue helicopters.
i WRITE STUPIDITY, NOT COMEDY. STUPIDITY = COMEDY.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2008, 03:03:58 PM »
YES AND THE USS ARIZONA WAS IN WWII DO YOU READ YOUR HISTORY ABOUT WWII?
People the USS Arizona sank in WWII along with its two medical rescue helicopters.
nevermind
See Rule #4

Offline Valerio

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2008, 03:05:52 PM »
The fact that Helicopters were first made in WWII does not mean they weren't used. If you go to WWII helicopters in google search you will find right in front of your face. Plus helicopters were made in 1938 (Prototypes) - 2008 were they are still being used. 
i WRITE STUPIDITY, NOT COMEDY. STUPIDITY = COMEDY.

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2008, 03:06:37 PM »
I still haven't decided whether this guy is a troll, a four year old, or a genuine deficient.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline Valerio

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2008, 03:08:38 PM »
Go to this site http://www.olive-drab.com/od_medical_evac_helio_ww2.php and see me be right.
i WRITE STUPIDITY, NOT COMEDY. STUPIDITY = COMEDY.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2008, 03:08:58 PM »
I still haven't decided whether this guy is a troll, a four year old, or a genuine deficient.
He does have a good taste in avitards though.
See Rule #4

Offline Valerio

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #8 on: May 24, 2008, 03:11:37 PM »
Go to this site http://www.olive-drab.com/od_medical_evac_helio_ww2.php and see me be right.

They used the Helicopters in 1944 for pickups and were not very much used during 1940's  but they were used, how can you fight when i have evidence about this? You would like to have Helicopters wouldn't you?
i WRITE STUPIDITY, NOT COMEDY. STUPIDITY = COMEDY.

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2008, 03:12:42 PM »
He does have a good taste in avitards though.
:lol :rofl :lol
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline Valerio

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2008, 03:13:25 PM »
While evacuation by helicopter is established practice since the Korean War, during World War II the use of helicopters was practically unknown. The helicopters concept had obvious military advantages and designs were developed and experimented with in the early 1940s with a few practical models produced during World War II. On April 20, 1942, Igor Sikorsky staged a successful flight demonstration of his helicopter. By March 1943 the Army had ordered thirty-four Sikorsky helicopters. These aircraft could be quickly converted to air ambulance use by attaching litters to the sides of the aircraft.
First Helicopter Medical Evacuation in 1944

The China-Burma-India "Hump" airlift operation was the theater for what was probably the first use of a helicopter in a combat rescue. In April 1944, TSgt Ed "Murphy" Hladovcak of the 1st Air Commandos, piloting a Stinson L-1 Vigilant with three wounded British soldiers on board, was forced down over 100 miles (160 km) behind Japanese lines, 15 miles (25 km) west of Mawlu, Burma. Deep in the jungle where an airplane could not land, unable to hike out because of the injured passengers, and with ground-rescue forces days away, the downed men hid from nearby Japanese soldiers. A newly-delivered Army Sikorsky YR-4B helicopter, piloted by Lt. Carter Harmon, with a 175-horsepower engine, was dispatched to try a rescue. In the heat and humidity of Burma, the YR-4B could carry only one passenger at a time, straining its engine past the redline just to lift off. Despite these difficulties, over the two day period 25-26 April 1944, four trips were made in and out to a secure location where the men could safely transfer to a Stinson L-5 Sentinel. The final hasty liftoff was accomplished just as shouting soldiers burst from the jungle. As Lt. Harmon learned later, the soldiers were not Japanese, but an Allied land rescue party that had finally reached the crash site. The great success of the mission encouraged the advocates of helicopters, but few other missions actually took place during WW II.

In China during the final months of the war, Sikorsky R-6As provided search and rescue services. Right after the end of the war, in November 1945, an Army Sikorsky R-5 helicopter was used to rescue two men from a stranded oil barge in a storm. In spite of their limitations, military leaders realized the potential of helicopters for evacuation, search and rescue, although bigger helicopters with greater internal capacity and more powerful engines were needed.
Medical Evacuation Helicopters of WW II

    * Sikorsky R-4 Helicopter
    * Sikorsky R-5 Helicopter
    * Sikorsky R-6 Helicopter

Find More Information on the Web

There are many fine websites that have additional information on this topic, too many to list here and too many to keep up with as they come and go. Use this Google web search form to get an up to date report of what's out there.
i WRITE STUPIDITY, NOT COMEDY. STUPIDITY = COMEDY.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2008, 03:14:31 PM »
They really have no use in game though, whether or not they had a role in WWII.

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2008, 03:16:01 PM »
They used the Helicopters in 1944 for pickups and were not very much used during 1940's  but they were used, how can you fight when i have evidence about this? You would like to have Helicopters wouldn't you?
That only leaves the rest of your initial post . . .  :rolleyes:
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline Valerio

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 118
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2008, 03:16:33 PM »
They really have no use in game though, whether or not they had a role in WWII.
Why don't they? Give me a point why couldn't this be a good idea?
i WRITE STUPIDITY, NOT COMEDY. STUPIDITY = COMEDY.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Helicopters... GOOD IDEA OR BAD??
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2008, 03:18:25 PM »
Why don't they? Give me a point why couldn't this be a good idea?
There is no rescue in game. That was there primary role I believe.
See Rule #4