Author Topic: South Osetia under attack  (Read 116458 times)

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #570 on: August 13, 2008, 10:09:05 AM »
Georgian Villages in South Ossetia Burnt, Looted

http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008/08/13/georgi19607.htm

I dont support that but neither does anyone on this bbs. Not even Boroda. Criminals the lot of them

Thank cod Georgia is not part of NATO. Hopefully they will never be members.

Offline Maniac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3817
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #571 on: August 13, 2008, 10:16:50 AM »
Bush just made a new speach. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7559263.stm

Quote
U.S. President Bush pledges support for Georgia, saying reports indicate that Russia is violating cease-fire agreement.

Quote
OUTSIDE TBILISI, Georgia (CNN) -- Evidence of the fighting is everywhere in the Georgian city of Gori -- blood on the ground, the smell of smoke in the air, and wrecked cars in the street, according to a CNN crew that drove through the area.

This is a video you should watch imo http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2008/08/13/cnni.intv.georgia.pres.saakasvhili.cnn
« Last Edit: August 13, 2008, 10:51:07 AM by Maniac »
Warbirds handle : nr-1 //// -nr-1- //// Maniac

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #572 on: August 13, 2008, 10:47:35 AM »
Bush pledges military aircraft and naval forces for humanitarian aid. Interesting.
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #573 on: August 13, 2008, 10:49:32 AM »
Like I said in a previous post, doesnt Georgia have the most # of Foriegn troops besides the Brits? I was told they do, so I dont think Bush would just ditch them, nor would he to Israel.
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Maniac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3817
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #574 on: August 13, 2008, 10:56:07 AM »
Like I said in a previous post, doesnt Georgia have the most # of Foriegn troops besides the Brits? I was told they do, so I dont think Bush would just ditch them, nor would he to Israel.

They had 2000 trops in Iraq wich the US has helped get back to Georgia since the conlfict began.
Warbirds handle : nr-1 //// -nr-1- //// Maniac

Offline angelsandair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3126
      • RT Website
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #575 on: August 13, 2008, 10:59:53 AM »
Ah, but still, I doubt that Bush will just let them get taken over by the Russians. Especailly if they sent as many troops into Iraq as they did for such a small country.
Quote
Goto Google and type in "French military victories", then hit "I'm feeling lucky".
Here lie these men on this sun scoured atoll,
The wind for their watcher, the wave for their shroud,
Where palm and pandanus shall whisper forever,
A requiem fitting for heroes

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #576 on: August 13, 2008, 12:02:22 PM »
http://english.pravda.ru/topic/georgia_ossetia-603/

fun to read good old Pravda  :rofl

Pravda dot ru doesn't have anything to do with Pravda.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13366
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #577 on: August 13, 2008, 12:12:35 PM »
Bush pledges military aircraft and naval forces for humanitarian aid. Interesting.

Indeed it is and Rice is on her way if not already there. Let's just hope Russia is done as they have said.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #578 on: August 13, 2008, 12:19:43 PM »
Pravda dot ru doesn't have anything to do with Pravda.

Boroda... what in hell has happened in Russia? Is Putin attempting to light eastern europe with the flames of burning villages? Whats going on with your citizens? They back this play?

Holy crap... you guys got either a rouge leader in moscow or a rouge general down there. Hope like hell they knock it off soon; cause this action will force a military confrontation in europe that'll make WWII look like it was a warm-up show. The mood here is one of shock and disgust... this ain't a border skimish now; it's war.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13366
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #579 on: August 13, 2008, 12:21:11 PM »
I have it on good authority, Amy Carter, that nuclear war is bad.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #580 on: August 13, 2008, 12:37:22 PM »
Quote
Not even Boroda.

Are you sure? Boroda keeps calling them vermin.  :uhoh
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #581 on: August 13, 2008, 12:39:30 PM »
Quote
Whats going on with your citizens? They back this play?

Hang, go read that blog that was posted in the other thread. If the people posting there are representive of the Russian populace as a whole, then I would say yes, they do *back this play.*
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #582 on: August 13, 2008, 12:51:23 PM »
All of the reports' coming out of Georgia look conflicting, but that's because they are compared side-by-side with conflicting claims' from the other side. I just saw this on the Yahoo front pages':http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080813/ap_on_re_eu/georgia_russia_103;_ylt=AsE827ymc7DdwMNM8_wnKO9bbBAF

Now, if this report is correct, then the Russians' are not honoring the ceasefire, which calls' for them not only to leave Georgia, but South Ossetia, and Abkhazia as well. So far, they have not complied.

It looks' like the Russians' are stalling with diplomacy, to try to keep the west out of it while they steal some land.

They are only making things' worse for themselves.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2008, 01:00:00 PM by FrodeMk3 »

Offline Dnil

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 879
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #583 on: August 13, 2008, 12:59:09 PM »
reports of irregulars coming in behind russian troops and looting.  Not only looting but forcing Georgians out, looting and burning the homes. 

Sounds familiar.

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: South Osetia under attack
« Reply #584 on: August 13, 2008, 01:01:49 PM »
I know Fox News isn't so far removed from American propaganda, but, I did watch a video report from one of their reporters driving in a vehicle out of Gori, passing at least a dozen or so BMP-21's with their associated dismounts, heading into the city.  I'm not quite as current on my Russian TO as I used to be, but it looked like a mechanized company strength unit, and they were oscar mike into the city.

The Russian "demilitarization" of the areas south of S.O. is the worrisome part.  That's a pretty open-ended mission by any definition.  I'm not partial to stirring up a hornets nest, but I think we need to draw a hard line here.  Too much at stake to allow the Russians to run wherever they want without due regard to their former territories sovereignty.  Shame we allowed them the freedom of action back in the 90's to set up these puppet territories in those two provinces to begin with.  But, we set some fairly duplicative precedent with Kosovo, so this is probably their version of "tit-for-tat".
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech